ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   high court megan markle¬ (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=364368)

jet 15-01-2020 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10756038)
Posts like this make you sound jealous of her. Bless.

When you don't want to acknowledge something, play the 'jealous' card.
Old hat.

jet 15-01-2020 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10756082)
Well you've just answered your own question, Fergie is not a Royal... Harry and Meghan are.

The problem is you thinking you can read their minds.

What am I reading their minds about?

Marsh. 15-01-2020 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10756083)
When you don't want to acknowledge something, play the 'jealous' card.
Old hat.

When you don't want to see what's infront of your eyes, make stuff up and call it "research".
Old jet.

Zizu 15-01-2020 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10756041)
They have a private fortune of 34m, they won't be needing the States to fund them.



That’s also my stance .

I do love Harry though and MM is gorgeous so it’s all good


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

jet 15-01-2020 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10756089)
When you don't want to see what's infront of your eyes, make stuff up and call it "research".
Old jet.

When you don't want to be bothered to inform yourself, insult people who make the effort and base their opinions on that effort. You seldom post beyond a few baity sentences.
When have you even posted an article to back your opinions? When I do, its ignored and the sneering goes on.

Marsh. 15-01-2020 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10756098)
When you don't want to be bothered to inform yourself, insult people who make the effort and base their opinions on that effort. You seldom post beyond a few baity sentences.
When have you even posted an article to back your opinions? When I do, its ignored and the sneering goes on.

You seem to be under the illusion that you don't insult.
You're also deluded if you think any link you may have posted holds any facts pertaining to the guff you're posting in this thread.

You're wrong on both counts.

Marsh. 15-01-2020 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zizu (Post 10756096)
That’s also my stance .

I do love Harry though and MM is gorgeous so it’s all good


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Quite right, Zizu.

jet 15-01-2020 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10756103)
You seem to be under the illusion that you don't insult.
You're also deluded if you think any link you may have posted holds any facts pertaining to the guff you're posting in this thread.

You're wrong on both counts.

Bait, and you'll get it back. It's your speciality, certainly trying to inform yourself isn't.

Marsh. 15-01-2020 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10756118)
Bait, and you'll get it back. It's your speciality, certainly trying to inform yourself isn't.

All my posts have pertained to your comments in this thread about the thread topic.

Yours appear to be becoming more about me.

Speaks volumes about the weak foundations of your argument.

jet 15-01-2020 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10756120)
All my posts have pertained to your comments in this thread about the thread topic.

Yours appear to be becoming more about me.

Speaks volumes about the weak foundations of your argument.

Your posts consist of calling my opinions guff and made up, you ignored an article backing up my conclusions. I responded by saying your posts are baity and lacking in any substance.
At least I attempt a reasoned argument, when do you?

Beso 15-01-2020 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James (Post 10755983)
Posts deleted. No more insulting members.

Hi james....can you pm me the deleted posts please.

jet 15-01-2020 06:18 PM

Meghan didn't mind when her friends published cherry picked excerpts of the private letter that made her look good and her father bad. Did she take the magazine to court then - no.
When her father published the letter to put it straight he's vilified and the paper is getting sued. :rolleyes:

Marsh. 15-01-2020 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10756143)
Your posts consist of calling my opinions guff and made up, you ignored an article backing up my conclusions. I responded by saying your posts are baity and lacking in any substance.
At least I attempt a reasoned argument, when do you?

They are made up as the article was nothing more than the assumptions of a journalist.

You seem to mistake those for factual evidence.

Glenn. 15-01-2020 06:22 PM

Queen Meghan sure has made an impression

jet 15-01-2020 06:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10756175)
They are made up as the article was nothing more than the assumptions of a journalist.

You seem to mistake those for factual evidence.

Not evidence, but reasoned conclusions based on the long statement the Sussexes made about leaving and wanting financial independence. Have you read it yet?
At least the journalist, and others who drew the same conclusions, are in a position to make 'assumptions', having made the effort to do some groundwork.
If I post something you think is guff, look it up and provide a link to back up your disbelief, post a refuting article or at least state reasons why you think so, otherwise its just meaningless baiting.

Glenn. 15-01-2020 06:38 PM

An assumption isn’t fact though

Marsh. 15-01-2020 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10756188)
Not evidence, but reasoned conclusions based on the long statement the Sussexes made about leaving and wanting financial independence. Have you read it yet?
At least the journalist, and others who drew the same conclusions, are in a position to make 'assumptions', having made the effort to do some groundwork.
If I post something you think is guff, look it up and provide a link to back up your disbelief, post a refuting article or at least state reasons why you think so, otherwise its just meaningless baiting.

It's baiting to point out your use of the word "fact" is wildly incorrect? Ok jet.

Listening to biased journalism is not "groundwork" and does not elevate what amounts to nothing more than malicious gossip to anything more than what it is.

I don't really need to backup my post that the gossip you perpetuate is not factual and comes from no actual source. It's down to you to prove your assumptions, that's kind of how it works.

Marsh. 15-01-2020 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glenn. (Post 10756189)
An assumption isn’t fact though

Stop baiting by pointing out the obvious Glenn.

The Slim Reaper 15-01-2020 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10756190)
It's baiting to point out your use of the word "fact" is wildly incorrect? Ok jet.

Listening to biased journalism is not "groundwork" and does not elevate what amounts to nothing more than malicious gossip to anything more than what it is.

I don't really need to backup my post that the gossip you perpetuate is not factual and comes from no actual source. It's down to you to prove your assumptions, that's kind of how it works.

C'mon Marsh. Prove I don't have an invisible unicorn in my garage.

jet 15-01-2020 06:56 PM

Reasoned assumptions are all any journalist can make. But 'reasoned' is the key word here if they are coming to conclusions from what the source themselves have said, in this case, the Sussex'es themselves.

And do I have to repeat again that I only trust the opinions of the respected royal correspondents. They have proved to be right time and time again and 'in the know' over many years - many times when I didn't want them to be. I seek out what they are saying for that reason.

So sneer at me all you like for doing some reading because it isn't what you want to hear. Time will tell.

jet 15-01-2020 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10756190)
It's down to you to prove your assumptions, that's kind of how it works.

But you don't have to prove yours? :smug:

Marsh. 15-01-2020 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10756204)
But you don't have to prove yours? :smug:

Prove my what? My comment that your opinions are baseless gossip and not factual points?

It speaks for itself.

Marsh. 15-01-2020 07:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 10756203)
So sneer at me all you like for doing some reading because it isn't what you want to hear. Time will tell.

Oh yes I'll sneer at what you choose as reading material but that has nothing to do with you misunderstanding fact, opinion and fiction.

Read what you like Jet, but don't pretend your fiction is fact. :)

Black Dagger 15-01-2020 08:05 PM

This bloke is an absolute parasite. Desperate and tacky as always.

jet 15-01-2020 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Black Dagger (Post 10756255)
This bloke is an absolute parasite. Desperate and tacky as always.

Nice man. He was Meghans hero and worked hard to give her everything, she said so herself, until she met Harry and was too ashamed of where he lived and his appearance to let him meet her future posh husband.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.