i ****ing died

Jeremy was obviously out of line but I felt sorry for him in the DR, he obviously has personal issues which he is trying to work out. Too much fuss altogether really imo as it has divided public opinion and may not do either of them any good, time will tell. Possibly he should have been left to his own fate in the loo or alternatively where were the men? Possibly to busy chatting about him behind his back?

People's horror at somebody wearing a bathrobe at night... :umm2:

Anyway, it's bound to only be a couple of hours until a certain someone gets banned - no point trying to argue with someone who's only here to blatantly insult other people, which is pretty much one of the very first rules of the forum.

Horror? Wrongword.com... Read this thread before you make a post directed at me or I will be as rude to you as you have been to me.

I'm gorgeous

To blame Chloe for it is really not fair to be honest, Big Brother was right to remove him because are we forgetting he has issues with Alcohol? Big Brother wants the housemates to be safe. Chloe was being a really nice person being there for him when he was being sick in the toilet. She did not invite him to do what he did. She did look angry and then she cried, maybe she was scared. But Chloe was not to blame for this.

..it really doesn't matter what clothes she had on underneath the robe..even if it was nakedness she had the robe on to cover that nakedness and no one has the right to uncover her...and would we have even known that she was naked under her robe unless this happened..?..no because she was perfectly well covered up...

silly chloe'not good for any man'
 

not so much that she should of had more clothes on underneath, but that she should of thought far more carefully than to put her breasts in the face of a clearly intoxicated man, weather intentional or not, she should of had more nouse and has ruined this guys life by her silly immature reaction. dont put your boobs in someones face and complain when he wants to have a peek! stupid stupid girl.

also. if she felt THAT violated why did she continue to wander round in said dressing gown? still naked underneath,wouldnt you have gone and found clothes to cover up in if you had felt so vulnerable? just a thought.

You lost me at "should of"

Don't go OTT on what actually happened to her.. if she was RAPED.. NOONE here would accept that..PERIOD.. It was ABSOLUTELY NOWHERE near rape infact plz dont use that word when discussing this event.

[QUOTE=Jose Mourinho;7472301]Yeah hes back.

Hey grammar man, work on your experiences in life and then make some meaningful posts, rather than simply posting absolute crap.

<3 <3 <3 Our Savior has returned <3 <3 <3

Ready to debate now? Or you gonna go crying to the mods again?

I well and truly await your cowardly response.

alol I never cry to the mods :joker: I fight with then more often than not

Doubt that.

The Special One vs Queen Macie is my favourite feud on the forum rn.

Grammar man lost his tongue..More reporting inc? LOL!

He don't really debate infact right now he is not replying (There is that long silence from him a yesterday) because he is busy reporting me.

If I get banned for expressing my views as politely as I can.. Until goaded into acting off character.. then there is something seriously wrong with the place.. I am going to sleep I await any replies.

..you say that you're being goaded but you also say that you're awaiting replies, so isn't that in itself goading also...if someone isn't replying then why not leave it at that...

Hahaha people acting OTT because Chloe was wearing a bathrobe

...wearing a bathrobe is not provocative at all and even though it's irrelevant, there may have been reasons why she was naked underneath/she may just have got out of the shower etc and Jeremy being sick became a priority over putting anything else on because she was trying to help him...