ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Child benefit cuts (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=163690)

Beastie 14-10-2010 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 3833827)
"without children our future is ****ed "


You need to watch the DVD or BluRay
Surrogates starring Bruce Willis.

Life In The Fast Lane.

There are too many people in the world as it is.

There is no need for families to have lots of children IF they can't afford them.

If they want big families but CANNOT afford them.. why don't they have a job in a school? Be a nursery nurse or teacher or child minder.. then you are with lots of children everyday and doing something useful and not scrounging off the government to bring up your own sprogs :thumbs:

Amen!

Tom 14-10-2010 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rhino (Post 3839714)
On 'This Morning' right now some pathetic couple with 7 children, living on benefits. She say's its her 'right' as a woman to have children (but not her right to pay for them apparently) He says he can't get a job that he would 'like' doing so he wont bother coming off benefits but he might think about it if he found a job he would enjoy. She says she'll have 20 children if she wants its her right. What *******ing planet - have them castrated - These 'adults' are children and Labour is their parent!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

A cap needs putting on it in cases like that when women are only popping more out for the benefits and for peopel like him, well they shouldn't even be on benefits. I reckon they should recieve shopping vouchers instead that can only be spent on certain thinsg so that if they want some kind of social life then they'll have to go out and god forbid ... get a job.

NettoSuperstar! 15-10-2010 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by angus58 (Post 3845482)
You are a totally deluded labour apologist who will not accept that 13 years of mismanagement and incompetence has led us once again to a precipice from which the incoming government are left to try and pull us back. No doubt you also support strike action too that always affects the ordinary HARDWORKING folk in this country. Personally, I hope the government fight the selfish and greedy unions, since no one sector of the workforce in this country should be able to hold the rest of us to ransom. I have no time for avaricious union bosses encouraging (one would even say forcing) members to strike to cause the maximum disruption and upset for the rest of us, out of some selfish determination to preserve jobs and privileges for their own, with no thought as to who will pick up the tab. I have always loathed and detested trade unions and I can still remember the Callaghan government when the unions practically ruined this country. Let's hope this government take them on and defeat them.

And don't try and twist my words - both my sons are HARDWORKING and in FULL TIME EMPLOYMENT, one of whom supports a family of 4, and both are on a lot less than £30k. Neither of them were brought up to think the world OWES them a living. They contribute to society and pay their taxes so what the hell are you on about?

Furthermore, Labour HAS encouraged the workshy, feckless, scrounging layabouts we see all about us with their hordes of kids that other people pay for, so don't deny it. Cut their benefits and force them to take any job and CONTRIBUTE instead of sitting on their fat arses and expecting others to keep them. You seem to think the world owes everybody a living! Well it doesn't. These are hard times and people should be glad they've even got a job these days. It's about time that welfare benefits were reined in for all but the truly needy, not seen as a lifestyle choice for lazy gits.

It's pointless trying to debate with a dyed in the wool socialist who puts the blame everywhere but where it deserves to be, and what's more discriminates in favour of those working in the public sector as if they are somehow MORE important than the rest of us.

Oh, and what about all the above issues you mention that need addressing? Ask yourself why Labour, who had THIRTEEN long years in power, DID NOTHING, and in fact left us in a worse state, yet here you are still defending them and their appalling record. This present government's immediate concerns is to cut spending and most normal, sensible, reasonable people with even a basic grasp of economics and housekeeping know that it has to be done.

I can't be arsed to respond to any more of your posts - I've made my position clear, and we will never agree in a million years.


Again, this is not about defending Labour, I am pointing out that they have pretty much continued where the Tories left off aside from a few things like the minimum wage, working time directive, modernising schools and hospitals...so any argument that their spending got us in this mess is a lie.

I am also not a socialist and I'll ignore most of the rant as I havent even mentioned most of it, except to say Im not a socialist, I believe in fairness, equal opportunities, workers rights (for ALL workers and within reason) I dont believe in striking without very good reason and with support of the majority of workers involved. I believe we should have decent public services to enable us to continue to be productive and contribute to society. If you disagree with that then yes we will never see eye to eye, oh well

Yeh benefit cheats are piss takers and we need to deal with them, theyre generally the uneducated and we should be intervening where kids arent going to school, perhaps withholding child benefit as part of that intervention. If children dont even get an education what hope have they got? We shouldnt be dealing with it by penalising ordinary hard working people. But the biggest piss takers are in those in the financial sector that got us in this mess who are taking billions of pounds a year in bonuses and stashing their money in offshore accounts, I know who I'm more angry with!

The scale of the cuts (EDIT: The ConDemns are planning (ok Arista)) is alarming and should be handled better and with real fairness END OF

arista 15-10-2010 10:49 AM

"The scale of the cuts is alarming"

Hang on a Minute
we do not know yet.

20 oct. is the day we find out.

arista 15-10-2010 11:40 AM

"(EDIT: The tories are planning (ok Arista)) "#

No its Conservative - LibDem Power.

NettoSuperstar! 15-10-2010 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 3847064)
"(EDIT: The tories are planning (ok Arista)) "#

No its Conservative - LibDem Power.

Ya like the Lib Dems get any say lol...they get thrown a few titbits from the Tory table haha

arista 15-10-2010 11:47 AM

"like the Lib Dems get any say "

Yes they do.
Nick Clegg is doing that today.

It is a 2 party power - End Of.

NettoSuperstar! 15-10-2010 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 3847067)
"like the Lib Dems get any say "

Yes they do.
Nick Clegg is doing that today.

It is a 2 party power - End Of.

Keep on keeping on Arista...We're ConDemned lol

Livia 21-10-2010 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucy. (Post 3829638)
Well maybe if you ever know someone who earns over 44k and isn't in the picture perfect idea everyone seems to have that their loaded you'll think differently.

If they earn over 44k pa I don't particularly want my tax going to pay for them to have an extra few quid in their pocket because they chose to have kids. I already pay into an education system for their children.

Child benefit was brought in after the war to help ease poverty and to boost birth rates. We don't need that incentive anymore. Child benefit should only go to those on a low wage.

Angus 22-10-2010 06:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 3859699)
If they earn over 44k pa I don't particularly want my tax going to pay for them to have an extra few quid in their pocket because they chose to have kids. I already pay into an education system for their children.

Child benefit was brought in after the war to help ease poverty and to boost birth rates. We don't need that incentive anymore. Child benefit should only go to those on a low wage.

Exactly - in a nutshell.

joeysteele 22-10-2010 07:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 3859699)
If they earn over 44k pa I don't particularly want my tax going to pay for them to have an extra few quid in their pocket because they chose to have kids. I already pay into an education system for their children.

Child benefit was brought in after the war to help ease poverty and to boost birth rates. We don't need that incentive anymore. Child benefit should only go to those on a low wage.

I am not working yet as I am at Uni but I have to say I agree 100% with this comment, it says everything really.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.