Greg ended the haters.

name names who wished she died?

Read the thread yourself maybe

i did but if you accuse, use names, dont hide

mess

kim could make headlines in her sleep, she wouldn't go through all this effort

Hey. Isn't this the board with deathlist thread? A bit hypocrital no?

Besides I didn't say I wish she was dead, I said I thought she was dead. :laugh:

This is getting more and more ridiculous.

Kris was there MOMENTS after the robbery-conveniently ready
The kids are in Paris but were conveniently sleeping elsewhere
The bodyguard was looking after her sister not her
Inside Job
Camera turned
Kim was GI Jane and unbound herself...sigh can we move on and let her deal in peace. Why is this headline news when there's lives being claimed around the world :rolleyes:

Highly intelligent...lol :joker: Didn't Armenians and Armenian politicians tell her to shush?

I can't stand what this woman or her family represent but some of the replies in here are pretty crass to say the least :umm2: she's still a human being

That said, I'd have thought she would've had bodyguards and security with her 24/7? Amazing really

:laugh: I can think of 10 million reasons. :hee:

It seems that most of the people who are claiming this to be fake, also don't seem to hold that high of an opinion of the Kardashians. I bloody hate the Kardashians but I'm not going to hold a bias viewpoint and say that this is what they do and how typical it is of them - something serious has allegedly happened and, as we have no evidence to suggest otherwise, the many attempts at doubting it are purposeless and seem to be fueled only by hatred.

I'm no fan of the kardashian's but I don't see how "Parties too hard at husband Kanye's concert" = "Fakes a gun-point seize"

Like what they do for attention and what's happened to Kim aren't even remotely comparable

Yeah I agree with this, it's not typical at all... oh remember that time Kim K pretended to almost get killed, happens all the time! To me this is just "a rich person gets robbed", nothing really unusual about it at all. Yes there's details like there not being much security there, and her kids 'conveniently' weren't there etc, but they only really hold as arguments if she's never been away from her kids before and this is the first time she hasn't been surrounded by guards at 3am.

As much as she is an attention *****, faking an armed robbery is way too extreme even for her imo, there's literally no precedent that would suggest it's the kind of thing she'd do. And if it was for insurance money or something then surely she'd just stage an ordinary and much simpler robbery that wouldn't involve as much of an in-depth investigation as this surely will.

I will say though that I don't think there's anything 'wrong' (morally) with people suggesting she's faked it... it's just a conspiracy theory and they happen all the time. It's no different to someone suggesting the McCann parents are guilty for example.
Also she's a celebrity and people are entitled to judge and comment on her without considering her personally or emotionally. I mean her being judged on a shallow level is exactly how she's managed to amass £10 million worth of jewelry in the first place.

All time low for the attention seeker.

Throughout history - from 'Woolworth's' heiress Barbara Hutton, through legend Doris Day, to a lot of the bands and pop stars of the 70's onwards - rich 'celebrities' have been ripped off by trusted people within their inner sanctums. Some of these victims were highly intelligent and very savvy but they were robbed and cheated anyway.

I'm not suggesting that Kim Kardashian was 'in' on any robbery - if, indeed, one did really occur - but it is not without historical precedence that one or more of her trusted aides set it all up.

Is it?

I think it's likely that someone working for her was in on it. The robbers will have needed to know specifics about her schedule I reckon, more than just what gets posted on social media etc. It will have only taken one staff member to help them (or organise it).

. " there's literally no precedent that suggests it's the kind of thing she'd do"

Oh yeah?

http://m.eonline.com/shows/kardashia...k-see-the-pics

This is what this family do. They've all been. " robbed" before you'd think they'd learn.

Well actually no, that's not ALL I've got. I've got lots more. For instance, her ex-bodyguard as stated on record that in his opinion it's an inside job. Ands the French press virtually ignored the incident, except for one newspaper.

So... what have YOU got?

What's sadly illuminating? You think you can judge people on how they feel about a waste-of-space celebrity flashing their vulgar wealth? I'm basing my opinion on lots of things, including the truthfulness of the Kardashian's previous claims on the Internet. I think I am justified in taking this with a pinch of salt. I refuse to be all concerned when there are real events happening in the world that deserve more attention.

Yeah, we don't often agree... but this time I'm with you 100%. And the press statement said she "wiggled out of her plasic handcuffs". Bollox. No one "wiggles" out of plasticuffs... If they're worth putting on, you don't leave them loose enough to "wiggle" out of.

Yes, an inside job suggests that a member of her team was in on it, not her. Even if he did mean that she was involved I wouldn't take the word of an Ex employee seriously without proof. Ex Employees tend to be bitter.

The french press isn't exactly big on celebrities like Kim K or 'scandals' (although I wouldn't class this as a scandal) they basically didn't care when their own president had an affair so it doesn't really mean much that they aren't covering a tabloid star that much.

It's just grasping at straws tbh. She got robbed, end of story. There's been nothing to suggest otherwise aside from her haters desperately wanting a reason to hate her.

You seem concerned enough to spend time trying to find 'facts' that support your wild theories so I wouldn't act like you don't care at this point.

"the kind of thing she'd do" being faking an armed robbery, as per my post. This link just shows that someone else in her family was also robbed a couple of years ago :shrug: The suggestion being that the Kim K incident could only be real if noone else in her family has been robbed before her? I don't really understand the logic tbh sorry

:clap1:

The Deathlist isn't about wishing harm on people though so it's not really the same as some of the comments in this thread.

It is still pretty grim though tbf ^ I've always disliked it

i haven't seen anyone wishing her harm on this thread though :shrug: I do think someone who has been robbed should be given the benefit of the doubt personally unless its proven to be a set up, that is weird, but clearly she/the family have a polarising effect on people