![]() |
Quote:
Mother nature played a nasty trick on men, giving us cocks and those damn sex drives. And eyes. And didn’t even have the compassion to turn us into eunuchs when we reach 45 or so…..:laugh: |
I enjoyed reading your posts on this subject tonight Mock. Good stuff! :clap1:
|
Quote:
It's probably not good for the Forum having myself and QB debating on polar opposite viewpoints in this situation.:laugh: We're both stubborn bastards.:joker: |
Quote:
|
It's as ridiculous as having some twenty year old boys in Speedos walking the women dart players onto the stage. Gratuitous objectification.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I remember how popular the chippendales and the dream boys used to be.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Anyhoo I will be buying a blind fold for Mr C and will only remove it when play commences .....:fist: |
Quote:
Just let Mr C look at one of them... Tight dress, big bobs, pumped up lips... They all look pretty much the same. And if I want muscley men I'll watch the rugby tyvm.... Nice to see you've not changed your name while I was away... I'm playing a who's who catch up! |
Quote:
|
Brace yourself for an electrifying night of unadulterated pleasure and indulge in the “Dreamboys: Stripped Back” 2024 Worldwide Tour. Be part of our explosive, immersive, and seductive dance show as the Dreamboys take the stage
|
I see both sides of the debate really. Fundamentally I think it's a pretty harmless practice and while it might be a bit sad and a bit pervy the reality is that you'll never be able to completely de-sexualise society. Saying that I don't think it's needed and it doesn't really add anything. I've almost never heard people lamenting the absence of walk on girls since they were scrapped
|
Quote:
Personally I don't see anything sexy about a bunch of greased up muscle men dancing around in collar and cuffs and little else. And I guarantee they will not cause me to "lose my damn mind". I saw the Dreamboys at an airport once, wandering around in t.shirts with DREAMBOYS emblazoned on them in case anyone missed them. They looked... thick. Just my opinion of course. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I don't really watch darts, but the PDC, and the bookies who sponsor it all, and Sky who air it, are massive organisations with proper safeguarding in place. They are not promised the world, or a "way out" like Tate did to all his women. They're merely offered a job. They are not asked to perform sex acts on stage are they?!! Literally, it's completely up to the women. If they're fine with it, and don't feel objectified then who are we to judge? Also, the irony of a middle aged man telling the women they are "wrong" in this thread, and that the MAN knows better is bloody hilarious too. And sad. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
it really all depends on the environment. Will it be professional or seedy
|
Quote:
But like I said I think you're still a relatively young man so it's not really possible to say how you'll see it when you're approaching middle age. I hope for the best. Don't be like this lot :joker:. |
Quote:
They're dressed to show off their cleavage and legs; you do understand that, surely. And it's not even that there's anything wrong with that in itself. It's the reason for it, and the intended audience, that makes it an issue. It is inherently seedy. |
Quote:
The majority of men find young women attractive. That doesn't need to be pervy and seedy like you are implying. Some might say it says more about you than it does about others. To suggest that that older men can't find young people attractive and interesting without lusting after them is insulting |
Quote:
If it "says more about me" that I never even slightly view 20 year olds as someone that I would have any non-platonic interest in whatsoever then I will gladly accept what it "says" about me, and I hope you're wrong that "most men" aren't looking at them with non-platonic attraction, but hey, I suspect you're probably right. Which is grim. Grim. |
Christ alive, if infantilising grown women was an Olympic sport QB would take gold, this is actually some insanely infantile, teenage twitter sjw nonsense
|
Quote:
It's also an aside because the dart "walk-on girls" would be exploitative, gross and misogynistic no matter what age the women were. It's just an additional level of slime that 60 year old men want it to be women in their late teens and early 20's. A similar slime to middle-aged-men wining and dining teenage boys, funnily enough. |
Also not going unnoticed that the one time Liam is aligning with the older forum chaps - who he's usually out in full riot gear to combat - is when it's to defend male exploitation, objectification and commoditisation of women.
"lol". Like I said, OnlyFans all over again. :idc:. |
Tbf you do keep hammering home the 'could be their children' point and called them nonces so that is a bit infantilising to equate it with paedophilia. Most walk on girls are probably mid to late 20s
Edit - in fact the ones in question here are mid 30s! |
You’re coming across really unhinged like you do around any subject of sex or women doing whatever they want to, you seem to have a massive problem with women living their lives however they want to, your vision of what women should be and what they should do perfectly align with the old sexist chaps and the likes of Tate you’re regularly railing against.
It’s incredibly condescending to tell adult women that they’re naive or being exploited if they chose to do a career you believe is immoral because you have an obscured sense of purity and morality |
Quote:
|
Daniella Allfree and Charlotte Wood are the two walk on girls who'll be doing this event. Google thinks they're 36 years old
|
Don’t look at the 36 year old children! They’re being exploited!
|
"Being against the objectification and hypersexualisation of women is sexist! Saying that porn and prostitution is the prime example of objectification and commoditisation of women is actually denying them the right to choose a career!!!"
...shouted the fellowship of male TiBB members, in newly found harmony... How the tables turn eh Liam :joker:. Don't worry, I was already aware that being a "SWERF" isn't au fait with the community. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Funnily enough though... ...it is usually younger men being objectified and turned into a trading commodity... ......and it is usually older fellows doing the buying. ;) Free Market Capitalism at it's finest, you old Tory you :joker: |
A thread where SB/TS/QB thought he could freely hate on white middle aged men (again) has turned into an expose of his hateful intolerance of well, just about anyone man and woman..
Its always the self-proclaimed "liberals" who end up being the actual bigots... :skull: |
Quote:
[edit] FFS I've just realised who you are under a new name :rolleyes: I was hoping you were in one of Starmer's cells. Is that why you've gone incognito, or is it just 'cos of that thread where everyone said your old name sounded like a butt dildo? |
Yes, treating women who choose certain careers like they don’t have the agency of adult women to choose those careers because they’ve obviously been abused or manipulated into doing the careers by evil, exploitative men is sexist and demeans adults abilities to make their own decisions.
You seriously become quite deranged whenever you discuss these things, you’re always high and mighty about everything you post about, but this takes it to the next level |
Quote:
|
And unsurprisingly he ventures off into thinly veiled homophobia, like he does whenever he gets challenged on his opinions by gay men
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.