I'd love it if James actually was playing a game, and he erupted in the final week with home truths for Kim, Jedward, Speidi etc - it'd be ****ing hilarious

What would actually happen as a result though is the majority of this forum would decide he's 'fake', 'cancelled' and a 'prick' :joker:

Why does "playing the game" have to involve erupting and giving home truths? :shrug:

No because he will most likely have expired

That's what I call a weak and inappropriate response...:nono:

:omgno:


don't you BOTHER!
http://i.imgur.com/Wvxw5p7.gif

It doesn't, as my post in the other thread will show you 'playing the game' can and is just as easy as sitting back, saying and doing nothing, befriending your housemates and sailing through to the final and then winning because you're 'nice'. BBUK is one of the easiest games on television to win as a result

My point is that I very much doubt that's what he's doing, and that he is just a nice guy. Nothing wrong with that of course, and I do like him...but a better housemate than Speidi he is not

:umm2:

Because Speidi keep "almost" doing something more interesting but then don't? :shrug:

I have thought for a while though that I just have this feeling that James is gonna lose it one day (in much the same way Bobby/Cheggars were broken down), he seems very over the whole thing and eventually things will wear thin

Then why isn't he saying that? Why did he say he thought they were a threat?

That's not very genuine.

There's no 'almost' about it, the bottle stealing happened, the Austin baiting happened, the Kim door thing happened

Like I said, I have been disappointed in them this time around but they have still brought more to the show than James has

So what has James done then that's been interesting?

They are a threat because they are obvious game players...

Because that's all they talk about, their threats and who is likely to win and how.
So much they even had Angie asking them explicitly why they say her as a threat. He's probably now playing the game the way he thinks it should be played, taking out those you think are most likely to beat you to the win. Most of the housemates are voting that way, including Speidi, such as when they contributed to send him back to hell where he had a 1 in 3 chance of being evicted.

I don't see how this makes him not genuine. The guy is honestly crucified no matter what he does.

:joker::joker:

I was responding to someone who said Speidi were interesting. The onus is on them to answer the question, not you to flip it and make it about something else.

But in answer to your question, he's pissed half this forum off this evening and it's been highly amusing.

The "Kim door thing"? :umm2:

If that is honestly top 3 of things they've done this series then please let's bring back Sam Evans for the next All Stars. :hehe:

:joker:

It's a forum, I can ask what I want - I'll take your reply as a thinly veiled 'ive got no ****ing clue'.

He has been nice :shrug:....his expressions speak volumes....however depends what you class as interesting?...showmances..nudity...pointless arguing...jumping on beds?

Is that it he's been nice? thrilling.

:joker::joker::joker: You're on form tonight Marsh:wavey:

Much like Speidi's DOOR TAUNTING of Kim! Such captivating tv!!

Or rather, I'm discussing something entirely different with someone else. If you wanted to ask a random question maybe post it on my wall?

I'm not here to argue with the likes of you. I'm only partaking in this thread in the first place because I know Jack is the type of poster to stick to the ****ing topic.