ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB15 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=660)
-   -   Katie Hopkins I don't see it (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=272416)

jaxie 30-01-2015 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poppsywoppsy (Post 7549626)
Can I say I belong to no extremist groups, am totally a family orientated person and support Katie Hopkins.

Whatever those who don't like her care to sling her way and her supporters way, she was the only one who actually stood up to the cretin called Perez.

She was not interested in feeding the troll, she stands up to someone who was the dregs of humanity.

I may not agree with all she says but I agree with a lot.

Those who celebrate behaviour of the gutter are way lower than anything KH did in the house.

So, if others can't see it, well lots can, have complained to the authorities and will not jump on the Perez bandwagon.

You seem to imply its Hopkins of Perez. I don't want either, thanks all the same. There are other angles and options. Once again none of her supporters except seem able to give a reason why they support. You agree with a lot she says. What then?what is OK,and what isn't?

Vicky. 30-01-2015 11:27 PM

I'm a fan of both katie h and perez...cant stand hopkins and most of her views but I find her interesting to watch. Perez would annoy the hell out of me IRL but its fun seeing him piss others off.

In short, I don't 'like' either but I class myself as a fan because of what they bring to the show :laugh:

Kazanne 30-01-2015 11:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ebandit (Post 7549114)
the worrying this is if one believes what was stated....................i'm a dole

walla proudly socialist and i rather like the fact that katie h speaks her

mind

Mark L

:clap1::clap1:

Lampfan 30-01-2015 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozzyshaggah (Post 7550160)
she is payed to be a media shock jock
nothing more nothing less
she has carried that persona into the bb house

i just think parez has played the same game but whole lot better

Exactly. He is doing what he is known for.

She is giving child like expressions and stupid prancing. Pretending that compliments hurt with that weird nod of the head. Kav, Cami, Michelle, Calum are all towing her line. She plants the seed, then the lap dogs follow. Bit sad really.

Mystic Mock 30-01-2015 11:40 PM

1. She attacks Perez.

2. She's so Right Wing and un-PC apparently.

3. She's ugly so the housewives can like relate to her more.

4. Sheep that want to go with who they think is the most popular with the public.

I'm not saying all, but definitely some are following one of those above.

sungrass 30-01-2015 11:43 PM

she is as far right as they come - when she was insulting Nadia it was for being on the left, all her tweets insult people on benefits, or chavs as she calls anyone who has not been fortunate enough to have had an education like hers. She has called for people to be killed in Palestine, she relentlessly bullies anyone simply for attention, any attention is good attention. She is a narcissist. If she wins she will laugh at everyone who voted for her. Her and Parez are the same - but she is darker, more sinister, more evil. I pity people who have fallen for her game. And NO she is not entertaining she is loud and irritating.

she says she wouldnt let her kids play with children called certain names - because it would bring her children down etc - she is a horrible horrible empty person.

Jack The Cat 30-01-2015 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaxie (Post 7550790)
You seem to imply its Hopkins of Perez. I don't want either, thanks all the same. There are other angles and options. Once again none of her supporters except seem able to give a reason why they support. You agree with a lot she says. What then?what is OK,and what isn't?

For me personally, everything is OK unless it is lawfully deamed illegal.

However I never met, or heard of any person in the world who I could say I agree with everything they have ever said. It would be disingenuous for me to state otherwise.

bots 30-01-2015 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat (Post 7550871)
For me personally, everything is OK unless it is lawfully deamed illegal.

However I never met, or heard of any person in the world who I could say I agree with everything they have ever said. It would be disingenuous for me to state otherwise.

The have a set of contractual rules that they need to adhere too. Obviously, if they break a law that takes precedence, but if they violate any of their contractual rules they will be warned/thrown out for it

Jack The Cat 30-01-2015 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sungrass (Post 7550859)
she is as far right as they come - when she was insulting Nadia it was for being on the left, all her tweets insult people on benefits, or chavs as she calls anyone who has not been fortunate enough to have had an education like hers. She has called for people to be killed in Palestine, she relentlessly bullies anyone simply for attention, any attention is good attention. She is a narcissist. If she wins she will laugh at everyone who voted for her. Her and Parez are the same - but she is darker, more sinister, more evil. I pity people who have fallen for her game. And NO she is not entertaining she is loud and irritating.

she says she wouldnt let her kids play with children called certain names - because it would bring her children down etc - she is a horrible horrible empty person.

I cannot agree that she "Is as far right as they come" to do so would be trivialising the real far right, for example fascists.

You may not like the Daily Mail or KH or even hate it but by any political definition they are not fascist. I should say, I do have some knowledge of the subject as WW2 is my specialist subject within my degree field.

Jack The Cat 30-01-2015 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 7550873)
The have a set of contractual rules that they need to adhere too. Obviously, if they break a law that takes precedence, but if they violate any of their contractual rules they will be warned/thrown out for it

You are of course right, without access to this information I could not say what the details of the contracts are or how they are enforced, so it is difficult to comment. Thus I only speak in general terms.

abhorson 30-01-2015 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jaxie (Post 7549069)
So who she is doesn't matter to you, its because she is the anti Perez?

I don't understand why people like her, so I'm asking.


I have answered this countless times.

Denver 30-01-2015 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 7550846)
1. She attacks Perez.

2. She's so Right Wing and un-PC apparently.

3. She's ugly so the housewives can like relate to her more.

4. Sheep that want to go with who they think is the most popular with the public.

I'm not saying all, but definitely some are following one of those above.

Yet again you find away to attack other members.

why not accept we like her for no reason

abhorson 31-01-2015 12:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deebo (Post 7549081)
Find them yourself! I'm not spreading that kind of filth on here, I'll get banned

Can't you see why a violent pro Zionist organisation like the EDL would be chuffed to have someone in BB who calls for the murder of Palestinian children? You can't be that naive and blind and deluded.

This kind of stuff is worse than KH. Way more divisive because it is said with sincerity and hatred.

Mystic Mock 31-01-2015 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7550898)
Yet again you find away to attack other members.

why not accept we like her for no reason

The only person being rude to members on this thread is you, as you again are twisting my post into something sinister.

abhorson 31-01-2015 12:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deebo (Post 7549105)
I can't log on to a forum and read a thread about Big Brother and see usernames such as EDL_Whites saying they're voting for her?

Is it snowing over there in la-la land too?

A perfect example above.

Jules2 31-01-2015 12:07 AM

It has all been said before so it seems silly to go over and over it. Katie H has her supporters, one of which is myself. I like her for her honesty and the fact that she will take criticism back because she knows and appreciates that everyone has their own opinions.

I havent studied her outside of the house as this is always a silly thing to do in my eyes. I like the game and therefore I treat it as a game and in the house I love Katie Hopkins. I think a lot of things said are biased because of her outside dealings.

Nadia couldnt get over her hatred for her even though she shook hands with her and said that she had seen her lovelier side. KP said the same thing but then as soon as Perez came back he stirred the pot and they all listened. He hates KH and sees her as a threat, therefore the most damage was seemingly done to KH. She is ok and perhaps she will show her softer side when she leaves, who knows eh but in the meantime I for one will go on to the next show....so for now....

Katie Hopkins, Calum and Kav for the last three.

abhorson 31-01-2015 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deebo (Post 7549214)
I wish she'd tell the truth about bankers, illegal wars, torture, the use of white phosphorous etc. etc.

Why is it that the only "truth" the Murdoch media will allow us to hear is about how bad poor people, benefits claimants, muslims and single mothers are?

This is BB. Not the GE!

abhorson 31-01-2015 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ozzyshaggah (Post 7550160)
she is payed to be a media shock jock
nothing more nothing less
she has carried that persona into the bb house

i just think parez has played the same game but whole lot better

Perez has clearly not. He is **** on her shoe.

Jack The Cat 31-01-2015 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abhorson (Post 7550919)
This is BB. Not the GE!

I agree, the "Truth" is a very ambiguous word, always depends on the individuals point of view.

abhorson 31-01-2015 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack The Cat (Post 7550930)
I agree, the "Truth" is a very ambiguous word, always depends on the individuals point of view.

So agree. But a few numpties on here because of KH's political leanings think they can class every supporter of hers as BNP, EDL, CON, UKIP etc. Frigging idiots for doing so. I am a voter of none of these, but i respect the right of anybody to do so, whatever my personal thoughts. I am an activist for the SNP and as most know by now, in Scotland, the Labour party is seen as vermin. But also respect the Labour voters choice up here to vote for them.

I still like KH. That is my choice.

Lampfan 31-01-2015 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jules2 (Post 7550918)
It has all been said before so it seems silly to go over and over it. Katie H has her supporters, one of which is myself. I like her for her honesty and the fact that she will take criticism back because she knows and appreciates that everyone has their own opinions.

I havent studied her outside of the house as this is always a silly thing to do in my eyes. I like the game and therefore I treat it as a game and in the house I love Katie Hopkins. I think a lot of things said are biased because of her outside dealings.

Nadia couldnt get over her hatred for her even though she shook hands with her and said that she had seen her lovelier side. KP said the same thing but then as soon as Perez came back he stirred the pot and they all listened. He hates KH and sees her as a threat, therefore the most damage was seemingly done to KH. She is ok and perhaps she will show her softer side when she leaves, who knows eh but in the meantime I for one will go on to the next show....so for now....

Katie Hopkins, Calum and Kav for the last three.

KH has nothing to her. She failed in the Apprentice. She failed in the jungle.

She thought... How can one stay relevant?

Oh i know... lets tweet "controversial" things and say controversial things on TV. Anybody can be a troll. It's not hard. She gets press. She's going to win this show. Being a vicious troll will encourage the trolls even more.

At least the unfamous trolls are a bit funny, unlike Hopkins.

"She's dumb" lol. She's trying to make friends" lol "Small dick" lol and the best one "my public"

Mystic Mock 31-01-2015 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abhorson (Post 7550983)
So agree. But a few numpties on here because of KH's political leanings think they can class every supporter of hers as BNP, EDL, CON, UKIP etc. Frigging idiots for doing so. I am a voter of none of these, but i respect the right of anybody to do so. Whatever my personal thoughts. I am an activist for the SNP and as most know by now. In Scotland, the Labour party is seen as vermin. But that is Labour voters choice up here to vote for them.

I still like KH. That is my choice.

It's not idiotic to think that most of Hopkins fans are right wing, not all of them but most of them just to clarify before my words get twisted again.

Lampfan 31-01-2015 12:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 7551007)
It's not idiotic to think that most of Hopkins fans are right wing, not all of them but most of them just to clarify before my words get twisted again.

Politics shouldn't come into BB, ffs.

At least, I hope not.

Jack The Cat 31-01-2015 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock (Post 7551007)
It's not idiotic to think that most of Hopkins fans are right wing, not all of them but most of them just to clarify before my words get twisted again.

I don't think it is idiotic but it is a leap of faith without any evidence to show that most of them are. She is not as far as I know making any actual political statements, just very general one. Which it could be argued are apolitical.

SaveUs 31-01-2015 12:42 AM

Well for one her tweet on Palestine was irresponsible and hateful (see signature). For the record I don't think Palestinians should be stabbing Israelites but my point is don't talk about restarting bombing campaigns especially from such a platform.

She also criticised religion which is fine, it's an ideology but doing so through a group of people (Muslims in this case) is sloppy and unnecessary. Then there's the joking about the Ebola patient from Glasgow. That's not honest and if you have the right to free speech you should also take responsibility for it.

If she hadn't of said those things I probably wouldn't be so against her being a professional troll.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.