Omg :joker:

Exactly Smudgie :hehe:

Why not believe it or not some women do embody of of those negative qualities :shrug:

How did he flip flop he told her they were not a couple,but they could be friends ,how is that flip flopping he told her ,she would not listen.

How is that funny?

He didn't flip flop his haters will come up with any excuse to deride him :nono:

I totally agree with this, he was very much a buffer that tried to keep the lid on the boiling pot that was Charlie to save not only himself from the vitriol, admittedly, but also the other housemates, particularly the other women in there. They and some of the viewers seem to have forgotten this. It certainly can't have been easy and was probably mentally exhausting for him. He's had a pretty **** time in that house altogether 😕

No ,she said SHE treated HIM badly how hard is that to understand. She has a mouth like a sewer so I imagine **** is what she is used to

Because it's LT saying it

It's hilarious :laugh::laugh:

Let's face it - if he'd told her outright he didn't want her he would have been accused of humiliating her on national TV.

BTW you know how Charlie said in her eviction interview that he was saying things to string her along and get her hopes up...did Big Brother ever actually catch any of that? Surely that would have been worth showing on TV? Would they have just edited all that juicy stuff out?

I supported Charlie because I was sick to death of all the bullies calling her names and wishing her harm. As someone pointed out on another thread the people in the house are real and shouldn't be subjected to verbal abuse, threats to their safety, name calling s*** shaming or questions about their mental health. Just because they can't hear what's being said about them andso can't defend themselves doesn't give anyone the right to indulge abuse...and it's ********** illegal-it's called Defamation of character I believe.

It's totally wrong and completely unfair. If it was happening to someone they knew, they'd be going crazy, but strangers seem fair game.:fist::nono:

As a woman myself I wouldn't place undue blame on another woman. However, just because I am a woman doesn't mean I have to automatically side with the woman instead of the man. From what I saw on TV, Jason didn't do anything wrong to Charlie. I didn't see him make her miserable at all.

He doesn't have to be with her if he doesn't want to, nor does he have to be with her just to make her happy/give her what she wants.

I agree with everything you've written. Just because I like Jason doesn't make I hate Charlie. Far from it. I was disappointed with what she said to him last night, and actually I think your post summarises everything that was wrong with how she treated him last night, and on a couple of other episodes too.

I think the whole situation was set to be a disaster from the very beginning, and I don't think either of them are necessarily in the right or wrong. The experience itself can be difficult, but I imagine it's quite rewarding at the same time. However, I think it makes a difference when you go into the house with someone you have a history with. It's not a unique experience to say the least. It suddenly becomes an ongoing experience you have with that other person. It might be easy if you go through most of it choosing to ignore each other (Chelsea and Jane), or if your issue can be sorted out after one night (Ryan & Sam), but there was a lot of baggage in this 'story' with both Charlie and Jason.

They ruined each other's time in the house, and it was always going to happen. Charlie needed to make her intentions clearer to herself and realise what her true feelings towards Jason were/are, and Jason, well (if what I've heard is true) he need(ed)/s to stop seeing her as an objective woman he wanted to pursue sexual acts withif he was no longer interested. I quite liked both of them at the time they were in the house together, but I did prefer Charlie in the fact that I found her more entertaining. Her behaviour last night was a little uncomfortable to watch, but I don't think Jason should be made out to a complete hero either.

I wish they hadn't brought it into the show, it's their business what happened in the relationship previously and what we did see in the house was tedious beyond belief.

Cleo was the only good bit.

Indeed.

Well Charlie knows him better than anyone on here does and if she's he's game playing or not being himself I'll choose to believe her. Plus the fact it's been plain as day to see.

I'd rather support someone is a bit messy but true to themselves than a sly character.

Did you overlook all the fat shaming and slut shaming the female housemates have had thrown at them by the same people who take issue with anything negative said about Jason?

:clap1::clap1:

I'd rather not support either. I don't think being 'true to yourself' works as an excuse for bad behaviour.

I don't condemn or surround myself with the people who get involved in that, more fool them for stooping that low after complaining about other people doing the same thing so that conversation isn't something for me to get involved in.. my posts were about Jason and the treatment i've witnessed towards him

Charlie is quite simply a scumbag. Nasty and bitter til the end. Jason will need a restraining order to keep that psycho away.

#TeamCharlie, Jason is pure scum.