ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB15 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=660)
-   -   Why was Chloe naked under her robe out of interest? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=270002)

Daniel. 12-01-2015 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7474967)
Yes ,she was

It still makes absoloutley no difference

Kazanne 12-01-2015 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 7474963)
It's a bit different tbh. Like when Chloe mentioned her page 3 modelling.

Those images are her choice to put in the public arena. Nothing to do with someone helping themselves to opening your clothes.

Spoiler:

Don't spoil it Marsh:joker::joker::joker:

Marsh. 12-01-2015 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7474967)
Yes ,she was

There was no camera in the toilet hun.

The small bit we did see through the door she was sat down and not leaning anywhere near him.


Liam- 12-01-2015 07:26 PM

Morsh scalping with imagery :flutter:

bots 12-01-2015 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazerunner_888 (Post 7474768)
We can surmise about maybes all we want but the fact is she was going around the house helping drunken Americans in a bath robe naked underneath. Now of course she can do that if she likes but that does not seem to me like she was in any rush to get some underwear on which is also fine and her purgative but i find it strange behavior on national TV.

But equally there are not many tv programs that are 24/7 in a house where she could easily have been preparing for a shower/bed. Lets not forget that the puking was an unexpected event at a snapshot in time. Its not like Chloe thought ... Jeremy is in the loo puking, I will just get naked under my bathrobe and give him an opportunity to see my bits :joker:

Marsh. 12-01-2015 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 7474970)
Spoiler:

Don't spoil it Marsh:joker::joker::joker:

:fist:

chuff me dizzy 12-01-2015 07:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 7474973)
There was no camera in the toilet hun.

The small bit we did see through the door she was sat down and not leaning anywhere near him.


On your tv ,but as we've proved ,it not working as good as it should be

Liam- 12-01-2015 07:28 PM

lmfao and then we know that Marsh wins the argument <3

kirklancaster 12-01-2015 07:29 PM

QUOTE=Kazanne;7474950]:joker::joker: Not this angelic bunch Anaesthesia,just like they don't post half naked pics of women and salivate over the female form,:joker::joker: Of couse they would :wavey:[/QUOTE]

Kazanne!!!!:laugh2:

Marsh. 12-01-2015 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7474983)
On your tv ,but as we've proved ,it not working as good as it should be

Oh right, so Chloe was sat down as seen in that image (you did look at it didn't you my love?) on my TV but leaning over him on yours? Ok hun. :joker:

Maybe a change in your prescription is required. :thumbs:

chuff me dizzy 12-01-2015 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiamPRW (Post 7474987)
lmfao and then we know that Marsh wins the argument <3

He wishes :joker::joker::joker:

Marsh. 12-01-2015 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7475002)
He wishes :joker::joker::joker:

When it comes to "proved" I am the only one to have provided actual evidence to my points.

Come and join the adults and be rational for once.

Liam- 12-01-2015 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7475002)
He wishes :joker::joker::joker:

You had to resort to questioning the working state of his tv as an apparently 'rational' argument.. it's fair to say, in a debate where proof is needed, you lost :hehe:

daniel-lewis-1985 12-01-2015 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mazerunner_888 (Post 7474768)
We can surmise about maybes all we want but the fact is she was going around the house helping drunken Americans in a bath robe naked underneath. Now of course she can do that if she likes but that does not seem to me like she was in any rush to get some underwear on which is also fine and her purgative but i find it strange behavior on national TV.

She was helping drunken Americans? Lets not exaggerate it was 1 and yes she was HELPING HIM.

Lets just say it how it is.

The people who are saying she should have been wearing something under the robe are saying that its her own fault and she deserves anything she gets for teasing a man with her sexy dressing gown.

Am I wrong?

Marsh. 12-01-2015 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 (Post 7475019)
She was helping drunken Americans? Lets not exaggerate it was 1 abd yes she was HELPING HIM.

Lets just say it how it is.

The people who are saying she should have been wearing something under the robe are saying in the nicest way possible that its her own fault and she deserves anything she gets for teasing a man with her sexy dressing gown.

Am I wrong?

D: That old woman I saw on the ward in hospital had nothing on under the hospital gown.

The little tease. :creep:

Liam- 12-01-2015 07:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 (Post 7475019)
She was helping drunken Americans? Lets not exaggerate it was 1 abd yes she was HELPING HIM.

Lets just say it how it is.

The people who are saying she should have been wearing something under the robe are saying in the nicest way possible that its her own fault and she deserves anything she gets for teasing a man with her sexy dressing gown.

Am I wrong?

No you are not wrong, you are very much correct unfortunately

daniel-lewis-1985 12-01-2015 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 7475021)
D: That old woman I saw on the ward in hospital had nothing on under the hospital gown.

The little tease. :creep:

Not even those sexy little paper knickers? :o

The filthy mare!

Pincho Paxton 12-01-2015 07:37 PM

They should put Frank Bruno in with his sexy boxer dressing gown he's the complete package!!!

Marsh. 12-01-2015 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985 (Post 7475031)
Not even those sexy little paper knickers? :o

The filthy mare!

She'd pissed herself so had to take it off.

But we know that was all part of her plan.

chuff me dizzy 12-01-2015 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 7475004)
When it comes to "proved" I am the only one to have provided actual evidence to my points.

Come and join the adults and be rational for once.

Adults ? I look in the lounge love, I think your highly mistaken

daniel-lewis-1985 12-01-2015 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 7475036)
She'd pissed herself so had to take it off.

But we know that was all part of her plan.

Pfft how transparent.

Marsh. 12-01-2015 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7475061)
Adults ? I look in the lounge love, I think your highly mistaken

You're looking in the lounge? Try the kitchen maybe you left your marbles there? :)

chuff me dizzy 12-01-2015 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 7475082)
You're looking in the lounge? Try the kitchen maybe you left your marbles there? :)

Is this is personal attack by any chance ?

Niamh. 12-01-2015 07:48 PM

Yes alright you two, lets not start insulting eachother

Marsh. 12-01-2015 07:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7475093)
Is this is personal attack by any chance ?

Only as personal as the ones sent my way. :)


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.