No it's vile behaviour

This is disgusting, and people who think it's okay behaviour have to be deluded, I'm sorry but its true

God forbid blokes should be expected to take any responsibility for birth control!

Nope. If you like someone like that it's important to discuss it with them first.

Well that's a different argument altogether tbf, yeah sure if it was a one night stand or whatever but if you're in a relationship with someone and your partner has told you that she's taking the pill, you should be able to trust that

I agree with that but I think she said they had been together for 3 weeks or something, if that is the case he really should have protected himself if he didn't want kids you don't know anyone after 3 weeks

Particularly as the pill is not 100% - shouldn't both do the necessary.

Bracketed sentence at the end....replace with a new WAG with pound signs in her eyes after a month or so...deciding to bring life into the world making her a more permanent WAG or a hefty child maintenance case and that's my standpoint.

No need to apologise, we are mostly decent people here.:smug:

I wonder how much the gutter **** got paid for the pregnancy pics!

Well, the Pill isnt 100% and if she got pregnant because of that 1% then yeah that would be an accident that both are responsible for but that wasnt the case here, she fooled him into thinking she was taking the Pill but she wasnt

I thought it was 3 months but maybe i'm wrong

Sorry, my point was that he should do his bit to protect himself if he didn't want to be a dad at that point. He shouldn't simply rely on the woman. If he does and it goes pear-shaped, for whatever reason, then he is also to blame. Any bloke daft enough to trust a girlfriend of 3 weeks/3months, especially one like Nicola, who clearly wanted to be a WAG and to grab herself a meal ticket deserves what he gets. It always takes two.

But she did it for his birthday

It was a betrayal of trust and awful behaviour. She was forcing fatherhood on him and if the relationship hadn't worked he'd have been responsible emotionally and financially for at least 18 years. He had the right to have a say.

I was.a bit taken a back when I heard her say it, I guess she's on a public TV show so it becomes a topic for the public, it's not for me are all but if she's happy and her husband was happy then I find it hard to judge, it's not something I'd ever encourage or advise though, she got very lucky that he took the news exactly like she expected him to.

Who said they shouldn't?

We're talking about a woman claiming to be on the pill when she isn't?

If he thought she was on the pill and wanted to be using contraception then, no two ways about it, it's not great. Even worse would be if he had specifically said that he did NOT want kids.

IF he had previously wanted her to come off it / wanted children with her but she had previously said no, then her thinking is more understandable, as she would just have been assuming that he still wanted that and would be excited when she got pregnant.

However it would probably have been better to at least check that he was still on the same page before assuming and going ahead with it...

Nothing's 100% so that's neither here nor there.

Didn't he have that say when he chose not to protect himself but to rely on a new girlfriend of a few months to be responsible, when he was a well-known footballer with quite a bit of money - when does a bit of common sense come into play.

So he was "asking for it"?

I suppose he could ensure he ensures he uses something anyway.
However I say you are right in all you say above.

Full hysterectomy...

He should do it whilst she's asleep and say "just kidding Nic" when she wakes up.