This thread is getting a little too personal, don't you think?

:dog:

yup. I think it has drifted off the original point somewhat.

With regards the link you supply, I can assure you that is not me, I have never heard of that site. What are you doing frequenting such a site, in any case?? Instead of trawling the Internet for namesakes, why not get better things to do?

Your post does not really make any sense. Its just random answers, without referencing my questions.

So because my opinion doesent agree with the majority, then I am wrong? Music taste is a personal choice, so I shan't change my opinion on Madonna purely because you would prefer me to do so.

My friends are not too impressed with the Arctic Monkeys, yet I like them a lot- am I wrong?

Youve still ignored my opinions on women. To suggest I dont like women because Im not a fan of Madonna is, lets be honest, pathetic. What do others think of this claim, based on not being a Madonna fan?? It would be intersting to hear.

Okay, it's just someone that has the same member name, same location in their profile (although the location was rather suspiciously changed shortly after I made this post), likes the same women, etc. - definitely not you at all. It's a site for celebrity images, which I came across from a Google image search. I noticed your account - sorry, the account which isn't yours at all - when I had a look around the site itself.

It makes perfect sense to me, and I'd imagine most others, too. I wasn't aware that I was under interrogation, though.

No, it doesn't, but it does however greatly enhance the probability.

I've really no idea. I'll reply in several years' time, if I think on.

Because they were never relevant to anything I've posted in this thread, at any juncture. What's really pathetic is the fact that you continue claiming I've said things I've never said. Now you're trying to drag others into the debate you decided to make into an argument, once again. This happens when you express an opinion on a forum or message board; you run the risk of encountering disagreement every bit as much as you're likely to garner agreement. There really never was any need for the voracious overreaction, especially when I was hardly alone in disagreeing with you. It really has become extremely tedious, but at the same time I don't intend to be brow-beaten into submission for expressing an opinion that's shared by the majority, either.

Likes the same women? Which women do I like? And where is the proof?

I really dont care if you think it is me or not, Ive got more important things on my mind.

This really is getting boring..........

Going back to the original subject, it has nowt to do with age or sex. For example, Kate Bush is the same age as Madonna and has brought out a stonking new album. She is one artist who has got better with age. I just think that Madonna has ben getting worse over the years, which is of course my opinion. I have never said its a fact.

As for being 'past it', boybands would look pretty silly going on for ages. Look at Boyzone and Take That- they split whilst they could still be believably called 'boys', whereas the Backstreet Boys are mostly over 30, which surely is too old to be a boyband? (Though they would laughably call themselves a 'vocal group'!)

By the way- if you took the Abba sample of Hung Up, it would be a pretty ordinary song.

What's the big deal with age/ The Backstreet Boys are still very successful both in Northern America and Europe. Just because they have members over 30 if they still have fans and have a passion to produce music then why deny them that? I hardly think them being called a 'vocal group' is laughable seeing as they have a more mature sound these days.