:joker:


I mean if she was on the front of Gardeners World I would be suspicious :laugh:

Not sure why what I posted requires such animosity.

Nor did I say anything on AJ's behalf, I commented that it's fairly obvious one is going to be more of an interest to UK Royalists.

I don't need your permission.

So confident in sales they had to use a bit of Prince Phillip's press under the guise of not wanting to use a bit of his press. Not a shocker.

Obviously not Kate's mum's fault but a disgusting move from the magazine.

she works in care she does not need to advertise her business as it does not make m0oney

Carol has to advertise to get sales for her business and getting promo in GH is brilliant

Id imagine she does not need the money but enjoys the work. SO if markles mum is in the oprah thing then one would have to question why?

Kates mom is lovely ,how good does she look,hope I age that well.

Thank you

Why are you asking this when nobody has seen it yet. Do you have a crystal ball?

plenty articles now online saying a good source let this info slip

lots of people have seen it at CBS

i posted one earlier

No. You just asked this thread why. Nobody here works for CBS.

Meghan Markle's mum Doria Ragland 'could make surprise appearance in Oprah interview'

The 39-year-old Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry moved to the US last year, and it is understood her mum is a big reason for them doing so.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-new...gland-23569164


:whistle:

Could?

Well it's been recorded now so either she did or she didn't.

Not sure what relevance it has anyway. Is she being criticised for appearing? Thus proving Amy's original post correct?

Come on guys this is ridiculous - not one of us would have had a clue who Kate's mum was if we'd passed her on the street before seeing her picture on this thread.

Of course we do she was all over the media for a year when kate and wills married

The Grandmother of the 7 year old future King on the non-Royal side?

Have some respect! She's huge!

Bollocks, only Royal fetishists care enough to take note of such tertiary Royals, this is just point-scoring fantasy. This nonsense about her respectfully pulling her fluff piece from good housekeeping (... :idc: ) is only news AT ALL because of Harry and Meghan. Which basically sums up the whole thing.

i wouldn't be able to pick out Kate on the street, so Kate's mum has no chance :laugh: The royals are a different matter, they all have the same genetic markers, so i could spot them from a mile away

I assumed she made an appearance ,the way it was worded but who knows.

...I did spoiler that pic, will you stop...on and on and on...can we just let it go, please...

:joker::joker:

Leeching off the royal connection I see. And look of course she is applauded for doing it. I wonder whyte?

Well I would and I am sure many will agree....why would a magazine put her on their front cover if nobody knew who she was :shrug:

Kate's mother looks alot like her, but in a different setting I don't think many people would know who she is .

I know what all the Middletons look like, even Pippa's hubby, who is married to Made In Chelsea Spencer Matthews brother. :laugh:

her mom looks gorgeous :love:

I know who she is but without her name next to her photo on there, I wouldn't have known that was her. She's not in the public eye daily so many non Royal watchers wouldn't know her. That's not a bad thing though :laugh:

I'm not sure why she would want the magazine pulled though, I highly doubt she has said anything disrespectful in the interview. :shrug:

...(...I’m guessing...)...that because it was always due for the April issue and Philip is in now hospital now, which wouldn’t have been known he would be...she’s asked for a delay...that’s what I’m thinking...not for any content of the article...

I don't know what this woman has done to get such venom ,she seems nice enough and very attractive , she also seems to be a woman of morals ,so why not have her on a magazine cover?

:whistle:

...why is it even a woman on the cover of Good Housekeeping...I’m just looking at past covers, all 75 million of them and I can only see two with a man on the cover...one is Hugh Jackman and the other is Jamie Oliver...why are t there an equal amount male/female covers...why is House keeping a woman thing...?...sod off Good Housekeeping, this is very awful House Keeping...

She is still a fine looking woman, very classy

Considering her Business...GH is an ideal for promoting it. Shes growing her business...its a family business and will continue to be so when she chooses to retire.
Good for them...a BA Pilot and Stewardess did very well for themselves.

Pretty much, but then again, there's more hate towards Meghan than a literal peado prince, so you can't expect rationality from this country. We are such a weak, gullible country.

But enough about Meghan Markle, this is about Kate's mom.

Rationality left a long time ago let's be honest

Comment about what you like but posting flat out lies is just silly

1st mention of Meghans mother on this post...so where is the lie?

I wonder how much she was paid

She paid them.

:joker: :joker: