He's a not-so-passive passive aggressive wind up merchant prick. In that sense, there's enough malice to fill a room.
You can be disliked because your personality is X or Y and that's valid enough - but LG is just putting up a show and goes in for the kill. Why? Because.

But he didn't target people like Lewis G is doing. The constant singing their name, the shouting, waking them up, invading their personal space. It just feels nasty to me. It feels personal,?

he did though! :laugh:

I think he's very nasty and enjoys upsetting people. Not a nice person at all.

At all

For me Lewis G is the nasty one. With Bear you just knew he meant no harm. At least that's the way i see it.

Yes he did, Bear was nasty, LG is trying to copy but he isnt malicious imo, both are boring

Other way round for me.

Bear was a cretin...Lewis G is a poor imitation. There is something weird about loving Bear and hating Lewis....exactly same behaviour set, same loud brash behaviour. Both pretty poor excuses of humans. I really don't think this is Lewis' actual persona though, I think he's pretty insecure and acting up. Bear is just a nob and nothing will change him

I agree Lewis G is just copying Bear. It's all an act.

:clap1:

As much as I dislike Lewis G, he's absolutely acting all his personality. He backtracks a lot when called out on his behaviour and does still try being a people pleaser in spite of all the pissing off he does and I don't think he's actually EVIL like Bear. G's just a pervy self-conscious immature child. If he wasn't such an over-saturated presence, he could've presented himself as an insecure, complex, compelling housemate. Instead he decides to imitate the nastiest housemate ever. Getting evicted now is for his own good long-term so he can reflect on these hasty choices he's made.

Indeed.

Same behaviour, however Bear was a lot worse than lewis, nastier and more extreme, and relentless too. Between pissing off people, Lewis is actually ok, but Bear was just 24/7 dickhead. I did support Bear mind, but I don't pretend hes a nice person.
Agree with this too.

I disagree..Bear was far worse.

Both nasty pieces of work, nothing between them, Bear and Lewis G.

Why they have apologists for their behaviour is beyond me because if they started on them, these apologists like Kay and Isaac soon start whinging it isn't right.

They soon change their tunes.

Either way Lewis G is a bellend with a very poor game plan - it's on the level of his brain - dead :laugh:
So bye bye and good luck in life - which will be short if you think you can go round treating other people like stuff you trod in !!

Chip off the old block you are.

Emma loving him :joker: shame he was gutted, and wasn’t afraid to show it...

Emma getting it totally :flutter:

:clap1:

Didn’t mind him too much overall, he was a Dickhead at times but had a good heart underneath it all and wasn’t a bad person.

Hate him all you want but he was entertaining and the house will be quiet without him

Came across fairly well, and magnanimous, in the interview.

I was Pleasantly surprised by him during his interview. I thought he would be similar to Bear and Talk over Emma, Not Respond to her questions and just be a Prick.

Looks like he was putting on an act this whole time

Well he is a prick...but he is not as bigger a prick as Bear. He was gutted and had to accept defeat...
He isn't a bad guy...just a twat. He needs to grow up and not drink alcohol.

...it’s a shame that we had a housemate who could have offered so much interest in terms of his childhood in the PlayBoy mansion...and the aspects of his own character...but instead all he offered was Stephen Bear, a Stephen Bear copy...the moral of the story is always be yourself ...it might be a game show but part of that game show is revealing your own character as well...

I actually said that very thing a while back ... I even predicted that he'd come across very well in the interview ...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

The thing I disliked most about Lewis was his father...

You could see he was DYING inside.
"How did I get it so wrong?"
"How did it all backfire me?"
"What went wrong? It should've worked."
You could see all these thoughts through his eyes, but he had to put on a brave face and smile.
Fake fake fake.

It all backfired on him , i think his parents especially his dad has something to do with his behaviour.

He still should of tried toning it down , it got tiresome seeing him do the same thing over and over again. He couldn't comprehend that not everyone see's his antics as a funny joke.

Even if he enjoys winding people up to stop boredom, didn't he realise they'd nominate him and he could get evicted? :facepalm: .

If he hadn't acted like a complete buffoon, he could have gone much further.

He didn't know how to be entertaining without it being humiliating and making others feel uncomfortable.

Why he kept banging on that he would have stopped if Lewis F had explained how it felt, was absolute toss, he would have upped his tormenting him rather than stopped.

LEwis G has a peculiar understanding of how he should behave, his parents should hang their heads in shame to have let him grow up with these slanted values. He does not respect anyone or anything, he doesn't even understand how his values are skewed and just because you can do things doesn't mean that you should.

I'm so happy he's gone you have no idea! :cheer2:

Maybe he thought it was vote to save?

if ur gonna be a windup u have to do it to the whole house, if you just do it to one person it comes off like a bully. he didn't commit and it cost him

i believe him when he says he doesn't intend to hurt people but it's a bit worrying how much he lacks empathy. how can you get on in life lacking that much empathy?

he doesn't seem to understand that even if people don't say it, they could still be feeling bad from the things that he says.

i really wonder how he was brought up, i reckon he must have spent a lot of time on his own to lack so much empathy

He probably talked about that, but it wasn't shown.

or the reasons why many of the HM said deep down hes a lovely/nice guy when hes not being a wind up merchant. we only saw that a couple times when he was being chill & having a normal convo or a good laugh with others in a group.

Perhaps one day he can learn to realise there's more to life than trying to wind people up. Whatever the intentions behind that were, he was irritating and predictable.

And I refuse to believe his treatment of Anamelia was "without malice".

I'm just glad he's out. Now we will finally see more of the others. Isaac next please! :wavey:

...he has like a Britney syndrome mindset...oooops, I did it again...he feels that if he apologises then it’s ok and it’s without malice because of that apology...when there is no ‘without malice’ with purposeful repeated behaviour of targeting and winding up like he practises...the clue is from his own words really...’I always apologise’....he wouldn’t need to always apologise and continue apologising for the same persistent behaviour...if he actually thought to maybe think more about what he was doing and the impact it was having on people around him, that it was spoiling their time in creating bad vibes...but so long as he thinks it’s fine, he considers no one else or their feelings...no need to apologise if he considered anyone except himself...

In her interview she said he was a nice guy so she didnt feel it

She wasn't on the end of it, all the people who voted him out disagreed.