ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums
Page 4 of 7 « First 23 4 56 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   PIERS MORGAN presents a hilarious sneak preview of Meghan and Harry's Netflix deal (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=369760)

jet 06-09-2020 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10908544)
Right, and Harry himself has made it very clear that he (as an individual) does not like and does not want that sort of family life, and so has taken steps to move away from the Royal Tribe. I think it's quite insulting to his intelligence to suggest that he didn't know he had chosen to marry a partner who didn't "fit the mould" and there's plenty of pre-Megan evidence that he's always been a square peg in a round hole in the Royal family.

So what you're describing isn't a "job environment" at all, because if you don't like your job and the corporate structure, you're free to leave that job and find another path without being vilified for it. Apparently, the Royal Family is a job that you have to accept, politely, and never dare try to quit?

And people are suggesting this is a good thing?
The Queen offered Meghan the chance not to do the job from the off, and she didn't take it.
Of course you can quit but you shouldn't expect to still be paid by Daddy, to have the same tax funded security, to have the perks without the graft....and that is what they demanded at the start of their departure in their 'leaving' announcement they posted on their Instagram page, without informing the Queen or palace first, there for all to see - to their astonishment.

Of course you can quit, but its not the quitting, its the WAY you go about it and how you conduct yourself afterwards....and its been one long litany of self - interest, selfishness, bad decisions, untruths, hypocrisy, tackiness, airing their dirty laundry, me me me whine whine whine ever since.

Marsh. 06-09-2020 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet (Post 10908561)
Yes, the Invictus games event was to be shown on Amazon - hence the conflict of interest. Harry created the Invictus games and always said it was his most important project. I guess making big money is more important now.
Did you actually read the article?

It hasn't gone ahead because of coronavirus and Harry is still attached to it.

The Slim Reaper 06-09-2020 03:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet (Post 10908561)
Yes, the Invictus games event was to be shown on Amazon - hence the conflict of interest. Harry created the Invictus games and always said it was his most important project. I guess making big money is more important now.
Supporting your family will and should always be the most important thing.

jet 06-09-2020 03:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10908554)
Probably because its the Daily Mail and their commenters have significantly impaired reading comprehension;

"According to an Invictus spokesperson, the event was 'shelved' due to the Covid-19 pandemic and was a decision independent of the Netflix deal being signed.

The event was shelved because the primary revenue generator was ticket sales from a live concert in Los Angeles in the spring of 2021.

'Given current circumstances with Covid, the event needed to be reconceptualised.

'This was an independent decision made prior to a partnership with Netflix. The duke remains committed as ever to the Invictus Games.'

The 2020 Invictus Games which was due to be held in April were called off because of the coronavirus pandemic."


Perhaps you also skipped half the article and went straight to the toxic chav comments, LT?
Very insulting TS, given the first half of the article is centred around -
Quote:
According to a report in the Sunday Times, the lawyer cited a 'conflict' of plans with another streaming service.
Which I read elsewhere as the reason, and the conflict was with Amazon.

The next half cites coronavirus, according to an Invictus spokesperson, as the reason.
So we don't know for sure which is correct.

How come you skipped the first half? Reading comprehension problem? :nono:

Crimson Dynamo 06-09-2020 03:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet (Post 10908597)
Very insulting TS, given the first half of the article is centred around -


Which I read elsewhere as the reason, and the conflict was with Amazon.

The next half cites coronavirus as the reason.
So we don't know for sure which is correct.

How come you skipped the first half? Reading comprehension problem? :nono:
The quote TS used is PR statement from INvictus (ie bollox)

the Sunday Times got to the actual story

Officials at the foundation were reportedly 'stunned' after a lawyer for the Sussexes informed them they would not be going ahead with the event last week, shortly before the Netflix deal was announced.

According to a report in the Sunday Times, the lawyer cited a 'conflict' of plans with another streaming service.

A source involved in the planning of the event told the publication: 'It's very bad form and everyone at Invictus is gutted.

-----------------


then we get the PR stuff trying to save face


--------------------------

Its ANOTHER PR DISasTER for this couple

:facepalm:

thesheriff443 06-09-2020 03:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 10908544)
Right, and Harry himself has made it very clear that he (as an individual) does not like and does not want that sort of family life, and so has taken steps to move away from the Royal Tribe. I think it's quite insulting to his intelligence to suggest that he didn't know he had chosen to marry a partner who didn't "fit the mould" and there's plenty of pre-Megan evidence that he's always been a square peg in a round hole in the Royal family.

So what you're describing isn't a "job environment" at all, because if you don't like your job and the corporate structure, you're free to leave that job and find another path without being vilified for it. Apparently, the Royal Family is a job that you have to accept, politely, and never dare try to quit?

And people are suggesting this is a good thing?
If he didn’t want that for himself and his wife he should of left before getting the tax payer to pay something like 6 million for his wedding and invite lots of a list celebrities to it.

Oh and look they went to those same celebrities to get help in the form of private jets and free accommodation in mansions.


They used the he tax payers money and his royal heritage to set themselves up in their new life you know the private life they said they wanted for them selves and son.

They then jumped on their he racial bandwagon because the queen saw right thru them wanting to us the royal branding to live on while condemning the royals

Marsh. 06-09-2020 03:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 10908602)
If he didn’t want that for himself and his wife he should of left before getting the tax payer to pay something like 6 million for his wedding and invite lots of a list celebrities to it.

Oh and look they went to those same celebrities to get help in the form of private jets and free accommodation in mansions.


They used the he tax payers money and his royal heritage to set themselves up in their new life you know the private life they said they wanted for them selves and son.

They then jumped on their he racial bandwagon because the queen saw right thru them wanting to us the royal branding to live on while condemning the royals
Lots of whining about people you don't know.

jet 06-09-2020 03:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet (Post 10908600)
The quote TS used is PR statement from INvictus (ie bollox)

the Sunday Times got to the actual story

Officials at the foundation were reportedly 'stunned' after a lawyer for the Sussexes informed them they would not be going ahead with the event last week, shortly before the Netflix deal was announced.

According to a report in the Sunday Times, the lawyer cited a 'conflict' of plans with another streaming service.

A source involved in the planning of the event told the publication: 'It's very bad form and everyone at Invictus is gutted.

-----------------


then we get the PR stuff trying to save face


--------------------------

Its ANOTHER PR DISasTER for this couple

:facepalm:
Given their track record, it fits.

Beso 06-09-2020 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10908605)
Lots of whining about people you don't know.
On tibb off all places :joker:

jet 06-09-2020 03:35 PM
And now he's apparently going to do a Netflix docu on Diana's life. Making money off his late mother again. Dear Lord, hope this isn't true.

Marsh. 06-09-2020 03:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet (Post 10908611)
And now he's apparently going to do a Netflix docu on Diana's life. Making money off his late mother again. Dear Lord, hope this isn't true.
A documentary about their mother? Well, the Royals have NEVER done that before. :shocked:

Crimson Dynamo 06-09-2020 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jet (Post 10908611)
And now he's apparently going to do a Netflix docu on Diana's life. Making money off his late mother again. Dear Lord, hope this isn't true.
No doubt dishing out blame right left and centre and then saying see the meedja killed me mam that is why we have to live in a big manshun in LA

wont someone think of the children???:bawling::bawling::bawling:

jet 06-09-2020 04:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thesheriff443 (Post 10908602)
If he didn’t want that for himself and his wife he should of left before getting the tax payer to pay something like 6 million for his wedding and invite lots of a list celebrities to it.

Oh and look they went to those same celebrities to get help in the form of private jets and free accommodation in mansions.


They used the he tax payers money and his royal heritage to set themselves up in their new life you know the private life they said they wanted for them selves and son.

They then jumped on their he racial bandwagon because the queen saw right thru them wanting to us the royal branding to live on while condemning the royals
Spot on!

thesheriff443 06-09-2020 07:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10908605)
Lots of whining about people you don't know.
You don’t know them and you don’t know me.

Try giving an opinion on the thread topic not the people in it.

rusticgal 06-09-2020 08:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10908605)
Lots of whining about people you don't know.

You dont have to know people personally to have an opinion ffs...

Swan 06-09-2020 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10908745)
You dont have to know people personally to have an opinion ffs...
I mean more than half this forum is about having opinions on people we don't know personally :joker:

When BB was in full swing - 'how dare you have an opinion on a hm you don't know personally'

In that case, what's the point of any forum, ever? lol

Marsh. 06-09-2020 08:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 10908745)
You dont have to know people personally to have an opinion ffs...
To... have an opinion on them as people... yes you kind of do.

Making assumptions about who strangers may be based on tabloids is foolish.



ffs

Marsh. 06-09-2020 08:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swan (Post 10908747)
I mean more than half this forum is about having opinions on people we don't know personally :joker:

When BB was in full swing - 'how dare you have an opinion on a hm you don't know personally'

In that case, what's the point of any forum, ever? lol
Having an opinion on a BB housemate.... doing something in BB is not the same.
But you know that.

Swan 06-09-2020 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10908754)
Having an opinion on a BB housemate.... doing something in BB is not the same.
But you know that.
So to be clear, no one should have an opinion on someone they don't know personally? Be that a politician, a royal, a celeb, a terrorist etc? Ok :)

rusticgal 06-09-2020 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10908753)
To... have an opinion on them as people... yes you kind of do.

So you never commented on the BB forum and posted comments about housemates....:joker:

rusticgal 06-09-2020 08:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10908754)
Having an opinion on a BB housemate.... doing something in BB is not the same.
But you know that.

But you dont know them :shrug:...you are judging them on what you see..you know the edited clips...no difference what so ever.

rusticgal 06-09-2020 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swan (Post 10908756)
So to be clear, no one should have an opinion on someone they don't know personally? Be that a politician, a royal, a celeb, a terrorist etc? Ok :)

:laugh:

LukeB 06-09-2020 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marsh. (Post 10908753)
To... have an opinion on them as people... yes you kind of do.

Making assumptions about who strangers may be based on tabloids is foolish.



ffs
Exactly but anything to keep up the obsession with Meghan and harry. You would think after the toxic hate people give they would be tired of it by now and move on but it lives on.

Swan 06-09-2020 08:59 PM
We form opinions based on people's actions in the public eye. This is nothing new, but Harry and Megan should be immune to this because?

Marsh. 06-09-2020 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swan (Post 10908756)
So to be clear, no one should have an opinion on someone they don't know personally? Be that a politician, a royal, a celeb, a terrorist etc? Ok :)
If you're not going to read a post, don't bother replying to it. x :)

If you have an opinion on a politician's politics, great. A Royal's royal duties, great.
A terrorists actions, great.

Commenting on a "celeb" or otherwise whose personal life you have no idea of? Foolish.

People commenting like they know Harry and Meghan personally is laughable. The comments about Harry not realising his own wife doesn't love him will be along in a minute.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:09 PM.
Page 4 of 7 « First 23 4 56 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.