I asked a question... I didn't make any demands.

Yes he has dug a Far Deeper Hole

Excuse me? we have the text as a reference and I based my opinion on that the same as everyone else :/

The pervert ought to disappear down it.

'A partner in one of the UK’s largest criminal law firms suggested Miss Proudman would be ‘blacklisted’ by solicitors.
Franklin Sinclair, of Tuckers Solicitors, wrote on Twitter: ‘What an awful thing to do, what kind of world do we live in when a man can’t give a lady a compliment.getalife. Nomorebriefs4u. (sic)’
When she responded saying she would not want to work for ‘sexist solicitors’, he replied: ‘I should think you’ve blacklisted yourself from more than just sexist ones!’

Grim and backwards thinking old boys club, Well done Miss Proudman I hope this sees a change in these dinosaurs :/


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3lLx8G2kv

she ageist and hes not sexist , typical feminist drivel and reverse sexism where women can say what they like and men cant.

Reverse sexism is like reverse racism, it doesn't exist. Those kinds of terms are always made up by the majority so they can demonise the ACTUAL minorities and pretend to be oppressed when they aren't.

Your intentions were clear enough, dear.

it does exist youre lying. could a man sue a woman for complimenting his appearance? the field is not level its wholly biased against men which is why over 80% of men lose their kids their home and a lifetimes income in divorce cases...its why male suicides are at a record high and 4 times the rate of women, its why 50 times as much is spent on womens charities, its why 3 times as much si spent on womens health and cancer , even though men die 5 years younger in every nation on earth. you will duly ignore this bias against men because you don't care

There we go.

she sure is full of that

:joker: why is he openly checking out his own daughter on facebook?

What an illiterate creep. Perhaps he was typing with one hand.

I would'nt even call it 'reverse' sexism,Just plain old sexism tbh.

:laugh:

He said her picture was stunning he was paying her a compliment,nothing sexually suggestive or offensive in that.

She completely overreacted and punished this guy publicly...why ??

She is the one with the problem , man hating bitch so far up her own arse...

27-year-old human rights lawyer

The told me everything I need to know.

Bad Times with men

Don't patronise me because you misunderstood my post.

Because quite possibly as it is a professional site she wasn't to happy that he overlooked all her academic and work achievements and focused on her looks? as an introductory email on that particular site it was insulting, maybe he got the site confused with match.com :shrug:

I agree with that, not because I think it's a problem that he complimented her picture, but because that's ALL he did. If he had messaged her in the spirit of what the site is supposed to be about, to make that sort of contact, written a big message focusing on her professional expertise and with a good reason that they should be contacts, and then he had added at the bottom "Oh, by the way, great profile picture!"... Then I don't see why it should be a problem.

However, the fact that he quite clearly had no interest in messaging her other than to creep, is what makes it a problem. It's not Tinder.

Disagree.....Linkedin is still a social media website and as such there is room for a certain amount of informality. what he said was complimentary NOT sexist . she has taken a friendly remark and decided to attack this man publicly, label him a sexist a pervert etc..

This is an outrageous attack on this man's character over a friendly innocuous remark.

NOT many Solicitors will want to deal with this slightly deranged feminist after her strange reaction to this man's remark.

• LinkedIn lawyers: Did this man's weak sexism really warrant perv-shaming?

Earlier this year she used the left-wing website Left Foot Forward to explain that she was a campaigner for feminism, not equality, because: “Men live and work in a brutal society, which is maintained through stratified social order based on ritual humiliation, gentleman’s clubs, fights, rites of passage, sexism, and banter.
“When women enter the male realm whether law, politics, or a construction site, they find themselves in a repugnant world in which their only means of survival is by undergoing a fundamental transformation leaving them with little opportunity to make any change.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ant-world.html

What do you know perv shaming is actually a thing :laugh: The torygraph article backs up Charlottes view brilliantly.

Here is an article where fat shaming is discussed, something that is frowned upon even though nobody is ever specifically targeted, if that's so acceptable then why is 'perv shaming' so unacceptable?
Is it really that different... women singled out for their looks as opposed to what's between their ears.
Could it be that the usual victims of fat shaming are women and the the 'victims' of perv shaming men? (I appreciate it sometimes works the other way around)
Fat shamers can shout from the rooftops as it's now socially acceptable to be #bodyconfident, why can't perv shamers be afforded the same courtesy to be #brainconfident and reject the accepted social norm of being objectified if you don't have a face like a bag of spanners.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wom...rent-this.html

Apparently it wasn't even based on her looks at all...

'He’s now delivered a statement on the subject, saying he meant the quality of her photo was ‘stunning’ rather than Proudman herself.
“My comment was aimed at the professional quality of the presentation on LinkedIn which was unfortunately misinterpreted,” he said.'

And if you believe that.. :joker:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wom...rent-this.html

yeah right :laugh: If that was true why did he say that he was being Politically incorrect? Idiot lol