I am talking about record labels here, and record label branches of larger corporations, not other channels of media. Dozens of record labels are going out of business, dozens already have. It's not for you to agree or disagree with, it's just a plain fact.

Well if you care about the smaller lads you should be delighted in knowing they made an impression like never before this decade thanks to the internet. It is far easier to break into music now than it was fifty years ago when you had to know somebody. Harder to sell records, yes, but easier to get into music.

As for stealing is stealing? Bullshit. I have already explained this to you a dozen times. How on earth could you consider stealing from a major artist on a major label the same thing as stealing from a struggling artist on an independent label? Stealing is only stealing in principal.

As for embrace it? Again your putting yourself on a moral pedestal. I am not embracing illegal activity, I am embracing the benefits of downloading while recognising the drawbacks. And I am not the only one. Take Radiohead, for instance. They had they're finger firmly on the button and so do many other artists who would disagree with you and say it's important to embrace this change because it's not stopping. Major labels have lost out this decade because they have been slow to embrace change.

I don't think we will be loosing out on many interesting artists either, chief. I think I am hearing slightly more artists now than when I did before I had the use of the internet.

But why get into music if you lose out from it eventually? Hardly the type of incentive that's necessary to motivate young, creative minds.

As for Radiohead, yes, they asked their fans to give what they could for the new album, not to just grab for free. But of course they've already made their fortune and are in a more fortunate position than many other struggling artists.

You hear more music... that's nice. Do you pay for that privilege? Obviously not. Do I think that it will have a massive impact in years to come? Yes, big time.

You don't. Not if your smart. Adaptation.

Again, this decade has seen the biggest influx of struggling artist turned star increase ever. All thanks to the internet. Why don't you ask Elbow if they are loosing out.

Careful with the assumptions, kid. I buy albums. I never said I didn't. Of course it will have an impact in years to come. And in my opinion it's going to be a very positive one. More and more artists breaking through thanks to the internet, more and more existing artists realising it's smarter to switch to independent labels, increasing live sales, cheaper albums, artists getting more profit than what they normally would have in the pre download era, so on and so forth.

The future looks bright.

I really don't think so. You'll see less and less people becoming artists nevermind being willing to shell out cash for the honour of producing and distribuiting albums that people will never buy anyway. Do you know how expensive it is?

And you keep mentioning artists that have made it big... what about the ones who haven't and the others who condemn the theft of their work off the net?

I agree that the internet is hugely important in the fight against the tyranny of corporate airheads who feed us the usual mainstream rubbish and monopolize airtime but that doesn't make downloading for free right. You can play the crusading Robin Hood role if you like, but it doesn't hold water for me when you're consuming other people's creativity for nothing.

Baseless, factless assumption. More people have broke through this decade than ever before, all down to the benefits of the internet. More people want to be artists than ever before. We are, also thanks to the internet, hungry for more and more types of experimental music and the labels are starting to listen. More people want to be famous more than ever, too. This concept that illegal downloading is discouraging people from wanting to be artists is quiet frankly utterly hilarious and without validity, regardless of your opinions on illegal downloading itself.

Seriously, can you read? I have mentioned at least sixteen times now that I recognize and acknowledge the harmful effects it is having on the industry. I merely believe, with fact's and figures in lieu of daft assumptions and guesswork, that the benefits of downloadable music far outweigh the negatives, and will rise to fruition even more visibly in the future.

I never said it was right. I was shedding light on it's beneficial effects. It's such a shame your basing your arguments around tedious statement making without facts and poor assumption.

Well it's hardly an attraction, particularly when you hear of famous artists not even bothering to release anymore because of illegal downloading. Your argument is based on the internet providing a platform for many new artists, which I agree on - I've always said that. What I disagree with is illegal downloading not being harmful and not stealing, which it most certainly is. That's what this thread is about for f cuks sake. It's not about the pros and cons of the internet; it's about the right and wrongs of taking from others for nothing.

And it's not guesswork, it kinda obvious that production values on albums will fall as a result of people not actually buying anymore. Downloading for free is theft, no matter what spin you choose to put on it. I'll leave the final word to Cinematic Orchestra here, who work on an independent record label from a year or two ago.

"Before you copy, burn or upload these recordings, please take a moment to think about what you're doing and what you're not doing. You are not 'sticking it to the man'. You are not 'striking a blow against outdated copyright laws'. You are not 'liberating content from the corporations'. Nor are you 'promoting our records for us'. You are making it much harder for the musicians in Cinematic Orchestra to make anything like a living wage for creating the music which is good enough to give to friends and associates."

:dance:

Some 'artists' they are.

And who exactly might you be disagreeing with? Because I never said it was not harmful and I never said it was not stealing.

This thread is about illegal downloading. I am talking about the pros and cons of illegal downloading. Shoot me.

So when album sales fall the big wigs sit around a table and say ''right lads, less effort into the next project. That will get the punters buying again''? Please don't ever work for me. Wrong, the opposite will happen. In fact, the opposite is already happening. These days you can get all sorts of extra tracks and bonus DVD's with your CD's for making a legit purchase. Thousands of artists are adapting to change and are coming up with new and exciting ways to get people to buy the albums. Labels realise they have to both drop the price and offer more. Production values are falling? That's a killer.

Marvelous. Because I was not putting a spin on it.

Again, you persist with chopping and pasting other people's words. Can't you just answer without grabbing segments of my thoughts in attempt to big up yourself?

And standards will fall.... like I said it's incredibly expensive to produce and distribute music. You're whole argument is based on the fact that you want the little man to do well out of this but I can't see it happening if this trend continues. You'll see a drop in musicians wanting to release material and the quality will decrease too as they find it more and more difficult to break even in their investment. Cinematic Orchestra said it better than I ever will.

Did you expect me to change my posting style just to appease your childish little bouts of virtual paranoia? I have already been through this with you countless times. How on earth is dividing my argument meant to big me up?

It is getting cheaper to produce music. Standards will increase as people will strive to make other people buy the product. Simple business economics. And like I already said, you can see the standards increasing with relation to the disc format all around.

It's always going to be difficult and an expensive process to produce, record and distribute music of a high technical standard. That will never change.

Difficult? Yes. Expensive? Yes. But it is getting cheaper. That's all I was saying. That also happens to be a fact.

It's not fact. It costs a fortune to get a cd out there and you wont see as many artists being willing to fork out the cash when there's no market for it. Sound recording and distribution is a time consuming and expensive business.

Which is getting cheaper. I never said it was a fact that it was cheap. I said it was a fact that it was getting cheaper. Which, like everything else, it is, as technology improves. Read.

Nope, even with technology it's still time consuming and expensive, and that's only in creating your album. Distribution is another massive headache and advertising.

Jesus christ.

I never said it was not time consuming or expensive. I said it was getting cheaper and more efficient, which it is. As technology improves, it can be produced and thus sold for cheaper. As technology improves, it also speeds up otherwise difficult processes.

Producing a named electronic album today is about a third of the cost of producing the same album ten years ago, which was a third of a cost of producing it ten years prior.

You do realise how many albums these smaller bands have to sell before breaking even don't you? Thousands man. They wont even bother now that people are stealing off them for nothing. Again, I've mentioned this before and I have friends who work in sound recording. Its still expensive and time consuming and you're clutching at straws here anyway. This is theft, plain and simple. Anyway, I'm done here.

I do download music and TV series like Big Brother UK & USA, GG, Lost, DH. If I'm a fan of some artist then I'll go buy the cd.

I am clutching at straws? Do you even know what straws I am clutching at? My point is and always was that illegal downloading has provided the industry with both positives and negatives. It is theft. Bravo. Give yourself a nice, big pat on the back. I never denied it was theft.

But artists both big and small are not going to stop making music because of it. Fact.

haha

stu and setanta


you both know that there is only ONE way to settle this...

There's that famous sarcy and dismissive tone again. It's dull Stu.

I'm done here.

:rolleyes:

Shoooooot offfffff:laugh:

Not only did I put it in intentionally to create irony, which you just completely missed out on, but you created your own additional little piece of irony by being sarcastic in a post dismissing sarcasm. Well done.

Old style western showdown? I'm game :blush:.

don't say "shoot off" to Stu, he'll get the wrong ide-

*runs for cover from flying white stuff*