it's complete cringe, all read from the auto-cue :laugh:

Clever Baby

That’s pretty standard isn’t it though ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Can’t see much wrong with that ‘opening gambit’ to be honest .. we could have predicted most of that between ourselves.

She was nervous as you’d expect …


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

One of your best ever posts on an issue is that.:joker:

Very well done.

And of course, you spoke up for Andrew Tate when he was being accused and persecuted for that with zero evidence, didn't you. Or did your bias get in the way?

What is your understanding of grooming?

How can you think he didn't groom MM, when it's been outlined by several posters?

It's fairly clear that there's an incorrect perception that "grooming" is "to catch a predator"-style approaching of an underage person with the intent of sexual activity and that if Philip didn't do that, then he didn't groom MM.

And a persistent, stubborn refusal to understand or admit that that's just one form of grooming.

I genuinely blame "The Stonewall Method" for a lot of this infuriating tactic. "If you don't like the information presented, just ignore it entirely and carry on".

More grooming.

Saville was very close to his mum.

Now Live all 3 News Channels
Parliament Committee


The ITV CEO has asked her assistant to give the timeline

The Lad Matt is referred as person X


The ITV CEO Carolyn McCall
claims she had no evidence at the time,

they were asking questions

Dame Carolyn has just been asked about an earlier mention of "person X" being asked about the affair 12 times, and whether that amounts to an interrogation.

The questions were asked over a long period of time, she says, "not in one go".

There were a couple of formal meetings had with HR, but there were multiple informal meetings.

"The motive was to help person X" as the rumours were rife with inappropriateness at the time, which is why he was asked.

He had a good relationship with someone in production he trusts, Dame Carolyn says, and this person was the one saying "if we can help, please say anything".

--------------------------------------------

If he was asked 12 times, i think they could have drawn their own conclusions :laugh:

If holly thinks shes got away with this then she can think again.

Lets face it if Phils bro wasn't arrested and convicted, this would be a non story, its interesting how it all went away 2 years ago only to return once his brother went to court

[Phillip Schofield looks glum as
he’s spotted amid reports his ex-lover will
‘have his say’ over affair in ITV probe]

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbi...tted-ex-lover/

Good Younger Matt
can tell ITV what it was like
having sex with the TV presenter
in the dressing room.

Finally! Spill the tea Matthew.

Yes he is innocent

Slight tangent


https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...135a59559a.jpg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Still waiting for these grooming allegations to come into existence…

the grooming is clear for anyone not pre-indoctrinated to see

i "think" you mean

Philth has not been proved in a court of law that he groomed the small boy he groomed?

either that or the word allegation is new to you

Nah you're not.

No criminal charges or accusations have been brought forward… like I say, still waiting.