![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Blame the woman. She flirted. Therefore she got what she deserved |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I said "equate". You're trying to show how Daley was "humiliated" and had his "private parts" put on show against his will. Two wrongs don't make a right. And yes... if you want to debate the law with me... go for it. But don't insult me, please. |
Quote:
|
Well it will probably mean a big turnaround for Hazel in terms of her unpopularity.
Maybe that's why she's on top of the world today. Potential winner.... in her mind anyway! ;) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Big Brother could have called either of them into the diary at numerous points before it went too far, but they didn't. If they did, it would have stopped right away. It was obvious things were escalating and 'warnable' offences were readily occurring. I guess they thought it was good TV and just went with it. Daley will be held accountable for his actions, the public will know Hazel played it up and contributed to the escalation of the situation as well. But what about Big Brother? Where is the accountability for their actions, or lack thereof?
|
BB deserve to have the book thrown at them, theyre lucky it didn't get worse.
|
Quote:
And yes, while I would say some of her actions may have been questionable, she did not, in any way, deserve to be assaulted. And that's why I suggested some people would have made poor jurors, because the consensus seems to be with some people, that she was in some way asking for it. |
Quote:
Maybe Daley should have thought about all that heart-rending stuff you've spouted before he went sniffing after the model, and then assaulted her. There is nothing funny about this situation. What's funny is your reaction to it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think society views it differently when it's the other way around, but in my view, they can't use double-standards when it comes to warnings and punishments. As long as BB can say that the only thing Daley would have got was a warning had he pulled her shorts down, then it's fair enough that Hazel only got a warning. But, I can't help thinking that they might have ejected a male housemate for doing that.. in which case, Hazel ought to have been ejected for it too. Then again, when Charlie took that thing off Dexter when he was running around the garden, that's the same thing again. There's a very fine line between playing a prank and sexually assaulting someone. :/ |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It's hard to disagree with the OP, so I don't see why people are bringing in Daley's appalling behaviour as an argument against it.
Daley needs some form of re-education for his issues, as I think he's dangerous. Notwithstanding, Hazel should have been ejected too for what she did to Daley. Violence has the potential to be deadly and must be guarded against vigorously but on the other hand some people would rather be given a black eye than have their genitals exposed on television against their will. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I didn't need to research that its common knowledge? |
Actually no. Remember when sam pepper put his crotch in josies face did he get called to the diary room immediately? No! but he still got a warning. I think the producers didn't know it would escalade that much.
|
Guys (or gals?), can we stay on topic? You obviously don't see eye to eye and that's cool, everyone is entitled to their opinion. I don't know if this forum has an ignore function but it might be a good idea to use it and just move on, or maybe take your argument to PM. Just a suggestion.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.