Macie Lightfoot |
18-03-2012 06:17 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostalex
(Post 5027513)
Look, stop arguing, Natalie was a weak player, that's WHY she made it to the final. Everyone knows that bringing a weak player to the final increases your chances of winning, and the the only reason that Natalie made the final was because Russell saw her as a weak player and thought "there's no way anyone would vote for her over me". So he CARRIED her to the end.
Obviously Russell underestimated the jury's hate for him. That jury would have voted for Osama Bin Laden over him they hated him so much.
|
You pretty much just defined why Natalie isn't a week player :joker: She certainly came across as nonthreatening, but perception isn't reality. Certainly she's not the best player ever, but she's definitely the best of her season. She saw how the whole season would work right away and adapted to it. Russell had to beat 16 people, Natalie had to beat 1, and she did so rather easily at that. Russell could've taken Jaison, Mick, and Liz into the merge and maybe things would've been different. Natalie charmed the pants off of Russell and that's what makes her dangerous! Russell didn't see that, brought Natalie along, and what did she do? Charm the pants off of Galu.
You think Russell UNDERESTIMATED the Jury's hate for him? He was BLIND to it! How can someone be the best player ever if they could never, ever win a Jury vote. Like you said, they would've voted for Osama bin Laden over him. How does that make you a good player?
|