ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Women marches around the World Are SEXIST: London March : Police Have Stopped It (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=315186)

Amy Jade 21-01-2017 06:08 PM

Threads like this seriously made me think Arista must be trolling us all

Niamh. 21-01-2017 06:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 9169110)
https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images..._V2_bigger.jpgDonald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump Jan 20

We will follow two simple rules: BUY AMERICAN & HIRE AMERICAN!
#InaugurationDay #MAGA����
14,320 replies . 34,844 retweets 136,567 likes

:clap1:

when will Theresa?


You want her to buy and hire American?

Crimson Dynamo 21-01-2017 06:52 PM

top comment in the DM article

12,000+ likes (never seen one so high)

It's a pity they weren't as angry about the many attacks on women in Europe by certain males. No protests about that!



:clap1:


Women, hang your heads in shame


:bored:

Withano 21-01-2017 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9169124)
Not without proof it's not - and calling everyone, for example, who voted For Trump a bigot is a good example of trying to shut down opposing opinions

Not without proof? You just called The Truth a bigot about an hour ago, you have no proof of this.. Apply your rules to yourself or carry on with hypocrisy.

Pete. 21-01-2017 07:34 PM

A woman wins the popular vote & a pro-female march is more popular than Trump's inauguration, the USA is not totally destroyed :love:

Brillopad 21-01-2017 07:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 9169360)
Not without proof? You just called The Truth a bigot about an hour ago, you have no proof of this.. Apply your rules to yourself or carry on with hypocrisy.

I most certainly did not call the Truth a bigot - what are you harping on about. You must have read something wrong. What post, where?

You are just dying to jump on my posts and in your desperation got the wrong end of the stick. Come on proof please?

Smithy 21-01-2017 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 9169250)
top comment in the DM article

12,000+ likes (never seen one so high)

It's a pity they weren't as angry about the many attacks on women in Europe by certain males. No protests about that!



:clap1:


Women, hang your heads in shame


:bored:

Or maybe the men should hang their heads in shame for attacking the women? :think:

Withano 21-01-2017 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9169377)
I most certainly did not call the Truth a bigot - what are you harping on about. You must have read something wrong. What post, where?

You are just dying to jump on my posts and in your desperation got the wrong end of the stick. Come on proof please?

Quote:

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 9168836)
killary and the feminazis are the real bigots

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9168853)
People who accuse others of being bigots are bigots. Pot and kettle.

It's all a less intelligent way of shutting down opposing views/arguments.

You certainly did call him a bigot and unintelligent
On a post where he called a group of people bigots due to his own opinion, for whatever reason, you quoted him and said anybody who calls people bigots is a bigot and unintelligent.

Ban worthy in my opinion

Brillopad 21-01-2017 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 9169423)
You certainly did call him a bigot and unintelligent
On a post where he called a group of people bigots due to his own opinion, for whatever reason, you quoted him and said anybody who calls people bigots is a bigot and unintelligent.

Ban worthy in my opinion

I knew it and I know you.

I believe I posted that after a post of the Truths. I did not quote him as it was not directed at him. I thought from what I said it would be pretty obvious to who it was aimed at, although I decided not to directly quote him. You of course saw what you wanted to see.

Too eager to jump the gun without being sure of your facts - could be seen as harassment - ban worthy I think.

Withano 21-01-2017 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9169469)
I knew it and I know you.

I believe I posted that after a post of the Truths. I did not quote him as it was not directed at him. I thought from what I said it would be pretty obvious to who it was aimed at, although I decided not to directly quote him. You of course saw what you wanted to see.

Too eager to jump the gun without being sure of your facts - could be seen as harassment - ban worthy I think.

look throught the thread.. You quoted him on a post he called a group of people bigots, and you said that anybody who calls someone a bigot is a bigot.

There is no need for personal attacks.

Brillopad 21-01-2017 08:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 9169504)
look throught the thread.. You quoted him on a post he called a group of people bigots, and you said that anybody who calls someone a bigot is a bigot.

There is no need for personal attacks.

I just have and yes I did quote him but it was NOT directed at him. I was using his post to respond to a previous post without directly quoting it. Shoot me.

You did see what you wanted to see to try and get me banned. That maybe your style - it isn't mine.

Btw - you are personally attacking me with allegations you cannot prove as they are untrue. Usual nonsence from you.

Withano 21-01-2017 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9169541)
I just have and yes I did quote him but it was NOT directed at him. I was using his post to respond to a previous post without directly quoting it. Shoot me.

You did see what you wanted to see to try and get me banned. That maybe your style - it isn't mine.

Btw - you are personally attacking me with allegations you cannot prove as they are untrue. Usual nonsence from you.

Im not trying to get you banned, didnt even report the post.

But you have confused me. You wanted to call a left wing member a bigot because they called other people bigots and everybody who calls people bigots are bigots, but you did so by quoting a right wing member, who also called people bigots.. But this member isnt a bigot despite following your weird 'bigot criteria' of - everybody who calls people bigots are bigots - i think its your bed time.
Either be true to your beliefs, and treat right wing and left wing people the same, or stop attacking other members completely.

Niamh. 21-01-2017 08:39 PM

Can we stop getting personal please and stick to the topic

Brother Leon 21-01-2017 08:54 PM



What a stupid sign.

Withano 21-01-2017 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brother Leon (Post 9169650)


What a stupid sign.

I mean, historically, its entirely correct.

Tom4784 21-01-2017 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9168853)
People who accuse others of being bigots are bigots. Pot and kettle.

It's all a less intelligent way of shutting down opposing views/arguments.

That makes zero sense.

If someone calls you a bigot and you aren't then it's down to you to argue your corner, if anyone accused me of bigotry then I'd laugh them off the planet because it's a ridiculous suggestion. I assume the only people who feel that it 'shuts them down' are people who are actually bigoted and can't argue against it.

No matter how much you try, you aren't going to turn 'bigot' 'racist' or any words of it's ilk into dirty words.

Brillopad 21-01-2017 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 9169688)
That makes zero sense.

If someone calls you a bigot and you aren't then it's down to you to argue your corner, if anyone accused me of bigotry then I'd laugh them off the planet because it's a ridiculous suggestion. I assume the only people who feel that it 'shuts them down' are people who are actually bigoted and can't argue against it.

No matter how much you try, you aren't going to turn 'bigot' 'racist' or any words of it's ilk into dirty words.

It isn't down to anyone to argue their corner against those throwing around such allegations. Some choose to in response to the arrogance of those who think they have the right to make such judgements on people according to who they voted for in a public vote

To call people bigots based on that is bigoted. It is also easy for people who cannot justify their thinking with anything other than the use of a simple, insulting word.

Withano 21-01-2017 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9169729)
Some choose to in response to the arrogance of those who think they have the right to make such judgements on people according to who they voted for in a public vote
.

Apart from you said in this thread that this doesnt apply to the person that called those who voted "killary" bigots and feminazis.

So actually your hypocrisy on the thread has lost you another round of debates.

Brillopad 21-01-2017 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 9169753)
Apart from you said in this thread that this doesnt apply to the person that called those who voted "killary" bigots and feminazis.

So actually your hypocrisy on the thread has lost you another round of debates.

Stop putting words in my mouth. I am not interested in that post and have made no comment on it.

I am not interested in another pointless session with you. So toddle along and play your games with someone else.

Withano 21-01-2017 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9169760)
Stop putting words in my mouth. I am not interested in that post and have made no comment on it.

I am not interested in another pointless session with you. So toddle along and play your games with someone else.

I can comment on any post I like, this one for instance is childish.

Its up to each person to reply to, or ignore mine. Looks like you chose the former.

Tom4784 21-01-2017 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9169729)
It isn't down to anyone to argue their corner against those throwing around such allegations. Some choose to in response to the arrogance of those who think they have the right to make such judgements on people according to who they voted for in a public vote

To call people bigots based on that is bigoted. It is also easy for people who cannot justify their thinking with anything other than the use of a simple, insulting word.

Of course it is, if someone accused me of any of the 'isms' I'd argue the **** out of them. If you aren't willing to defend your point of view then that's your problem, SD isn't the best section to be posting in if that's the case.

Your second paragraph is basically a repeat of what you said before and it doesn't make that point any less ridiculous. It is basically the equivalent of saying 'I know you are but what am I?'

Calling someone a bigot isn't an act of bigotry in itself, it's just a very transparent attempt to demonise a word to protect people from dealing with the fact that all opinions come with consequences. It's basically what I've said before in other SD topics, that most people only want freedom of speech as long as it benefits THEM and not anyone else of a differing opinion.

If someone is displaying racist views or attitudes then it's well within another person's right to call them out on it because THEY have a right to their opinion too.

Freedom of Speech is not a one way street, Wombai.

Brillopad 21-01-2017 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 9169849)
Of course it is, if someone accused me of any of the 'isms' I'd argue the **** out of them. If you aren't willing to defend your point of view then that's your problem, SD isn't the best section to be posting in if that's the case.

Your second paragraph is basically a repeat of what you said before and it doesn't make that point any less ridiculous. It is basically the equivalent of saying 'I know you are but what am I?'

Calling someone a bigot isn't an act of bigotry in itself, it's just a very transparent attempt to demonise a word to protect people from dealing with the fact that all opinions come with consequences. It's basically what I've said before in other, that most people only want freedom of speech as long as it benefits THEM and not anyone else of a differing opinion.

If someone is displaying racist views or attitudes then it's well within another person's right to call them out on it because THEY have a right to their opinion too.

Freedom of Speech is not a one way street, Wombai.

More predictability. Not biting today. :nono:

Tom4784 21-01-2017 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9169897)
More predictability. Not biting today. :nono:

Ah, trying to make out that I'm baiting you because you don't have a counter argument to what I'm saying. It's a rather tired tactic.

Brillopad 21-01-2017 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 9169983)
Ah, trying to make out that I'm baiting you because you don't have a counter argument to what I'm saying. It's a rather tired tactic.

Don't bother then. I couldn't give a toss whether you think I have a counter argument or not. As far as I'm concerned there was little to have a counter argument to.

Tom4784 21-01-2017 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brillopad (Post 9170016)
Don't bother then. I couldn't give a toss whether you think I have a counter argument or not. As far as I'm concerned there was little to have a counter argument to.

Weren't you just complaining that people use the word 'bigot' to shut down arguments? You are literally trying to shut down this discussion by making out that I was baiting you....


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.