![]() |
Another very interesting read The Truth.
Actually the glitz and way over the top planning of this funeral is going to be I expect looked on very quickly as a great misuse of any public funding and sadly a rather undignified one too. |
Quote:
|
''meanwhile the majority of steel works and industrial plants she did close, yes and some were very profitable, she dismantled brick by brick and reassembled in africa , where workers were paid peanuts and the tories sat on the board as shareholders.''
This was the real reason for privatisation, take industry and public utilities and split them into nice little earners for other tories. then watch all the lovely kickbacks come rolling in. |
Quote:
To be honest the more I read into the policies and actions of thatcher and her cronies the angrier I become. Before her death I like a lot of people disliked her intensely , but after really examining her policies and the effects of her actions in all their murky shady double dealings I now quite frankly despise the woman and may be heading down to London next week to voice my displeasure. I wish people would do their homework re Thatcher before coming on this forum praising this hideous woman who really has damaged this nation more than most people will ever know....!!!! |
Interesting to hear andrew neils' memory of meeting her at her home for an interview in the 60s when he was a mere journo , he actually mooted to her the idea of making social housing more affordable to the working classes by offering a discount, thatcher looked at neil quizzically saying, "oh no, but that wouldnt help our people" as neil said she of course meant the rich middle classes. that really does say a lot about her greed is good , way of thinking. you can bet the real reason she brought it in was also for selfish reasons ie. get people off housing benefits and also to get them voting for her.
|
|
|
|
Just a thought, all the people that are outraged at the expense of Mrs Thatchers funeral should probably think about the vast amount of money being spent to protect property and generally police it ,it will probably cost more than the funeral itself,but you can bet the 'cost' wont bother them as long as they are getting their rocks off trying to prove what? they didn't like her or agree with her policies,well we all know that already ,but it doesn't stop them getting their 15 mins of fame.Do they think about THAT money that will be used to keep them in order?bet they don't.
|
[QUOTE=Kazanne;5932240]Just a thought, all the people that are outraged at the expense of Mrs Thatchers funeral should probably think about the vast amount of money being spent to protect property and generally police it ,it will probably cost more than the funeral itself,but you can bet the 'cost' wont bother them as long as they are getting their rocks off trying to prove what? they didn't like her or agree with her policies,well we all know that already ,but it doesn't stop them getting their 15 mins of fame.Do they think about THAT money that will be used to keep them in order?bet they don't.[/Q
I'm pretty sure the 10 million price tag includes security Kazanne, I feel her funeral will be a target for every and anyone who feels the need to protest on the day, which to me makes the decision to hold such a public displayf or such a divisive ex leader all the more ridiculous, a misuse of the police and public funds. |
[QUOTE=Cherie;5932267]
Quote:
|
good thanks Kazanne!
|
Well as maggie herself said there is no such thing as free money, it's public money.
Taxpayers money... So seeing as the public paid for this shindig is it not right and fair they are invited? I see the spin that it is only the 'loony lefties' or 'phillpots' that are opposed to this, But wait... on the front pages of the papers, teachers and policemen too! So called 'strivers' ... What on earth can their grievance be? |
Quote:
|
If this had been as Margaret Thatcher it seems herself wanted, a low key, more private and dignified funeral this attention would likely have been avoided at a massively reduced cost too.
I think it is obscene and the fact taxpayers are going to fund any of it will only inflame the anger at it. There was no need at all to have created this show/farce, all that had to be done was what she wanted as with her Husband Dennis's funeral. I find it distasteful that her funeral has been hijacked by her Party and that her family have allowed it to be too. As I said in a previous post, my Parents are lifelong Conservative supporters but they are furious that taxpayers money is being used in any way for a retired PMs funeral. No matter who they are. |
the £10 million price tag is clearly a lie...the entire policing, trafficking, congestion, security, damage incurred, the cost of closing parts of london down etc the figure will be huge and this is why cameron wont discuss it.
her star shone brightly but when the smoke cleared and all the hollow speeches were spoken, we realise there was less to her that met the eye. by this time net month I doubt anyone will want to discuss her much ever again these elitist people wasting tax payers money are plain greedy and selfish hypocrites, the same so called free marketeers who got the pubic to bail out the banks with pubic money? so shes leaving as she lived , all me me me and all paid for by the society she said doesnt exist.. |
Quote:
It hasn't happened yet, who knows if there will be any destruction of property, I am in the hope there may be a peaceful protest, but who can say? People have already been forced out of their jobs for voicing their opinion, Kim Jong Un would be proud of the way we silence critics of fascistic regimes here.... |
Quote:
|
Considering her reign was almost defined by budget cuts and tax rises it seems quite ironic to spend so much on her funeral, I doubt she'd want such a big affair so I don't see the point in doing it in such a way.
|
Quote:
|
|
Have no real problem with it tbh, she was the PM who had the biggest impact on our country since Churchill and I have nothing against acknowledging that fact, she is by no means the first to receive a taxpayer funded funeral and she won't be the last
|
Quote:
Clement Attlee Labour | 1945 - 1951 Clement Attlee enlarged and improved social services and the public sector in post-war Britain; creating the National Health Service and nationalising major industries and public utilities. Clement Attlee was leader of the Labour Party from 1935 to 1955, and served as Britain’s Prime Minister from 1945 to 1951. As Prime Minister, Attlee oversaw the rebuilding of post-war Britain, and the birth of the nation’s Welfare State. More than one survey of academics has voted Attlee the most successful British Prime Minister of all time. http://www.number10.gov.uk/past-prim...lement-attlee/ 20yrs as an excellent reformer and PM, no state funeral... |
Bishop of Grantham : Cost of Thatcher's funeral a 'mistake'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-22125280
Quote:
|
We pay enough taxes to keep the dregs of life in prisons etc,so can't see this will make much of a dent.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:44 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.