She is nowhere near fat.

She has a lovely figure.

Calm down Ben I just said it's my opinion.

I'm not saying girls can't be very slim and not be attractive, I just think girls in proportion with boobs and a bum and curves look better than someone with bones sticking out and who if they turn sideways you could blink and miss them, that's all.

no she's not! if anything this is a stupid thread yet my thread's get slagged down! :conf::bored:

She's not fat at all, She's got a great figure.

She's curvy. I'd prefere her body to one of the skinny girls such as Caoimhe!

Are you kiddin me! obese? Shes far from bloody obese. Shes not overweight at all, shes just not tonned or crazy skinny

No shes not fat at all.

Yeah but the girls who are natually very skinny anyway.

How would that make them feel? Thats not how they are meant to look?
So they start putting on weight and becoming unhealthy etc.

Rachel has a bit of a belly.. everyone can see that.

Rachael has a belly that is shaped like a belly - practically all females who do not do a good number of crunches and sit ups and what have you have this shape belly.

She is a very normal, slim woman. She looks about a size 10 (UK) to me - That's slim, in anyone's book.

id say she is fat. like a blob

theres no way shes a size ten, unless she shops at ASDA then shes probably a size 0

What size do think she is then?

I can't tell from your comment if you think she's a smaller or larger size.

She is curvylicious/bootylicious!!!!!

She is probably a bit overweight but who cares..

Yeah, there is a difference though between a naturally skinny girl and one who keeps herself underweight because she believes that is the way she is supposed to look.

You can tell looking at some women that they are just too thin for their frame and you can tell when a woman is just naturally slim built..

Unfortunately we seem to see more of the former these days

I'm a guy. No way would I call Rachel fat - that is just crazy.

Like most blokes I know, I LIKE curves !

I'd rather a girl was a little overweight than underweight. Much lager girls can be very attractive too. A big bum can be sexy, large thighs can be sexy.

All this size zero obsession is plain wrong. Ignore the media. Men like all shapes and sizes.

Rachel is a naturally curvy girl. Her body frame is not going to ever allow her to be a skinny size zero, it just won't happen.
She may be carrying a little extra weight than her perfect BMI but does that matter? Doesn't make her fat.

Im underweight, but i wouldn't call it a major issue anymore. I'm secure in my body now and i think as long as Rachel is that is all that matters.

she isnt fat.no wonder people have eating disordars.

Obese? you clearly should've went to specsavers.

ITS PEOPLE THAT CRITICISE THE WAY 'NORMAL' GIRLS LOOK; THAT MAKES 90% OF GIRLS OBSESSED WITH THEIR WEIGHT AND MAKE THEMSELFS ILL.

tuts.

You can tell the difference between girls who are naturally skinny, and girls who make their selves like that

Basically, the ones who are naturally like that, suit it, and don't look ill, others who have gone over the top with diets and that tend to look very very fragile...faces drawn in and that.


I find it ridiculous that people on here are saying rachel is fat to be honest. She is clearly far from it, there is a big difference between having a bit of a belly, and hips and boobs... and being fat.

You're not reading what I'm saying again Ben, it's my opinion!

And I'm sorry but anyone who has bones sticking out all over the place is not healthy. You're still stuck in that 'if a girl is carrying a bit of extra weight she must be harming her health' mentality.

she has the same build as venus williams . big and manly

Not at all. I find it ridiculous that people even consider for a second that she is, what is it with the world critcizing women for having a female shape these days? Rachael has an amazing figure. Saying this, I also find it stupid that people criticize girls who are naturally svelte, they are equally as beautiful. It's only figures like Victoria Beckham's that I find unnerving.

i'd say she was a 14 on top and 14 down below, at best a 12, but again depends on what shops you go in

There is not a thing wrong with rachael, might get some lip for this but josie is bigger than rachael, and i dont think there is anything wrong with either.

No, she is not fat. End of. Far from it. Really, end of.

Oh jesus. No, she's -not- fat and her legs look fat because of her LEG MUSCLES, or maybe it's the way her clothes cling to 'em.

If she was thinner than she already is, people'd be having panic attacks about how thin she was.

Besides, the average dress size for a woman in the U.K is I think, about a size 16, not skinny "super" model size 2.

totally agree
 

what a dumbass thread OMG I can't believe you posted that question you cretin.

Shes not fat, shes got it goin on

Agrees, Dita von Tease is an amazingly attractive woman, also loved Sophie Dahl (before she lost her weight) and Helena Bonham Carter is just magnificent.

i think rachaels fat, but then im a skinny bean pole

Why are you lot so obsessed with whether a girl is fat or not, haven't noticed anyone commenting on Dave's physic!! I don't like Rachel but then I am going by her personality, she hasn't got a very good one. But as to whether she is fat or not. NO, she has got a perfectly fine figure and a pretty face! Like I said shame she doesn't have the personality to match.

She aint fat!!! Are you crazy

Big boned is what i would call her.

Her Nuts stuff looked great but it was touched up no doubt.

Rachel's fit - far from 'fat'

Definitely not fat, can't believe there was actually a thread about this.

you lot are *****ing wierd if you think she's fat... For ***** sakes. You lot are the reason as to why some people starve themselves. She is perfect, Why would anyone want to be skinny its rank.

She aint fat (am a lad)
she got curves and she's stunning for them picture her relly skinny not as nice