Psylocke |
21-10-2006 05:11 PM |
Quote:
Originally posted by LaurenFah
Quote:
Originally posted by tropical_sunset
Quote:
Originally posted by REVOLUTION
Porn is a naturall thing these days its in every shop TOP SHELF:bigsmile: i think this new thing about putting magazines like:
NUTS
ZOO
FHM
Maxim
Loaded
etc
on the top shelf is stupid i mean its not like the woman are showing ' cough' downstairs areas like the XXX magazines do on the top shelfs
|
true, but they are high up to protect young kids seeing these images. although not graphic like porn is, they are a little saucy for children!
|
But surely mens health magazines should go top shelf too? They show a mans chest, like Zoo etc shows a females.
And what about female health magazines. There's always adverts for breast enlargements, we'd have to top shelf both of these examples.
Outlawing something makes people want it more, saying to someone "you can't look at porn" will make them ask their mates etc, and they'll be exposed to more of it.
We can't be too over-protective.
|
So very True,There are things in magazines like Now,womans way,Vogue etc that are just as,if not more in some cases,not suitable for kids.
but another direction is
It seems in society today it is acceptable for a kid to hear about how a husband Raped killed and then raped the dead body of his wife and then ate the remains,or here how some maniac cut the foetus from a womans stomach and ate it (Taken from Take a Break or one of those mags)............
im not saying kids should be exposed to sexual images,of course not that is] disgusting,but when you put things like page 3 girls on the top shelf and leave "dead body raped and eaten" on the bottom shelves,there is somthing wrong.
|