delta |
25-07-2016 04:33 AM |
I still think there is more to these 2 than meets the eye.
They potentially could be playing all of us. Just imagine this scenario....
She was approached and is an aficionado of everything BB- she knows it inside out and has watched every series. As is their 'won't' BB never one to pass up an opportunity find out that Charlie's boyfriend is non other than a Z rated actor and bit part double stunt man.
2 for the price for one - hey ho!
Right, they both know they are going in, how are they going to play it?
1) Create an artificial grievance - Charlie trying to win him back
2) Jason in total denial of any knowledge that she is in the house.
3) Charlie bulls Jason up saying he's got a huge appendage ( I tell you ladies it can be a curse) Either she's totally thick or it's one big ruse, why would you advertise to other women, when you are trying to win someone back, a potential positive that would take your intended away from you?
4) Now this is where it gets a bit murky as they are then playing with randomness and quantum maths and the unexpected. It was clear one of them had to go, was Charlie the prearranged fall guy- the one that would sacrifice herself to allow Jason to further his ambition?
5) She's been able to keep his name in the papers and keep him reasonably high profile whilst he .....
6) Puts on moody strops and threatens to leave the show in the only way he knows how to gain air time.
7) Just as his stock is falling she makes another big scene to get him a sympathy vote which could propel him to the final 4
Only my musings ..... what ever it is, they are not as innocent as the proclaim and have been working in tandem for a long while imho
|