I have a masters in physics, from Prinston, and by the law of *Smithsonian simpleton's* I can assure you that you are all wrong.

Honestly







*not a real thing

Ok :thumbs:

Actually, I work for a political party right now, and in about a month I start my bar training.

One would expect you,from that scenario,to have a better grasp of the real law then in that case,other than the poor one you are demonstrating and being offensive to others as to their knowledge.

Where is this "Prinston" place?

I have a friend who bought PhD from an online university based in Arizona.

He's a baggage handler at Heathrow.

Just outside Hogwarts

I don't honestly think it is I who am demonstrating the poor grasp. It is others who are getting hold of the wrong end of the stick and reading things into what is being said which are not actually being said.

was just wondering, if Daley had said " you **** with me and I will do you" would he have gotten away with it? :joker:

Anyways isn't this thing over yet. For **** sake, he didn't ****ing club her shiaaaat :conf: even charles saatchi got a lighter backlash :conf:

Bradley Manning has just been sentenced to 35 years, you would think all these legal eagles would have better things to waggle their willies over, than this crap.

if you're going to charge him bloody do it already and get it overwith what the **** are you dragging it on for!!

Good luck! I actually instructed Parliamentary Counsel in the drafting of legislation for a number of years. It certainly sharpens you up! I was privileged to have that opportunity.

That's what happens when you expose your nasty side on public TV. He is a serious assault, or worse, waiting to happen that one.

Maybe he just needs 10 blondes and a good seeing to in copacabana.

I love it when real legal experts stop the nonsense that some people spout about this.

Law students? Hardly experts :joker:

Lawyer*

Where?

Livia?

daley
 

Hi livia
Interested to hear that you studied at Cambridge. I work for Cambridge university, but not for the legal dept, or law faculty so dont know much about
the law. Even before the neck grabbing incident, he was behaving strangely over the make up thing for instance. I would like to think that the threat of
legal action would be a bit of wake up call for him, but somehow I doubt it.:xyxwave:

From the CPS website:

On a charge of Common Assault, it is necessary for the prosecution to prove absence of consent: see R v Brown (A.) [1994] 1 A.C. 212, HL. It is possible for a lack of consent to be inferred from evidence other than direct evidence from the victim: see CPS v Shabbir [2009] EWHC 2754 (Admin). Where actual or grievous bodily harm or a wound is caused, however, consent will be no defence in the absence of good reason.

So to make a charge stick on Daley, the CPS would have to prove that Hazel had not consented.

He acted aggressively and as such shouldn't go scot free... however Hazel didn't get so much as a teeny scratch. It is ironic that all this fuss is being made when out there in the big wide world, women are cowering in corners or semi conscious due to the aggressiveness of their men and the police who turn a blind eye because it's 'just a domestic'.

Having a degree in film studies does not make you a film director

What does a "Master's in Physics" from PRINSTON make you?