informer you're beginning to sound like a snob.

Yes, I am aware of that. I don't see what it has to do with anything.

Would you physically attack a neighbour over a fence?

Well Sisqo is guilty of statutory rape

You're hearing one side of a misconstrued story. Who's to say the neighbor didn't instigate things?

And you can clearly see that the blood has spread/been smeared around his face.

i think the fact vinnie has and will always been known as a violent thug proves it wasnt instigated by the neighbour

rape is forced, i think the girl was underage..that isnt rape if she consented..

im not happy with sisqo but its possible that he thought she was older?

I do defend Sisqo on this but rape and statutory rape are different.

He has 2 convictions for violent assault, plus been in a brutal bar brawl and bit the nose of a Mirror journalist. That's at least 4 violent incidents tht we know of.

I reject your notion of the past, it's a license for everyone in the world to be violent and excuse themselves of their actions because some time has elapsed.

How does it? Surely proof would be a statement to that effect, not just a reputation. But hey when has the truth ever bothered you Gazza?

I couldn't care if you 'reject my notion' :rolleyes: The fact is we're not talking aboiut how the legal system works.

And Mirror journalists need more than bite on the f-ing nose!

Dont show your ignorance Paul.

He was found guilty.

You said it didn't matter, that's an opinion. In law it does matter, that's a fact.

Good to see you understand how the law works, he actually plead guilty, and his plea of guilty was accepted by the court as was his statement of mitigation.

When did I say his previous convictions wouldn't matter in a court of law? I didn't, don't put words in my mouth. What I did say was that we're not talking about law here.

Sends a chill down the spine of any decent human being hearing those incidents of violence

He plead guilty = he was found guilty. There's no distinction in law wrt guilt.

You said it didn't matter, do you want me to quote you?

So he is guilty of crime? thats all we need to know..thanks

Go ahead. :rolleyes:

Once again incorrect, if you go to trial and then plead guilty before a decision is made as to your guilt, you will receive a lesser sentence than if you go to trial pleading innocence and then get found guilty.

I would say it may be a technicality but it is a distinction in law.

You can't be found guilty if you've pleaded it.

The fact he has assaulted other human beings which makes him an animal in most peoples books

It's not, there's no distinction wrt guilt. For example you'll get a life sentence if you commit murder, whether you plead guilty or are found guilty.