See! You can do it. Well done!

"types of behaviour that can be perceived as bullying"


Is not bullying.

You can't go to Court and be convicted because someone perceives you to be a mass murderer.

:facepalm: You asked for a clip of her receiving a warning where "the word bullying was mentioned".

Nobody said you had to agree it was bullying. It's always going to be a matter of opinion.

Well, physically murdering someone is a more black and white issue I would have thought then deciding what does and does not constitute as bullying, not really comparable Verbal and why on Earth would Big Brother warn someone and use the word bullying if she was doing nothing of the sort? :think:

I said that she has not been warned for being a bully. She hasn't.

Just that some people might perceive her as one.

Doesn't make her a bully.

Her problem is that she hides whatever point she may have in a haystack of shouting, insults and "****ing _____ ****ing _____ YOU ****ING ________"s.

Because people get butthurt and ring Ofcom, which gets them in trouble. Then they have to be seen as taking action.

I disagree, if they were doing what the people wanted they would have kicked her out or atleast revoked her pass by now. Anyway, we're going round in circles here, you don't think she's a vile bully, I do. The End.

You asked for a warning where the "word bullying was mentioned" you got it.

Nobody said it would prove conclusively and make you change your mind.

"You cheeky ****ing bastard" does make me howl though. :laugh:

What I meant was where she was warned for being a bully. I guess it didn't translate from my head in that way.

Because people were complaining and having a meltdown online that whole weekend that they weren't doing anything and it was starting to get media attention so to quieten people down they gave people what they wanted

If she actually was bullying people they'd say 'Big Brother deems this behaviour to be bullying and is issuing you with a formal warning' (there's no interpretation mentioned whenever they are serious about a warning), the fact they said it could be interpreted as bullying speaks volumes about whether they consider it to be IMO and I think it's basically saying 'a lot of the viewers think it's bullying so we're telling you'

That is not true at all, not everyone wants her out. So you do not speak on behalf of 'the people', just a very small section of them.

None of you can debate for toffee, honestly.

Exactly what Jack said.

The end.

:umm2:

I personally wouldn't care if people bitched about me behind my back. It's their problem, not mine.

Helen is a nasty bully, the way she walked out laughing with other girls, making someone feel uncomfortable

"I've seen loads of stuff.. seen people bitching hahahahahaha"
"It was so great to see peoples true colours hahahahah"

before it even happened, Jale, Kim, Helen are ****ing awful

people

the people

There is a difference

I was responding to your post, referring to the same "people" you were talking about :rolleyes:

So what does the inclusion of the word 'the' add to your post? That's right, it implies all people, and gives it a whole different meaning. It would have been perfectly legible without it and I would not have made the reply that I did.

Don't be ridiculous, If I thought all the people hate Helen, then how would I be here arguing with you about her? I don't believe for a second that you thought that's what I meant but nice try anyhow :hehe:

Oh for god's sake, this is beyond a joke now.

:laugh:

All I had to go on was what you wrote. What you wrote suggested that you represent 'all people'.

You've clarified that you meant otherwise. That's fine

THE END

defending the females in the house again jack, even ones as abusive and bullying as jack. if any man behaved like her to a woman, hed have been turfed out by now.

No need to shout at me Hel...........verbal :hehe: