A quick explanation of omicrom compared to the past variants.

The past variants made their way into the lower part of the lung, causing the patient to basically drown.(lung conaolidation)

Omicrom remains in the tubes going into the lung( the bronchial passages), causing bronchial problems.


So what this means is we spew out the omicrom easier by coughing more, and sneezing. But the benefit off it is, the fact that it remains sticky in the passageways, to stop the big covid getting down to the bottom of the lung.

Your first 2 jabs made your body do this itself, so be brave, get another jab.


(In short, our bodies are causing omicrom as a defence against the covid. The injections gave it the clue)



Dr parmy.

It won't dare come near my smoke filled lungs.

It wont, smoking is a plus against covid believe it or not.

Sadly that suppressed Monday infections figure suggests to me that we will be close to 100,000 infections tomorrow or Wednesday at the latest


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

No I mean the medical care the sick Covid people will now need will have to be paid for ...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I'm not sure about omicrom though, your lungs might need the air getting a clearer passage to your failing tar riddled organ.:shrug:

Sat / Sunday / Monday figures are ALWAYS lower than the actual ones and as such they can’t be taken that seriously imho


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

an exponential infection doesnt drop on the weekend. % infected doesnt drop in the most infected area unless its peaked there

I'm going to dodge my booster, for now.

I think if we have to much our bronchial passageways will block up to much from our own defences, causing us to die en mass, just as intended.

I remember not being able to get my 2nd jab a day before it's due date..then all of a sudden they have halved the waiting time for the booster..seems a bit off to me..

So I will wait about until march, as it seems like the month that matters most years

The only reason they had high wait times between each jab was because they wanted to get as many people jabbed as possible

They should have scared the **** out of us way back then, then. Cause the uptake of the booster in the past few days has been astronomical.

It’s not the actual infections that drop on Sat / Sun / Monday ... it’s the recording of the stats that is effected . They’ve been noticeably lower on those three days since the damn infection appeared


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

That’s a bad way to think, you already had two doses and put your faith in the vaccine, get your booster mate

BBC Text:
[Boris Johnson "faces cabinet deadlock"
over more Covid curbs before Christmas.
The paper says the PM faced a
"wave of cabinet opposition"
to new restrictions which have forced
him to shelve decisions including
a potential post-Christmas "circuit breaker"
until ministers have seen new data.]

https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cp...702_ft2112.png

Yes I totally agree .

I have a few workmates who could have had the booster last week but chose to wait until after Christmas so they weren’t poorly over the festive break !!
So they’re drastically under covered over this crucial next two weeks !!

Unbelievable

Look Parmy
Just go Very Early
Get in the Front of the Line

Heard one of those friend of a friend rumours last night..

Apparently loads and loads of young people (under 35) are having strokes and / or blood clots after having a vaccine jab BUT as soon as it’s reported on social media the authorities take it down ...


One of our friends is seriously scared now despite all our reasoning and reassurances .

It sounds like a load of complete bollox to me plus the idea of the government having a system in place to delete any damaging rumours also seems preposterous


Thoughts please .. or any arguments we can use to try and calm her down

Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Google translate: But as soon as unsubstantiated bollocks is posted on social media it is rightly removed.