http://www.barstoolu.com/#random-tho...s-hit-the-web/

may Not be Legal to post
Remove if not

she's definitely "cross-eyed" lol

i'm just joking, she's beautiful. I'm sure most women would kill to have her body. She's got nothing to be ashamed of.

:(

because I want everyone to know how pathetically shallow we as a society as , how controlled and manipulated , like mindless heartless sheep. it is beyond pitiful. we care more about some photo of one of the richest people in the world, over the abusive deaths of our fellow country men. this drivel dhouldnt even be in the news. we need to repiroritise whats most important in this country. celebrity photos is not one of them. the abusive death killings in our hospitals should , as any sane person would agree, be given greater priority and attention

Yes but we all know its Shallow.
But its still the Main News item on every news.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...98_308x194.jpg
and other nations are printing her tits.


"this drivel shouldnt even be in the news."
Sure - but it is on Every News
now a legal battle.

Exactly

The Duchess of Cambridge should never have given them something to photograph.

It is her that should be severely reprimanded for her breach of protocol. She should never have been allowed to to get close to his Royal Highness. She should have been told right in no uncertain terms at the beginning to keep away from His Royal Highness.

As for Arista's point, love should never be allowed to supplant duty. Love should be sent packing if it ever comes close to conflicting with duty.

Remember how Her Royal Highness Princess Margaret dispensed with a man she loved because he was a commoner. She rightly chose duty over love.

His Royal Highness should have been made to ditch Miss Middleton and made to marry a royal from one of the European royal households as was his duty.

As fortunately there is yet no issue, maybe the courtesans at the palace may be able to rectify this terrible mistake, in light of this evidence of her unsuitability to be a royal. A quickie divorce with a statement of how things are not working out, followed by a low key royal wedding of his royal highness to a proper royal princess would be more in order.

"made to ditch Miss Middleton "


No Sticks
you are in a Time Warp.

The Public like her
except , you of course.

If we are to have a royal family, then it must be done according to the well established rules which have stood the test of time through the centuries.

Yes
you can wish for that.

But its Big Money for Photos
And the UK can not order other nations about

I feel bad for Wallace Simpson, she was so horribly abused by the royals :(

When has the British Royal Family EVER had to account for their wrong doings throughout history?

Never. But they have the AUDACITY to take legal action?

Apparently, Richard Desmond of Northern & Shell may be pulling the financial plug on the Irish edition of the Star ..... :idc:

See English Civil War ..... ;)

Well played Omah

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz26Z9jf4y4

The Princess was fined £500 by Berkshire Magistrates' Court and ordered to give Dotty more training.

Prince Charles was divorced and is now married to a divorcee and is still heir to the throne... Prince Michael of Kent is married to a catholic... Prince William married a commoner. Welcome to the 21st Century.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...81_306x457.jpg
Topless, so what? Kate gets the giggles as she is greeted by bare-chested tribal women in Solomon Islands on Royal tour

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz26jMc1oHG

she's probably just preparing to pull her hair back and over the necklace. you can't tell if she's giggling or not.

"you can't tell if she's giggling or not."

She fell into giggling

Tits meets Tits

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...35_306x458.jpg

what are you talking about? you can't even see her face.

The TV Cameras did

but that picture is tryna make it look like she is covering her eyes because she doesn't want to see the breasts, and i seriously doubt that's what she's doing. she's clearly putting her hands up to pull her hair up and over the necklace that was just placed around her..

I can't believe people don't see that immediately. We saw hundreds of women doing the same thing at the olympics, when they put the medal around their necks, they pull their hair back and over the medal that was put around their necks.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...31_306x458.jpg
She stopped after a while

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...71_634x463.jpg
The locals