You must hate when these people’s names are in the news

Trolls are the problem BUT the ‘victim’ of the trolls still have accountability of their actions because they are using their status to accommodate those very people. They have a responsibility to filter before putting their name to it.

Most of this thread hasn’t said they find it funny....

I mean how is anyone to know they are being trolled and set up?

That is the purpose of vetting names by a quick google search, it takes 10 seconds.

Maybe the lack of empathy for the sickening ‘prank’ makes it appear that way. It happens a lot apparently...but that doesn’t make it ok. To defend the ‘messenger’ speaks volumes imo. Poor Carole ‘the victim’....

:joker:

AHHHHHHHH I just watched the video :skull:

Pretty funny and a damn mess

You don’t...so don’t do it. If you were well known and someone offered you 170 bucks to record a message or tweet someone you don’t know would you do it?

The faux outrage over a random woman off the tv being pranked, I can’t

S - and I can’t stress this enough - ad

...and of course the context is irrelevant to you.

Is it like Voldemort, can their names no longer be spoken?

Yes. £170 for a 30 second video... yes

The context is that she was tricked into saying something about someone she didn’t know, she’s not spitting in the face of victims ffs.

And they say millennials take things too seriously?

Obviously

I think she’s a little embarrassed that she misunderstood the context herself earlier and she’s just ramping up the faux outrage to try and cover it.

Spot on.

Well if i signed up for cameo then yes... because that's the whole point of the website is sending messages to fans (who you don't know) otherwise that would be scamming them if you didn't.

Cameo you just get a message no pictures or anything..

if i knew the name or it rung a bell then obviously i would do research but if i had no clue then i don't need to do it because as far as i'm aware they are a 'fan'

I did misunderstand the context at first...but my points are valid and people should be held accountable for what they do if they use their position to make money. You are held accountable for sending a message oblivious of its content and it’s insinuations. End of..:nono:

Well, I hope you feel nice and righteous for getting into a tizzy over something on behalf of people you've never met who probably aren't even aware the video exists. Good for you.

You haven’t made any points, what you’re saying makes no sense, you’re outraged over nothing

Then more fool you imo.

Im expressing my opinion...I do make valid points and so do you. That’s fine. Move on... I’m not ‘outraged’ as you put it...just debating, which is something people struggle with on here when people see the other side of the coin.