Well obviously I know that.

However it is really not a fitting response.
I can say I've no recollection of an issue at an event, however that's not saying the issue didn't occur.

Of course lawyers would say things like no comment and/ or no recollection.
That's fine.

Really however, on this, IF it never took place, just say No it never happened like that.
Or is he concerned now in case any more will surface now too.

All I know is I'd be incensed to be accused of something I hadn't done like this, and at the very first and earliest opportunity would strongly and insistently make the firmest denial too.

That's my take on this.
I'm more with arista now.
I'd more now believe Caroline AND the second accuser too.

I still dont understand why Bojo is responsible for his Dads actions, are we responsible for our parents?

I agree Cherie ,it seems that narrative only fits when it suits, concentrate on the accused ,not their children . or is it just another chance to have a go at the PM ?

who was PM in 2003, maybe we can drag them into it

Hardly,since both instances are alleged to have occurred at CONSERVATIVE PARTY conferences.

Plus the second when Johnson was PM.

No he's not responsible for his Dad's actions.
However one would expect his Dad to act with at least some decency at his Son's first conference as PM.

Bit of a stretch to try to bring Labour or a Labour PM into this however..
Labour doesn't attend Conservative Party conferences.

Because Stanley goes to the Boris Johnson Political Conferences
and Stanley is Political speaker in Green Issues.



Kier Starmer wants the Police (what he stated yesterday)
if the Conservative Party do nothing - which is what they are

Did you think this way, when the press were getting at the deceased Father of the Miliband's to try to discredit Ed Miliband's 2015 election campaign.

Did you at that time say the Miliband's Father's actions were nothing to do with his sons?

I never saw anything from you to that effect on here.
Content possibly then to have Miliband slaughtered by the press re his Father.

However it mustn't be the case for this Leader Johnson.

I don't even know what you are referring to Joey, I did not know much about Miliband or his dad so wouldn't have commented, but then I wasn't following politics as such, so don't even know the story you are referring to.

Fair enough.

My point only was Kazanne, we who were behind Labour in that forthcoming election, when the press began trashing the memory of Ed Miliband's Father, in order to reflect on Ed himself.

I just didn't see anything on here (other than from we, who were Labour), as to that shouldn't reflect on Ed Miliband re anything about his deceased Father.

Cons were more revelling in it.

Thank you for your response Kazanne.
For the record from myself, I don't think this should reflect on B Johnson however.
I'd doubt he could control his Father's behaviour any more than Stanley Johnson can control his son's.

The thing is too however, what family does can bring issues for high ranking public figures.
For instance Jeremy Corbyn gets stick for the actions of his Brother Piers.

[Conservative MP Caroline Nokes is sent
'rape threat' and branded a 'Tory w***e' after
accusing Boris Johnson's father Stanley
of slapping her bottom at 2003 party conference]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ng-bottom.html