You make it sound like that's a crazy idea, but it depends on the situation. Statistically people being harmed (whatever form of violence) are harmed by people they know or are related to. It would be negligent for anyone investigating a crime to not start at the beginning and work with the information they've got.

If I reported my gf missing, I would fully expect to be their initial suspect. Investigations have to start somewhere, and starting with the last person to see or speak to the missing person is exactly where I'd want the police to start looking.

No it's the right idea to look at those reporting the crime, why has the uk police not looked st the parents as suspects.

Ahh sorry my mistake. I misunderstood what you meant.

What a facetious comment.

They didn't report a crime, a tragedy occurred because of their own criminal neglectful actions.

All we know with certainty is that it is a case of a missing child. There is no evidence of abduction, so why are the parents always excluded as being potential killers or at a minimum complicit in obstruction of justice. If a case is being reviewed, all aspects should be included in the review. Starting the review with .... the parents didn't do it, is not respecting the missing child.

Go troll lt, stop trying to knock me as a person.

Are you Gerry McCann?

If not, what the hell are you on about?

If you only want people agreeing with you you're in the wrong place.

Exactly

true, we can all have our own opinion :hee:

You can do one as well. You flip flop.

Why not Kate? Hhhmmm