| Tom4784 |
10-09-2017 12:57 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brillopad
(Post 9614595)
The thing is there is a thin line between outcome and perceived outcome in my opinion, as we see on here too often, when some use the word 'racism' as a tool to exert control over the thinking/behaviour of others. The word is regularly abused due to agendas.
I believe many are blurring the lines between race and religion, either consciously or sub-consciously. They are not the sane thing. Religion is, or should be, a lifestyle choice. It isn't a physical or mental entity over which we have no control. It is a choice and choice comes with responsibility. Personal choice can and should be challenged when imposed on others.
Almost every country/culture in the world wants to preserve its heritage and way of life. Britain is no exception. You can call that 'fear' if you want to, but i feel it shows a healthy respect for what one has and their value of it. Don't we all aspire to that - to value what we have and passing that to future generations.
I am not opposed to different cultures or way of lives, just that incoming religions to a country should assimilate not dominate.
|
How weak willed must someone be that one word can destroy anything they say? If you believe your argument can be shut down by an accusation of racism then your argument was weak to begin with. You've accused me of plenty in the past but I've not broken down and tried to make out that you shouldn't be allowed to make those accusations, instead I've curbstomped those accusations.
You have been determined to make out that 'racism' and 'bigotry' are dirty words that are more grave than the injustices they represent because you are guilty of both. If you weren't then you wouldn't try to restrict people calling others out on it. Accusations can't shut down arguments if they are false.
As for blurring the lines between race and religion....
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...ghlight=chores
In this thread you saw a child with brown skin and two arabic sounding names and made conclusions based on that alone, you didn't know they were muslim, you just made assumptions based purely on their race.
The whole 'preserving culture' bull**** is just another attempt at vindicating your hate. You only pretend to be a feminist when you think it gives you the right to bash muslims otherwise you'll support things like the DUP deal and the 'Moggmentum' movement despite that both the party and Rees-Mogg have displayed extreme anti-women's rights views. You'll claim to hate Political Correctness yet you embrace it as long as it protects your views yet you'll go back to hating it as soon as it isn't beneficial to you. Same with Freedom of Speech, you love it when it enables you to be as racist as you like but you'll try to encroach on the rights of others who have differing opinions to you. The only thing you truly stand for is hating muslims, all these other stances you take are just (in your own mind) justifications for your bigotry.
Your last sentence continues to reveal your ignorance about muslims in general. You think they are some kind of Cybermen that will convert all in their path to their religion which just isn't indicative to the average muslim. You are a slave to your own bigotry and anything that adheres to your confirmation bias. |
