ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Jimmy Savile: New Report Claims He Performed Sex Acts On Dead Bodies (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=213236)

Pyramid* 21-10-2012 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 5557695)
Which end of the stick have you got now ..... :conf:


Och.. that could poss be the stick that I suggested hundreds of posts ago Omah, that said victims, chose to keep schtoon, because they were benefitting from being 'paid' ;... that they chose to accept such payments for keeping their traps shut.

You seem to think that is ok.

In my book: that is far worse: given that those persons were in a position to benefit from such '' abuse vs blackmail'' in comparison to those in a more lowly beneficiariary position - given that the latter did not have direct access to such threatning expose.

Money talks Omah in very quiet ( I can be bought for a price) circles.

If the financial reward is high enough, to a person able to cause the most upset: then both parties are at least are equal in their collusion.


re the money grabbing opportunist- through life whe JS was alive but was too much a coward to say so then: aint gona win win my sympathy coz he's dead and she aint got a living breathig cash cow anymore. she's worse than any real victim: because THOSE SORTS allegedly KNEW what was going on, but were happy to allow it to cointine, happy to allow others to be a terrible future in all of this: because they were in a position of POWER - a power to possibly expose: which they chose to ignore: allowing years of subsequent abuse to continue : why? Becuase they were a beneificary AND THEY ENJOYED THAT POWER.

If I am honest: that sort ARE WORSE than an sexual prediator

Omah 21-10-2012 06:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 5557782)
Och.. that could poss be the stick that I suggested hundreds of posts ago Omah, that said victims, chose to keep schtoon, because they were benefitting from being 'paid' ;... that they chose to accept such payments for keeping their traps shut.

You seem to think that is ok.

In my book: that is far worse: given that those persons were in a position to benefit from such '' abuse vs blackmail'' in comparison to those in a more lowly beneficiariary position - given that the latter did not have direct access to such threatning expose.

Money talks Omah in very quiet ( I can be bought for a price) circles.

If the financial reward is high enough, to a person able to cause the most upset: then both parties are at least are equal in their collusion.


re the money grabbing opportunist- through life whe JS was alive but was too much a coward to say so then: aint gona win win my sympathy coz he's dead and she aint got a living breathig cash cow anymore. she's worse than any real victim: because THOSE SORTS allegedly KNEW what was going on, but were happy to allow it to cointine, happy to allow others to be a terrible future in all of this: because they were in a position of POWER - a power to possibly expose: which they chose to ignore: allowing years of subsequent abuse to continue : why? Becuase they were a beneificary AND THEY ENJOYED THAT POWER.

If I am honest: that sort ARE WORSE than an sexual prediator

Who are you talking about?

Who was getting "paid" by Savile, apart from his sister, the granny who died 3 years before him?

Name names, list the benefits, monetary or otherwise - give us the links to corroborate your assertions ..... :idc:

Pyramid* 21-10-2012 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omah (Post 5557861)
Who are you talking about?

Who was getting "paid" by Savile, apart from his sister, the granny who died 3 years before him?

Name names, list the benefits, monetary or otherwise - give us the links to corroborate your assertions ..... :idc:

Tut tut OMAH... we ALL READING this thread ,know what happened the last time you began spouting such drivel !!

sister and granny...by your OWN self admission were spouting this drivel: THE O NES WHO CONTINUED ALL THEIR LIVES TO BENEFIT FINACIALLY IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER FROM JS'S CELEBRITY STATUSAND FINANCES.......................

by jove Omah: you win the Tibb aware for OWN GOAL. :D

Pyramid* 21-10-2012 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 5557765)
just to add a twist to this!
i think that in the sixty's,young girls where seen as one of the perks of being famous!,just like famous bands at the time and more than likely still going on,how many of them have had young girls coming to their dressing rooms.
obviously this is not me making it or thinking it to be right!

Of course it was.

Groupies they used to be called.

aka: sluts regardless of age; who were willing to shag anything if they thought it might get them out of the ****ty council estates.

No different from today: only the name changes: instead of groupies: they are called 'wannabees......

arista 21-10-2012 09:28 PM

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg

Omah 22-10-2012 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyramid* (Post 5557889)
Tut tut OMAH... we ALL READING this thread ,know what happened the last time you began spouting such drivel !!

sister and granny...by your OWN self admission were spouting this drivel: THE O NES WHO CONTINUED ALL THEIR LIVES TO BENEFIT FINACIALLY IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER FROM JS'S CELEBRITY STATUSAND FINANCES.......................

by jove Omah: you win the Tibb aware for OWN GOAL. :D

Abuse does not answer the question - your failure to supply an answer loses the debate for you.

:shrug:

arista 22-10-2012 09:33 AM

http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/...e_2370680b.jpg
BBC director-general George Entwistle
will be accused by his own journalists
of misleading the public
in Panorama tonight. (BBC1 Tonight 10:35PM)


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...integrity.html


Busy 2 days for the BBC Boss
who has only just started his job.

Lee. 22-10-2012 09:40 AM

I'm ****ing sick of hearing about Saville! He can never be brought to justice, so what is the point in it all??
I will say though, that all these people that new what was going on and didn't speak up until now should be ashamed of themselves!

Lee. 22-10-2012 09:41 AM

I'm ****ing sick of hearing about Saville! He can never be brought to justice, so what is the point in it all??
I will say though, that all these people that new what was going on and didn't speak up until now should be ashamed of themselves!

billy123 22-10-2012 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee. (Post 5559213)
I'm ****ing sick of hearing about Saville! He can never be brought to justice, so what is the point in it all??
I will say though, that all these people that new what was going on and didn't speak up until now should be ashamed of themselves!

It will just fade into nothing there isnt any other possible outcome.

Omah 22-10-2012 10:17 AM

What The BBC Knew - Panorama - Tonight 2235-2335
 
http://www.radiotimes.com/episode/ss...norama-special

Quote:

Investigation into the recent allegations of child abuse levelled at Jimmy Savile and why the activities of the former DJ, TV presenter and charity campaigner were not exposed before his death in October 2011. With Scotland Yard announcing that the inquiry is now a formal criminal matter, this special edition is likely to include a report on the reasons why a BBC Newsnight probe into his activities was dropped last December.

Omah 22-10-2012 10:24 AM

BBC Savile show rocks BBC boss
 
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...#ixzz2A1QdAABs

Quote:

A DAMNING Panorama probe into the Jimmy Savile scandal piled pressure on BBC boss George Entwistle last night.

The programme — to be shown tonight — reveals Director-General Entwistle was told of the huge impact a Newsnight probe into Savile might have on planned TV tributes to the star.

Entwistle — head of vision at the time overseeing all BBC TV — was even told that if the Newsnight investigation was aired he might have to change the Christmas schedules. The Newsnight programme was scrapped.

JOURNALISTS from Newsnight give their opinions on why programme's probe into scandal was scrapped

The revelations will heap pressure on Entwistle, who is due to answer questions from MPs tomorrow.
One not to miss ..... :idc:

arista 22-10-2012 10:28 AM

Newsnight Editor Peter Rippon is stepping aside
while its debated.

Live on Sky and BBC News


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012...savile-scandal

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/...Rippon-008.jpg
Peter Rippon

Kizzy 22-10-2012 10:31 AM

Maybe it was pressure from those who did or should have known?...
This case throws questions up for the BBC, the police and the people who gave him such power at broadmoor.
There are many that would much rather this stayed shelved i'm sure..

King Gizzard 22-10-2012 10:32 AM

It's weird them playing this out/condemning on their own channel

arista 22-10-2012 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan (Post 5559234)
It's weird them playing this out/condemning on their own channel


Yes well the ITV1HD Docu
showed so much
including the BBC Mess on this.

arista 22-10-2012 10:58 AM

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/vide...ewsnight-video

2mins Video edits from tonights BBC1 Docu.

arista 22-10-2012 09:37 PM

On BBC1HD and BBC1 now

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg
Tuesdays Paper

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg

cassieparis 22-10-2012 10:24 PM

Maybe they - the BBC senior management -wrongly believed that the GBP wouldn't tolerate such a expose on an icon as venerated as JS.
There are others...... but again do WE want to know?

arista 22-10-2012 10:33 PM

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg

Kizzy 22-10-2012 10:44 PM

Well..... that was the biggest damage limitation exercise ever.

bbfan1991 22-10-2012 10:45 PM

Absolutely shocking and more disgusting revelations. I feel sorry for all the victims:(.

Jack_ 22-10-2012 10:50 PM

Murdoch paper in anti-BBC shocker :rolleyes:

Kizzy 22-10-2012 10:51 PM

Sets watch and waits....

Omah 23-10-2012 01:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cassieparis (Post 5560447)
Maybe they - the BBC senior management -wrongly believed that the GBP wouldn't tolerate such a expose on an icon as venerated as JS.
There are others...... but again do WE want to know?

Of course ..... :idc:


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.