ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Prince Harry and Meghan have stepped back as Senior Members of the royal family (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=364209)

Marsh. 09-01-2020 08:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by armand.kay (Post 10750886)
a gorgeous netflix series would not be slumming it luv.

Does she get a chauffeur?

armand.kay 09-01-2020 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10750889)
Does she get a chauffeur?

a personal caterer too I imagine.

armand.kay 09-01-2020 08:55 AM

clip of Meghan and our Fergie bumping into each other on their new reality show

Crimson Dynamo 09-01-2020 09:12 AM

Piers has said: FIRE THEM NOW

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01...8563486653.jpg

" Who the ****** do they think are? Seriously? I've seen some disgraceful royal
antics in my time, but for pure arrogance, entitlement, greed, and wilful
disrespect, nothing has ever quite matched the behaviour of the 'Duke and
Duchess of Sussex', writes PIERS MORGAN. I put inverted commas around
those titles because I sincerely hope they won't exist much longer. Indeed, if I
were Her Majesty the Queen, I would unceremoniously strip Harry and
Meghan of all their titles with immediate effect and despatch them back into
civilian life. These two deluded clowns announced yesterday they were
quitting life as senior royals. In a series of staggeringly pompous statements
on their gleaming new Hollywood-style website, they laid down the law to the
Queen and to the rest of us about exactly how things are supposedly going to
work from this moment on. "


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...-Hustlers.html

Kazanne 09-01-2020 09:22 AM

This is being debated almost everywhere , exactly the sort of thing they are moving away from, some people seem to think they will make matters worse and the US media can also be cruel and fake ie The National Enquirer, people etc, So if they want a private life they need to stop putting themselves forwards I think,I hope they find an idyllic spot and live in peace,but we all know how relentless the press are,they have destroyed many lives.

Mystic Mock 09-01-2020 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 10750707)
They are dead to me.

Seriously?:laugh:

Cherie 09-01-2020 09:24 AM

If they really want to step away give up the titles, that's not likely to happen given they have used it as their new company name :laugh:

MTVN 09-01-2020 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10750905)
Piers has said: FIRE THEM NOW

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2020/01...8563486653.jpg

" Who the ****** do they think are? Seriously? I've seen some disgraceful royal
antics in my time, but for pure arrogance, entitlement, greed, and wilful
disrespect, nothing has ever quite matched the behaviour of the 'Duke and
Duchess of Sussex', writes PIERS MORGAN. I put inverted commas around
those titles because I sincerely hope they won't exist much longer. Indeed, if I
were Her Majesty the Queen, I would unceremoniously strip Harry and
Meghan of all their titles with immediate effect and despatch them back into
civilian life. These two deluded clowns announced yesterday they were
quitting life as senior royals. In a series of staggeringly pompous statements
on their gleaming new Hollywood-style website, they laid down the law to the
Queen and to the rest of us about exactly how things are supposedly going to
work from this moment on. "


https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...-Hustlers.html

Quote:

In their lengthy list of pronouncements, Harry and Meghan say they will now be spending much of their time in North America, where they've just be lounging on their lazy backsides for six weeks 'much-needed holiday' – a holiday from what, exactly? - at a multi-millionaire's waterside mansion in Canada.

Oh, and they're going to seek to be 'financially independent'.

It's only when you read the details of this 'independence' that you realise what it actually means is they want to live off Harry's dad's money, from Prince Charles and his Duchy of Cornwall – which he only possesses by right of being the Queen's heir.

They have also informed us they intend to continue living for free, when they grace the UK with their esteemed presence, at Frogmore Cottage, their palatial home in Windsor that was gifted to them by the Queen and which has been refurbished to their specifications at a cost to the taxpayer of millions of pounds.

Oh, and they expect to continue having royal protection too wherever they choose to live and travel – at further vast expense to the taxpayer.

And they'll want all the other stuff that goes with that like VIP royal travel.
Fair point

Livia 09-01-2020 09:32 AM

They should pay back the money taxpayers laid out for their wedding, and for the refurbishment of their lavish cottage. They should also ensure that Canada is paying at least half of the expenses for their security. But let's face it, another kid and five more years, and Harry will be back home on his own. See you all here in five years so you can say Livia, you were right.

Liam- 09-01-2020 09:51 AM

I wouldn’t be surprised to see them up and move to Africa, it’s where Diana’s legacy still lives to this day and everything he does speaks of him still wanting to feel close to her so it would be a good move for them I think, get involved with some wildlife conservation over there, wonderful new life for a lovely family

thesheriff443 09-01-2020 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10750916)
They should pay back the money taxpayers laid out for their wedding, and for the refurbishment of their lavish cottage. They should also ensure that Canada is paying at least half of the expenses for their security. But let's face it, another kid and five more years, and Harry will be back home on his own. See you all here in five years so you can say Livia, you were right.

I’m with you right now, he is love struck, a nodding dog.

user104658 09-01-2020 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10750873)
she has manipulated and controlled him like a puppet from day one, so sad to see

Nonsense, I find that people are totally rewriting history on this one. This has been on the cards for Harry since he was a teenager, LONG before Megan was on the scene... the idea that some evil cackling harpie has come in and corrupted sweet Prince Harry is just utter garbage. No, she didn't ever fit in with the Royals. No, she isn't Kate. No, it was never going to work. All of which are reasons that Harry was attracted to an American actress and not British Stepford Aristocracy. He was ALWAYS a square peg in a round hole and that's why his partner also doesn't fit. Also, everyone KNEW he wasn't like other Royals and talked about it all the time - even joking(?) that he ws of questionable lineage... and now that's being retconned into him being Perfect Prince Harry until a jezebel knocked him off the rails? :joker: come on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10750916)
They should pay back the money taxpayers laid out for their wedding, and for the refurbishment of their lavish cottage. They should also ensure that Canada is paying at least half of the expenses for their security.

The refurbishment I agree. Not the home itself - a gift is a gift, and shouldn't come with conditions.

The wedding, no, because the public got their funfair-ride spectacle (and the press made a fortune) out of that... I don't think there was any binding condition attached for what would happen afterwards.

Security yes I personally think if they want to be financially independent, that should probably include paying for their own private security.

Livia 09-01-2020 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10750935)

The refurbishment I agree. Not the home itself - a gift is a gift, and shouldn't come with conditions.

The wedding, no, because the public got their funfair-ride spectacle (and the press made a fortune) out of that... I don't think there was any binding condition attached for what would happen afterwards.

Security yes I personally think if they want to be financially independent, that should probably include paying for their own private security.

Thank God you don't have the final say TS. I'd make sure that when they returned to their cottage it had been let out as a centre for the rehabilitation of offenders... or a refugee centre... or a hostel for the homeless...

arista 09-01-2020 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10750865)
we knew she would be trouble and we the GBP were right


Yes on AM Radio and TV Debates
it all the USA lady at fault
LT.

Crimson Dynamo 09-01-2020 10:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10750949)
Yes on AM Radio and TV Debates
it all the USA lady at fault
LT.

yep no love for this chancer from the GB public

Livia 09-01-2020 10:08 AM

They always blame the woman. Not the puppy-eyed, cock-led bloke.

thesheriff443 09-01-2020 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10750963)
They always blame the woman. Not the puppy-eyed, cock-led bloke.

I’m sure you could lead a few men astray livia’ lol

Livia 09-01-2020 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 10750965)
I’m sure you could lead a few men astray livia’ lol

Cheeky.

thesheriff443 09-01-2020 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10750967)
Cheeky.

Notice you didn’t deny it, lol

arista 09-01-2020 10:36 AM

https://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/...c3a5?width=650

Livia 09-01-2020 10:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 10750984)

LOL....

user104658 09-01-2020 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 10750963)
They always blame the woman. Not the puppy-eyed, cock-led bloke.

The flak she's getting just makes it clearer why they want no part of it IMO :shrug:. Like I said, Harry was on this trajectory LONG before he met Megan, it's probably why he was attracted to a partner who didn't "fit the royal mould" in the first place, but now it's all "Megan has led him astray"? It's just nonsense, he has been (for better or worse) Diana's son since the second he started hitting the headlines in his teens and although the public loved Diana, we all know how the Royals felt about her. Absolutely nothing to do with Megan, other than her maybe encouraging him to go with it when no one else in his life has/ever would.

Niamh. 09-01-2020 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10750997)
The flak she's getting just makes it clearer why they want no part of it IMO :shrug:. Like I said, Harry was on this trajectory LONG before he met Megan, it's probably why he was attracted to a partner who didn't "fit the royal mould" in the first place, but now it's all "Megan has led him astray"? It's just nonsense, he has been (for better or worse) Diana's son since the second he started hitting the headlines in his teens and although the public loved Diana, we all know how the Royals felt about her. Absolutely nothing to do with Megan, other than her maybe encouraging him to go with it when no one else in his life has/ever would.

Yeah i agree with that, he does seem to be very like Diana. Tbf it must be suffocating to be born into that life if you're a certain type of person. I know I would hate to have a spotlight on me everywhere I went with such little privacy and anonymity. Of course he has perks which I'm sure he enjoys but that life wasn't his choice

Cherie 09-01-2020 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10750935)
Nonsense, I find that people are totally rewriting history on this one. This has been on the cards for Harry since he was a teenager, LONG before Megan was on the scene... the idea that some evil cackling harpie has come in and corrupted sweet Prince Harry is just utter garbage. No, she didn't ever fit in with the Royals. No, she isn't Kate. No, it was never going to work. All of which are reasons that Harry was attracted to an American actress and not British Stepford Aristocracy. He was ALWAYS a square peg in a round hole and that's why his partner also doesn't fit. Also, everyone KNEW he wasn't like other Royals and talked about it all the time - even joking(?) that he ws of questionable lineage... and now that's being retconned into him being Perfect Prince Harry until a jezebel knocked him off the rails? :joker: come on.



The refurbishment I agree. Not the home itself - a gift is a gift, and shouldn't come with conditions.

The wedding, no, because the public got their funfair-ride spectacle (and the press made a fortune) out of that... I don't think there was any binding condition attached for what would happen afterwards.

Security yes I personally think if they want to be financially independent, that should probably include paying for their own private security.



What I can't get my head around is if he never wanted this life, why did he have the big public wedding, surely the two of them should have thought about what they wanted before the wedding, it's not even been two years, if its been on the cards since a teenager he had plenty time to plot his course in the world

user104658 09-01-2020 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cherie (Post 10751000)
What I can't get my head around is if he never wanted this life, why did he have the big public wedding, surely the two of them should have thought about what they wanted before the wedding, it's not even been two years, if its been on the cards since a teenager he had plenty time to plot his course in the world

He's 35, and as I said in the "when is a boy a man" thread - 30's sounds about right to me for people starting to figure their **** out. Also, the media turned absolutely toxic once they were done with the wedding. Probably lifted the curtain a bit.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.