True, if they actually wanted a quiet life they'd move to Bumblefuck, Ohio or something. But then Miss Thing wouldn't be able to also live the life of a celeb :idc:

But that doesn't excuse strangers taking pictures of her kid, especially in their own home.

edit: Not that there's anything wrong with her chasing the stars. The correct response to her (actress who married a prince) wanted to do celeb stuff is "well duh". It's fine. But pretending she wanted to get away from all that is silly.

No of course not, and I don't think anyone is condoning it, but we understand why it is happening

Im going to have to sue Google...my garden is all over the internet...

Yeah because that’s the same as taking a photo of a child...

Yes but were you in the pic Google have an obligation to blur your face and car reg numbers etc because of privacy laws.

I thought they were planning on moving to Canada? Literally my only news source for these people is this forum. Maybe i misread Canada for California, but didn't they say Toronto or something?

Anyway, no one is disputing that's it's messed up, and they're well within their rights to sue however, im giving it 6 months before their child is plastered all over OK or People or any number of rubishy magazines in an exclusive deal worth a hefty sum.

How disgusting of her to sue someone for invading her family's privacy with a drone and taking pictures of her child!

Sure
the best advice
I would give them
Hire a professional Sniper
get him to shoot down all the Drones.
Hide him away from the House.


Well worth Hiring/Paying the Fella.

I think she has every right to sue to be honest. It’s bad enough that there are paparazzi hanging around outside their home every minute of the day but for someone to fly a drone over their garden taking pictures of their child is just creepy.

If they win, which they should, i hope they donate the money to charity (i would say that about every celeb with their wealth fwiw).

But this is what they WANT! Little miss Hollywood wants the press to take photos of her because she’s so full of herself!

I thought they were taking pictures of their kid?

you need to lighten up...

No one is saying it is..:laugh:

They leave the UK(and then Toronto) to get away from ‘press intrusion’ and move to LA, which is known as the Paparazzi capital. A ridiculous excuse to get back to where she intended to get back to all along. Is it more important to have a Hollywood lifestyle or to make sure your child is protected?
No way would invasion like that happen in the UK, but its par for the course in LA celebrity land. When they come out of lockdown and are out and about they are going to be papped wherever they go. But Meghan will have known that….

It shouldn’t have happened there either as what happened is against the law, which Meghan knows because they’re now suing as a result

I doubt the aim was to specifically get a pic of Archie....any of them would have done. He happened to be there, so bingo....
They need to put Archie first and get out of rabid Paparazzi land, LA. Pronto.

The paps don't care in LA ...read what celebs who lives there have to say on the subject. Its the last place you want to live if you really want privacy...

What a ridiculous comparison

:joker:....it was a joke

Even if they did have professional pictures taken of their kids it is vastly different than a random bloke taking pictures of them using a drone.

Can you seriously not see the difference?

Where does it say this?

Spot on Jet

Oh i see the difference, i also see the hypocrisy too. It's the whole 'we don't want media attention, actually we do, but on our terms only'

That's not how it works when you're an A list celeb like they are.