ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB17 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=696)
-   -   Andrew The real reason why Andrew was ejected (Video) (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=302585)

jet 15-06-2016 02:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 8723687)
Because The Sun shouldn't be publishing this video in the first place? Why should he - a participant in a ****ing reality television show - have to comment on a personal video that nobody but those he shared it with should be witness to? He isn't obligated to and nor should he be, what should be the case is that a national newspaper shouldn't be allowed to publish videos like this and seemingly edit them (in the words of both people depicted in it) to not only drag someone's name through the mud, but have them removed from a programme they're taking part in.

It is beyond belief that anyone can justify that
I'm not justifying it, though I'm glad he got some comeuppance to shrink his big head. I asked why he lied when he knew it was going to be published anyway, and why he didn't say that the tape about to be published by the Sun was edited. That would be the sensible thing to do. Instead he came out with some (as usual) arrogant big - lad crap about a master plan so remarkable BB couldn't stomach it. He wasn't even smart enough to realize how that appeared - that BB must have thought he was crazy enough to want to get him out of there. :joker:

empire 15-06-2016 02:23 AM
the truth is that the show bosses, this year, where scraping the barrel, with the people they brought in this year, and its back fired, they must of known, the reputation of not just andrew, but the rest of the housemates,

Ithinkiloveyoutoo 15-06-2016 02:49 AM
Spank me daddy

Mokka 15-06-2016 02:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ithinkiloveyoutoo (Post 8723716)
Spank me daddy
:joker::joker::joker::joker:

my favourite response in this thread

camertone 15-06-2016 04:01 AM
50 shades of grey..

JayBlaze 15-06-2016 04:30 AM
I think Andrew would have beat the **** out of someone in the house especially the way Marco, Chelsea and Jackson carry on like they can fight haha

wendywillow 15-06-2016 04:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 8723687)
Because The Sun shouldn't be publishing this video in the first place? Why should he - a participant in a ****ing reality television show - have to comment on a personal video that nobody but those he shared it with should be witness to? He isn't obligated to and nor should he be, what should be the case is that a national newspaper shouldn't be allowed to publish videos like this and seemingly edit them (in the words of both people depicted in it) to not only drag someone's name through the mud, but have them removed from a programme they're taking part in.

It is beyond belief that anyone can justify that
:clap1::clap1::clap1:

wendywillow 15-06-2016 04:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayBlaze (Post 8723750)
I think Andrew would have beat the **** out of someone in the house especially the way Marco, Chelsea and Jackson carry on like they can fight haha

tht would've been interesting

_Tom_ 15-06-2016 05:28 AM
At least 8 of the producers are snakes.

MarcusMel 15-06-2016 05:35 AM
You can read Andrews tweets @cobratate

VanessaFeltz. 15-06-2016 05:48 AM
well they had to make that desicion with the information they had.

I think after all those things we saw it was dangerous for Andrew to be in the house

Clootie Dumpling 15-06-2016 05:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Tom_ (Post 8723764)
At least 8 of the producers are snakes.
:laugh::laugh::laugh:

AnnieK 15-06-2016 07:24 AM
The girls face in the video is blurred so we don't actually know that the girl who has come forward is the actual girl in the video.

Anyway, I agree with Jacka comments about the Sun, this is quite tame compared to some of the **** they've printed over the years....there is more to this than we've been told by BB I'm sure

Ammi 15-06-2016 07:34 AM
...as well as not being able to be sure if it is the lady who has said that it was consensual, we also don't know if that 'consensual' being said now, is a control that he still has over someone...

waterhog 15-06-2016 07:47 AM
it explains why he has gone. omg.

Crimson Dynamo 15-06-2016 08:03 AM
well there goes my BB career

wtf

2 people having consensual fun is nowt to do with BB

:facepalm:

that is ridiculous, what Marco did ON SCREEN is far far worse and dangerous

utterly ridiculous

Crimson Dynamo 15-06-2016 08:04 AM
also she should have been tied to the bed


just a little housekeeping there for Andrew

Clootie Dumpling 15-06-2016 08:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 8723841)
also she should have been tied to the bed


just a little housekeeping there for Andrew
Damn! You're right - I knew something didn't look right! :hee:

sampvt 15-06-2016 08:16 AM
This is what happens when you fill the house full of Z listers. They are all so fame hungry and weird that their back stories will be full of stupid attention seeking acts of depravity. Natilies agent must be sitting on eggs this morning worrying that one of her clients might leak a video or the 2 pole dancing and botox laden bints in the poor house must be crapping themselves.

None of these people are normal so expect a back story that suits. How can they label this civilian BB, simply nuts.

Denver 15-06-2016 08:23 AM
I cant at the levels people will go to protect their faves this video was not edited as otherwise he would have released the full version by now he is a liar and had it been lets say Marco the same people woukd be waiting oitside the house ready to lynch mob him, Andrew has proved he is scum and i dont know why people protect him and he does come across as someone who would be overprotective and voilent to a girl.

Crimson Dynamo 15-06-2016 08:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 8723853)
I cant at the levels people will go to protect their faves this video was not edited as otherwise he would have released the full version by now he is a liar and had it been lets say Marco the same people woukd be waiting oitside the house ready to lynch mob him, Andrew has proved he is scum and i dont know why people protect him and he does come across as someone who would be overprotective and voilent to a girl.
thats not violence its having fun

hot2go 15-06-2016 08:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 8723613)
If there is a video of them laughing as Andrew claims he should prove it
Wouldn't matter if there isn't ... What's laughing got to do with it ? ....they're making a fetish video not a clip for Youve Been Framed....BB shud research their housemates better but He's not in the wrong for making it

Clootie Dumpling 15-06-2016 08:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hot2go (Post 8723870)
Wouldn't matter if there isn't ... What's laughing got to do with it ? ....they're making a fetish video not a clip for Youve Been Framed....BB shud research their housemates better but He's not in the wrong for making it
LOL. Actually, there is a short burst of female laughter at the very beginning of the video, which seems to be coming from the 'victim'

sampvt 15-06-2016 08:43 AM
That video seems to be a clumsy attempt by 2 idiots to fulfil some fetish by consensual means and shouldn't be the basis to eject someone from the house, Im simply not buying it.

Crimson Dynamo 15-06-2016 08:45 AM
Its the same as ejecting a housemate for having anal sex between 2 men

Just because its not everyones cup of tea does not mean oh well lets eject him


He surely has a legal case here if that video is all the evidence?


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 PM.
Page 4 of 5 « First 23 4 5
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.