which is ironically what she was accusing marcus/freddie and siavash of doing..

so what we have so far is david telling bea its good that she is being honest,and she considers that being mean and horrible to her?freddie thinks bea's negative and thats seen as freddie being horrible and mean,marcus tells her not to be so negative and thats seen as him bullying her,but bea calling freddie a twat,a pensioner and a nuisance is fine even when the guy is not there to defend himself?


k i just needed that clearing,what was i thinking,ofcourse bea is this big ball of positivity and marcus/freddie have her all wrong... :rolleyes:

:thumbs: :hello:

Thing is, Marcus could have said so much more about how she used to slag off her new friends Lisa and Davis. I hope this is coming in part 3.

Charlie thinks this is going to be shown and wants some highlights action. Bea and Charlie are as phoney as it's possible to be. She can’t squeeze a tear out

I don't think Bea had a 'win' ... she did the tear thing 'en queue' though.

I'll give her 10 for effort lol

Difference is... he won't give a ****, Bea does. You're a very negative person proximo... are you related to Bea?

Just watched part 2 and OMG that woman is horrible, I hope Marcus stays because like him or not (and up to now I didnt like him) he tells it like it is

Yes I thought she was a good actress but can't do the basic cry scene properly. All she is doing is screwing her face up and dabbing with her tissue! She is the fake:conf2:

PART 3 http://www.mrmarky.co.uk/index.php?o...article&id=113

Oh you're all going to love Marcus by the end... :hello:

LOL very "strong and intelligent" she does not like what she hears so she turns on the tears and calls it bullying?? Marcus was calm, his body language was passive, his voice not raised and he said absolutely nothing offensive. She simply did not like what he said. He was spot on with his observation about her self-image being cast in stone, and no evidence to the contrary will be noticed by her. She calls herself a positive person and so whatever she does she will believe it by telling everyone including herself. That is self-delusion.

Spot on, dudey. She is just a giant ball of contradiction wrapped in a human looking shell. The only way Marcus could've improved his analysis would've been to bring up how she did the exact same thing she did to him then (calling him out for bullying) as she did to David. When she doesn't like what people are saying this seems to be her escape clause.

At the end of part 2 when bea went "are you happy now", to marcus, did anyone want him to say yes?

i think freddie is definatly going now :sad:

If I hear Bea say the word "negativity" again...

Oh this is amazing! She is in floods of crocodile tears (invisible ones at that) and says to Marcus "If you can't take it, don't give it out" !! The gall of the woman!

BTW - Many, many thanks to the OP for posting this, it is hugely appreciated. It seems I switched off just a few minutes too soon last night and missed all this.

Good work! :thumbs:

Ok, while I feel that Charlie has a blatant agenda in his attack of Freddie, I do understand slightly where he's coming from. What did Freddie think would come of him getting involved? Silly move.

same here, and "I'm really, really upset!"

"Mindlessly horrible to people", sounds like a fairly accurate characterisation.

And what the hell is it with Bea saying, "If you can't take it then don't dish it out"? She's got a brass neck, I'll say that.

Charlie playing the mum card once again............

Charlie's voice... :bored:

Charlie is driving me crazy. He never stops trying to talk over the top of people.

Freddie should have stayed well out of it. However, I can sort of understand why he might react to the line "If you can't take it then don't dish it out".

what a nasty piece of work Charlie is too

he picks one word and then launches an attack based on assumptions ... and now he is saying he is "really, really upset"!