Boom !!:joker:

Here, here.

Politics is supposedly for adults, if people can't raise about that type of behaviour they have no right being there.

Even John McDonnell said it was gifts on the tree for everyone.

JC got more cheers, that the PM
at the starts

He and no one else has said there is absolute poverty.
However there is poverty, are you saying the 5th richest Nation should consider it acceptable to have any kind of poverty.
I certainly don't think that acceptable.

For the many not the few!

People assume that poverty means poverty.
It is based on different standards to real poverty.
Why don't they just call it what it is, say more people are on low incomes rather than in poverty.

Do you know how many didn't cheer? It may well be the majority didn't - loud does not represent truth - just an illusion of it.

True, the same as the aggressive way some questions are asked.

King of peace

look at him stumbling now,sorry he comes over as dodgy to me very insincere as fake as Katie prices tits

That doesn't make sense.
You listed absolute poverty in your post,I stated poverty.

For instance this govt considers people in energy poverty if a certain percentage of their disposable income goes on it.

Low incomes help create poverty actually.

Oh dear.
Not going down too well.

Can you imagine if TM had refused to answer that question,LOL she'de have been crucified,he just wouldn't answer,why not?

Tory grandpa needs to calm down

What a Nation of warmongers the UK is being taken on the road to being.
Nuclear weapons used will wipe all out.
As a song says,there'll be no one to save with the World in a grave.

Why ? did he ask a question that had Corbyn on the ropes?

This lot would be tearing her to shreds. But if it's Corbyn out come the defensive excuses.

This country will not be safe in his hands.

Well it makes sense to me.
I stated both absolute poverty and poverty.
One doesn't exist and the other is now a word that covers ' low income'.
The more wages go up, the more people will go into 'poverty'.
Not because they are any worse off, but because some people will be better off.
All to do with percentages and median wage.

He answered it before.
I think his hate for and position as to nuclear weapons has been known for decades.
He hasn't changed his position ever.

As a Corbyn supporter, I acknowledge that he handled that question terribly, however we're not electing him as a leader in a nuclear war, so it's not really an issue at the forefront.

DETERENT - do people Not understand what that means. Without it we are screwed.

He doesn't backtrack and change his mind every few months

It's staying :conf::conf::conf:

No.
I say again,low incomes can lead to poverty.
Address low incomes then poverty will decrease.
Two different things.