I guess so, making it the gender divide was stupid too though, there was no need for that..
at the end of the day i dont get how people dislike Jim anyway, i must be one of the few who wants Jim & Luisa to stay in as long as possible..
Luisa was using the role as power though so clearly she was going to be annoyed when Jim would have just made toast, as that would have given her no power over him to make him suffer :')

She was already making food for everyone else.... she told him there was room on the stove for his, then he suggested he cook for half the house... Why? she didn't have an issue with half the house.

Because she was being a childish little bitch and why should he let her single him out like that and act like she's dishing out the punishments? I think he wanted to take some control back from her hissy fit

I agree no one should be left out. Jim idea was good. He was going to cook for half of the housemates, Louisa for the rest. Sounds reasonable to me. :shrug:

No, he said he was going to cook for the boys.

.... because he's a **** stirrer.

He suggested this after Louisa refused to cook for Jim and Lionel.

Which is **** stirring as she was going to cook for Ollie, Lee and Dappy.

Someone on neutral ground should have just stepped in and cooked.. surely the other nine cannot be completely pathetic on the cooking ground lol

Before that in the bedroom he said he was going to cook for everyone cos Luisa had stomped off to bed in a mood but as soon as she heard Jim was cooking she decided to jump up and take over the cooker.

And he probably offered to cook for the boys because she wasn't cooking for Lionel either, Lee was already pissed off with the pettiness and had said that to Luisa but she was still adamant that she was cooking.

Even if people do like Luisa I honestly can't see how the pettiness of her antics can be denied.

No, she said she was not going to cook for Jim and Lionel.

Seems like they are

An utterly self-centred, revolting human being. Thank God for fast forward. I now fast forward every single part of her appearances in the HLs.:dance:

One of the worst housemates EVER.

But sharing the cooking like Jim has suggested seems a good idea. Why should one person do everything?

He and lionel had been insulting her, she gave him the power back... the power to make his own dinner! :laugh:
Jim was childish for not just accepting she was angry and hurt and see to his and lionels without attempting to create more drama.

:conf::conf::conf:

Which means she was cooking for everyone apart from Jim/Lionel.

And that is not fair. No one should be singled out.

Why not share the cooking? Seems like the easiest solution here.

Yeah but on this situation separately that wouldn't have worked, Luisa would have caused an argument, so someone should have just stepped in said ffs, ill do it to stop all the arguments between the two of them
Seen how pathetic Ollie was coming in asking Luisa about the bread, i guess you can add inept at cooking alongside wallflower and bore:hugesmile:

And she had been insulting them as well.

I don't think one person should do all the cooking. They could help each other or share.

Pity there are aren't more people in there with a set of balls to say to Luisa, if you're not cooking for everyone then piss off and let Jim do it, if you don't want to eat his food that's your problem

This lot can't do anything together without arguing. :joker:

I dont understand how her not cooking for jim and lionel is "good tv" :s..

All she said to lionel was 'you wanted the effing chocolate'
Then we were shown lionel screeching about her being an evil selfish bitch in the kitchen, and jim and lionel repeating that to anyone who would listen in the garden.