Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11170327)

Describing it as "unwatchable" is an interesting choice of words, too. Is this reality TV to you?

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11170330)

I think the sad truth is that it's being spoonfed to the public as a trashy episode of Judge Judy, but it actually has very real consequences.

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11170331)

She hasn't objected as much as Heard's team, before a witness even speaks they're shouting OBJECTION. I saw a bit where Elaine didn't even know why she was objecting, she was hmm and argh ing. And then her excuse was. " if they keep talking" .

But overall I hate the constant OBJECTIONS, who ever is doing it ,as it makes the trial nearly unwatchable.

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 11170335)

it's a legal process, not a favourite soap :laugh:

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 11170334)

Consequences for whom? Will it impact my life in any way?

Originally Posted by Nicky91 (Post 11170323)

please no, she needs to be locked up in a isolation cell and the key thrown away

a mentally ill woman like her is a danger to society



her on CBB would make me not follow that until she's evicted

Originally Posted by Liam- (Post 11170349)

Elaine is an absolute disaster, it’s starting to make me feel the tiniest little bit of sympathy for Turd :joker:

Originally Posted by Alf (Post 11170340)

I got no problem with people watching it, if that's what interests you then why not? I just find it odd that this case has gripped so many people. I understand it's a celebrity but that's not a selling point for me.

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 11170396)

Objection....this fool will change his mind tomorrow.

Originally Posted by Nicky91 (Post 11170506)

wrong, i will never change my mind on this pathological liar of a woman


no sir i didn't write it

yes i wrote that book


what is the truth gurl, and ur now lying under oath anyway :joker:

Originally Posted by Zizu (Post 11170476)

I think it’s simply because Amber is acting so strangely plus her team appear to be completely inept ( laughably so ) ..

In contrast JD is presenting himself extremely well as us his team


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Originally Posted by Nicky91 (Post 11170337)

that heard woman deserves to rot, take away everything from her

she deserves to suffer, hope she will get most painful illnesses possible

would be nice karma for what she did to try to ruin Daddy Johnny's career

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11170680)

AH took a pill in the courtroom , could just be an aspirin but who knows :suspect: .

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 11170216)

I've seen plenty of it - the question was never "did she write it about him", this was bizarrely suggested as some sort of "gotcha" a few days ago ... she openly admitted it was about him right at the beginning of the trial.

The question is, is there enough doubt to say that what she wrote could be true. She does not have to prove that it IS true, there only has to be enough to say that it COULD be true. We are in big, biiig trouble if people can no longer speak out about abuse without fear of being sued for libel unless they have "concrete" proof.

The facts of the case are incredibly basic...

- They clearly had a messy, violent and controlling relationship all round (recorded evidence of both being manipulative, controlling and aggressive)

- She wrote about a messy relationship


...it's not libel. They had a messy relationship. And in terms of damages against him - they'd have been FAR less if he'd just left it all alone, but he didn't he tried to sue The Sun (and failed) and that opened a massive can of worms that led to this.

Originally Posted by ThomasC (Post 11170898)

Wow :shocked::shocked:

If anything she is mentally ill and your comments are just disgusting.

Originally Posted by ThomasC (Post 11170900)

Probably s mint.

I don't get your point. Both teams do. I imagine being in close contact you're not going to want to have bad breath

Originally Posted by GoldHeart (Post 11171059)

Oh yeah could be an innocent mint ,but who knows .

Also she's been writing fake notes ,did you know?. A camera zoomed in one of her papers and it was just random gibberish of numbers & something about "number 1".

So people speculate that could be code for her trying to find a jury member, who will believe her the most .. Aka her "number 1" .

Originally Posted by ThomasC (Post 11171064)

:joker: really!?

It's more likely a technique to help with stress

I'm not just going to slate her for absolutely no reason other than what the evidence proves and her behaviour.