The point I made about people without family to offer support was dismissed as you felt it wasn't relevant to the discussion, I feel it was as I can't see that when making the decision to provide financial support the government check family histories....Therefore the fact he had a family was irrelevant.
I said 'suggest its acceptable to make blunders' that is not me saying you said the decision of ATOS was acceptable.
I don't feel it's right or acceptable to have to assume that the people in charge of so many life or death decisions are incompetent and incapable, which is why the situation is coming to a head as the faults mount so far that it's impossible for the government to ignore.

I know, yet no one has chose to address my post lol.

I did Daniel,I agreed with all you said and especially your last paragraph.I repeat again,You made an excellent post in my opinion on this issue.