ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 4 of 14 « First 23 4 56 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Do you think Pansexuality is a thing? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=341231)

Withano 20-05-2018 09:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redway (Post 10001512)
You would say that though wouldn't you. You're not even trying to understand or accept different opinions.
You gave me this to work with. Theres opinions which Ive enjoyed discussing on this thread, and then theres just nonsensical messes. I’ll leave it as this, you’re probably inadvertedly doing a better job at convincing the forum that pan could be a thing than I am.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redway (Post 10001508)
Because transexualism isn't a discrete sexual orientation but gender orientation. Call me old-skool but I do think sexuality tends to one of two directions (hetero or homo-sexual). Everything else either in my eyes has nothing to do with actual sexual orientation (demisexuality) or else just doesn't count as a bona-fide label. As PC and accepting as we get over the decades there's fundamentals of sexuality. Reproduction's one of them.

Redway 20-05-2018 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10001515)
Plenty of people are "aroused" by a personality. Ever heard the phrase "laughing her into bed" ?

The differences are too insignificant to count toward anything, someone of any sexuality can only feel attraction towards certain personalities.

Shall we invent a new sexuality label for straight people who are only attracted to people whose personality they gel with? Or a new sexuality label for women who only date funny guys? No, because there's no need. Just like there's no need for the label "Pansexual" !
Oh I know. Personsexual. And anyone who who doesn't agree with that stupid label can have a personaphobia label thrown at them. That's how it is in this day and age. Talk about gone too flaming far.

Redway 20-05-2018 09:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano (Post 10001517)
You gave me this to work with. Theres opinions which Ive enjoyed discussing on this thread, and then theres just nonsensical messes. I’ll leave it as this, you’re probably inadvertedly doing a better job at convincing the forum that pan could be a thing than I am.
Show me who here's convinced pansexuality's a discrete orientation. Is it the people you've been arguing with on this thread since?

Denver 20-05-2018 09:45 PM
Also with pansexuality you never find yourself attracted to the same thing

I could be attract to ones personality but hate the next person who is the exact same.

It is always about the individual and not the group

Withano 20-05-2018 09:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10001515)
Plenty of people are "aroused" by a personality. Ever heard the phrase "laughing her into bed" ?

The differences are too insignificant to count toward anything, someone of any sexuality can only feel attraction towards certain personalities.

Shall we invent a new sexuality label for straight people who are only attracted to people whose personality they gel with? Or a new sexuality label for women who only date funny guys? No, because there's no need. Just like there's no need for the label "Pansexual" !
Does this not seem like roundabouts. Youre missing the part where pansexuals do not care for gender. it isnt the same no matter how much you want it to be.

Unless youre claiming anybody who ever would sleep with both sexes is bi, I don’t see your point.

Withano 20-05-2018 09:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redway (Post 10001519)
Show me who here's convinced pansexuality's a discrete orientation. Is it the people you've been arguing with on this thread since?
Give it a chance, your incoherent thought process has only been up a few seconds.

Redway 20-05-2018 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano (Post 10001521)
Does this not seem like roundabouts. Youre missing the part where pansexuals do not care for gender. it isnt the same no matter how much you want it to be.

Unless youre claiming anybody who ever would sleep with both sexes is bi, I don’t see your point.
Ain't that the definition of bisexuality right down to the T?

Christ on a flipping bike.

Oliver_W 20-05-2018 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano (Post 10001521)
Does this not seem like roundabouts. Youre missing the part where pansexuals do not care for gender. it isnt the same no matter how much you want it to be.
Nor do bisexuals, as they like both.

Denver 20-05-2018 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10001525)
Nor do bisexuals, as they like both.
Bisexuals choose which gender to look for pansexuality you allow the gender to find you

Redway 20-05-2018 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano (Post 10001522)
Give it a chance, your incoherent thought process has only been up a few seconds.
And everyone else on this thread who isn't flogging this pan-sexuality label is raving too according to that. I see.

It's all about you innit. Everyone has to be 100% behind the label and if they're not all on board they need to run it by you in no fewer than a whole essay about why they doubt the validity of a million and two alternative sexual labels that have all popped up in this century.

Withano 20-05-2018 09:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10001525)
Nor do bisexuals, as they like both.
They are sexually attracted to both genders.

Pan people do not care for your gender.

TomC 20-05-2018 09:51 PM
Why are some backward people so annoyed by minorities defending themselves, and trying to gain acceptance lmao

TomC 20-05-2018 09:51 PM
@Redway

Withano 20-05-2018 09:52 PM
A thread about if it exists is a bit pointless when the people in it are kind of refusing to acknowledge what it is supposed to be.

Redway 20-05-2018 09:52 PM
People are backward for not agreeing with all these 21st-century labels. I see.

Withano 20-05-2018 09:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redway (Post 10001535)
People are backward for not agreeing with all these 21st-century labels. I see.
Its been about since the early 1900s, dude.

Denver 20-05-2018 09:53 PM
I am surprised nobody has made a joke about shagging a frying pan :idc:

TomC 20-05-2018 09:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redway (Post 10001535)
People are backward for not agreeing with all these 21st-century labels. I see.
Which labels are you referring to? Discounting 'pansexual', which is pretty widely accepted.

Redway 20-05-2018 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TomC (Post 10001538)
Which labels are you referring to? Discounting 'pansexual', which is pretty widely accepted.
Demisexual for one.

Oliver_W 20-05-2018 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 10001527)
Bisexuals choose which gender to look for pansexuality you allow the gender to find you
So sexuality is a choice, is it? Bisexuals get to "choose" who they're attracted to? Gotcha.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano (Post 10001531)
Pan people do not care for your gender.
So how is that different to being attracted to both genders? Someone who's bi wouldn't care which gender they date.

Denver 20-05-2018 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10001542)
So sexuality is a choice, is it? Bisexuals get to "choose" who they're attracted to? Gotcha
Bisexuals decide whether to look for a man or a woman

Withano 20-05-2018 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10001542)
So sexuality is a choice, is it? Bisexuals get to "choose" who they're attracted to? Gotcha.

So how is that different to being attracted to both genders? Someone who's bi wouldn't care which gender they date.
A bi person would consider dating a man because they are sexually attracted to men and a bi person would consider dating a woman because they are sexually attracted to women. A pan person would consider dating both, but not because of sexual attraction to gender.

Oliver_W 20-05-2018 09:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adam. (Post 10001545)
Bisexuals decide whether to look for a man or a woman
Nice of you to speak for bisexuals. I can say that bi people may intend to look for a man or woman, but can easily fall for the other. Especially if they have a good personality!

Oliver_W 20-05-2018 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Withano (Post 10001548)
A bi person would consider dating a man because they are sexually attracted to men and a bi person would consider dating a woman because they are sexually attracted to women. A pan person would consider dating both, but not because of sexual attraction to gender.
Again, I don't see why that needs a different label. Bi people can like both genders and prioritize personality instead of looks, and that doesn't make them "pan".

Do you draw a line between a bisexual who puts personality before sexual attraction, and someone who is "pansexual" ?

Withano 20-05-2018 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver_W (Post 10001551)
Again, I don't see why that needs a different label. Bi people can like both genders and prioritize personality instead of looks, and that doesn't make them "pan".

Do you draw a line between a bisexual who puts personality before sexual attraction, and someone who is "pansexual" ?
You dont see the difference between somebody who is sexually attracted to both genders and somebody who does not care for gender?

Really? Sleep on it. Theres a pretty obvious difference lol.

That’s not really what this thread was about.


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:27 PM.
Page 4 of 14 « First 23 4 56 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.