As I said before, Morgan made in clear he was referring to her being refused help from the Royals, which is frankly not in the least believable, not that he disbelieved she suffered mental health problems....why is that overlooked?
It depends where you read whether people disagree with him or not.

This were I stand regardless of piers and anyone else.
Do I believe them,no
Do I trust them, no

From the interview alone it has been proven they have told their version of the truth from the actual one.

And the idea that Meghan was suicidal and her and Harry couldn’t get any help is the biggest and most disgusting lie in my eyes.

So whatever Morgan's motives, which has been done to death now, what about Markle's disgusting and unproven allegations and her outright lies? What have those who think he is vile (which is a valid opinion obviously if that is what some think, I must add) think about her (and Harry's) behaviour?

It’s unprofessional because of his previous friendship/personal relationship with her, not because he “gets het up”. It’s called conflict of interests, and it’s not a particularly difficult concept to understand, for anyone, let alone an experienced journalist, so again, he knows fine well his conduct was unprofessional.

I’ve temporarily opted in against my better judgement.

You’re going to have to be more specific because if you’re pretending these things haven’t been addressed multiple times on here, you are mistaken.

:joker:

So has Morgan's behaviour. Doesn't stop any of us. :shrug:

Take your pick on M&H's lies, or don't.
I'm opting out for a few hours. A good film awaits. :hee:

and did you say that when he had a go at Clarkson, Sugar, Cowell, Ant and Dec - he knows most celebs these days from his career and calls them all out if they lie or behave badly


His job was to report news and give opinion

its farcical to pretend he was the main news anchor on ITV

Nobody called him the “main news anchor”. That would massively overestimate his skill set. :joker:

its even more monstrous to then take on the "roles" Harry has

its downright evil in my opinion

Two strong willed driven people Harry serving in the army being in a combat zone and he couldn’t get his suicidal wife any help.

It’s an insult to people’s intelligence.

He wasn’t taking Ant and Dec out for cozy dinners and then going home to fap off over Saturday Night Take Away or whinging about being ghosted by Simon Cowell though was he :joker:.

The ratings didn't shoot up when he was about to give off about Ant and Dec or Simon Cowell though, did they? They sure did with hot topic H&M though and he did his job by giving the opinions he was paid to give. It's not as if ITV didn't expect a tirade from him beforehand given the very controversial interview, eh? :smug:

Are you suggesting that his unprofessional conduct doesn’t matter because he brought in good ratings?

.....along with Harry’s association with Mental Health groups and campaigns...but people still want to believe their bull****.

Why are you laughing between an accusation if racism and a positive call of support?

I find that strange

Because both could be the truth or both could be bulll****. Piers called for names from meghan than refused to give these so called royals who thanked him. Why??? I call bull****

One is a huge accusation in one one is being modest


Wtaf??

Are you saying piers said this and the royal family won't deny even though it's a lie??

The queen??

I'm laughing at the hypocrisy [emoji1787]

A TV programme wanting big ratings? Never! Morgan was doing what he has been doing for years, giving his unvarnished, honest reactions to the actions of anyone from government ministers to celebrities in his bullish style, which is why 360,000 people had signed a petition as of 20th March for him to be reinstated.
ITV knew what they were getting but got off scot free by asking him to apologize to Markle or leave. Kudo’s to him for saying he wasn’t going to apologize for what he believed, for that would make him a liar.

Do you think that Markle's lies and BS don't matter because the interview brought in big ratings, raised M&H's profile with Americans and lined Oprah's already stuffed pockets?

Because it doesn't really matter which royal/royals called him, does it?
But it does matter when an allegation of racism in the royal family leads to disgracefully unfair suspicion being cast on innocent members with the resulting speculation caused by not giving the name.

Never Explain Never Complain right? They won’t say either way :hee:

Harry and Meghan - Official Discussion Thread
 

No he wasn’t because - again - he doesn’t have a personal history with those people nor does he feel like he’s been personally wronged by them in the past, resulting in bitterness, bias and having an axe to grind.

We can carry on pretending that his previous - well documented, from his own mouth in his own words - friendship with Meghan didn’t happen or wasn’t a factor but it’s just getting silly at this point. There are videos of him - not hearsay, not rumours, not “reports” - freely talking about how he felt ghosted, wronged and hurt and you’d have to be extremely naive to believe that his dented ego isn’t a large part of this story, and didn’t massively play into the behaviour that got him dismissed.

It’s fantasy land stuff. The videos are right there, and there are countless more.

360,000 people signed to have him reinstated.
57, 000 complaints.
He is speaking for a majority.
UGov Polls also show that Meghan is disliked by a large majority, I've posted them as they appear.