Much better than you it seems.

You brought up a suspected peadophile as a reason for her not to do the interview, it's a comparison whether you acknowledge it or not. 'A suspected peadophile didn't benefit from doing this interview so Meghan shouldn't do it.'

Take a seat.

Still don't think it's a fair comparison, you're talking about on the one hand a guy who's accused of terrible crimes...actual crimes and the other a couple who have a bit of a family feud going on and are victims of a lot of tabloid gossip. And for what it's worth, I actually did like Michael Jackson when I was younger so I didn't just not believe him because I didn't like him, in fact by that logic I should have believed him. I didn't believe him because he surrounded himself with little boys and had them sleep over, encouraged their parents to leave them there alone with him etc. I don't give a **** what a court says, that's about as suspicious as it gets.

:joker:

It's honestly disgusting, Rustic. It truly is.

You are twisting and missing the whole point again....its quite apparent the point Kazanne is trying to make..

Nope, she brought up a suspected peadophile as an argument to why Meghan shouldn't do the interview, it's a comparison whether she intended it or not.

It was referring to one of her 'many' speeches and articles..the miscarriage article just happened to be one of them. See the bigger picture.

You're slating someone for announcing their miscarriage in a way you didn't like. It's their pain, their trauma, their loss. How they deal with it or choose to announce it as their own decision. It's disgusting that you'd bring it up, it's vile that you see it as something to attack her with.

You can downplay it, you can throw insults that I'm not seeing the bigger picture when what you're saying isn't that deep, but you said what you said.

i thought they wanted to get out of the publicity :unsure:

Its always the same rusti thats why I dont bother much anymore some people always like to find the negative in posts,i was indeed on about the interview and imo it would not do them any favours,but hey ho par for the course again,lol:wavey:

It's not that hard to understand they want privacy from all the media attacks they have who are continuing to bully a pregnant woman who just suffered a miscarriage but her haters have no issue with that.


They are not inviting us into their houses for a RTV show. A rare tv interview is no big deal

not haters, they are more Pro-Thomas Markle i think

Like they even care about Thomas, it's all fake. Just something to try and destroy a woman

No one is pro-Thomas Markle. He's a terrible father, and an obvious gaslighter that clearly sees his daughter as a paycheque. If he wasn't Meghan's dad, he'd be hated by people who make him out to be a victim.

Maybe the pregnant lady who recently suffered a miscarriage should stop putting herself through a load of unnecessary stress trying to convince everyone how hard done by she is....or whatever other message she wants to put across.
If I had suffered a miscarriage and then blessed with another pregnancy (which did happen in my life) I would not be putting myself through an interview process which could cause them more distress. I would be busying myself at home with my other child and put my feet up and look forward to the safe arrival of a much wanted second child.

It's almost like you are trying to blame her for a potential miscarriage and condoning media's bullying antics which is pretty gross. I know you don't like the girl but you are going way too far. She doesn't need to convince because everyone can see it.People should be able to whatever they want without the unnessary attacks. She would will still be attacked for not annoucing anything.

The attacks will continue regardless, let's not pretend that the stress is of her own doing when an entire country's media industry is attacking her relentlessly. If she can find a good platform and say her piece than that will do more good for her mental state than being told to stay quiet and suffer in silence by not doing anything about it.

:clap1: honestly people need to wake up and smell the coffee and stop being so naive :skull:

An example of a royal keeping their head down is Prince Andrew. He doesn't receive much press attention, purely because he hasn't invited it. When he previously did the interview, all hell was let loose. There is a very clear lesson there

Im not insulting anyone...Im giving an opinion and supporting my point of how dramatic and theatrical she is...It was THEIR pain and THEIR trauma but they chose to share it with everyone in an article that was like reading a novel.

Eamon SLAMS Markle for her antics
 

"It's not an interview really, is it?!': Eamonn Holmes SLAMS Meghan and Harry's tell-all TV
special with 'mate' Oprah which he brands an 'advert'

'Meghan's mum stayed with Oprah at her home as a house guest. So it's not an interview
as such.'

The Popular TV host also called Markle "Uppity"



https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...ate-Oprah.html

He has a massive reason to keep his head down though doesn't he? Him sticking his head out again might result in him being further implicated in crimes.

Harry and Meghan have nothing to hide from or be ashamed of

Don't rape kids?

the point is that it's easy to avoid press attention if that is your plan, royal or not.

Nice choice of words their by Eamonn........