There's no way they'd put him in a general prison population... if he was to ever face a criminal trial and get a jail sentence they'd either have him comfortably in a little "suite" for his protection, or maybe in with a nice little group of fellow privately-schooled, University-educated white collar criminals who are in for fraud or tax dodging.

Prince Andrew has denied being a close friend of convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell, in a legal response to the woman who is suing him in the US for sexual assault.

----------------

thats a change of tune from his tv interview :laugh:

:bored: He really is pathetic at this point

10 of March he is going to give Evidence, under oath, from London.


https://news.sky.com/story/prince-an...-case-12533771

So how does that work…he answers questions on oath…who decides if he is lying or telling the truth?

Goes to the NYC Lawyers /Judge



He will have to pay Cash to halt all this.

He has reached an Agreement/Settlement in principle
for Virginia Giuffre


All Media

Thought she wanted her day in court :facepalm:

Big Money Shuts all Up

this was always going to be the outcome. The firm would never allow the laundry to be aired in court

A payoff was always the aim, I feel.

Yes her NYC Lawyers
are happy with the Millions
paid

Now all 3 News Channels are Stuck on non stop
Prince Andrew

SkyNewsHD
BBCnewsHD
GBnewsHD

Prince Andrew has settled a civil sexual assault case brought against him in the US by Virginia Giuffre, court documents show.

Ms Giuffre had been suing the Duke of York, claiming he sexually assaulted her on three occasions when she was 17, allegations he has repeatedly denied.

A document submitted to a US court on Tuesday said the duke and Ms Giuffre had reached an out-of-court settlement.

It said he would make a "substantial donation to Ms Giuffre's charity".

The document stated that Prince Andrew had "never intended to malign Ms Giuffre's character" and that he recognised she had "suffered both as an established victim of abuse and as a result of unfair public attacks".

It added that the duke pledged to "demonstrate his regret for his association" with the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by supporting the "fight against the evils of sex trafficking, and by supporting its victims".


https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60393843

-------------------------------

All his lawyers have done is malign her character:joker:

"substantial donation to Ms Giuffre's charity".



How Clever of those UK Lawyers

Time to clean up that street sign

Ch5HDnews
not stuck on non-stop Prince Andrew

Yes slow news day just one story to cover

Sign of the times

Ahhh. She got the pay off she wanted.
He doesn’t come out of it smelling of roses, however it’s probably the best outcome for the Queen.

Oh, he will be gutted hes not getting his day in court he was bragging about last week.

Fat pervy pig.

Oh wow she's getting a second payoff from someone she made an unsubstantiated claim about?

Maybe he's a skeeze, but maybe she is too.

it was a civil case so it was always about money. After Andrew failed to get the case thrown out pretrial, all the dirt was going to come out whether he was found libel or not, and thats not something the royal institution would allow to happen, so it was 100% predictable that he would settle

There was enough evidence to warrant it going to court Andrew had a lot of questions to answer under oath. People can make up their own minds, but i am 100% certain he was aware of what was going on. The thing is, his reputation is shot. When the queen dies he will then have zero protection, so i dont think we have heard the end of it yet

Apparently 97% of civil cases are settled out of court and Andrew was under intense pressure from the royal family to settle as the media circus lasting months on end from the deposition and civil trial would destroy the Queen’s jubilee year celebrations.

Note he has only expressed regret at his association with Epstein, he hasn’t admitted to the allegations from Virgina Giuffre. I’m very very surprised she didn’t insist that he had to do this before accepting the settlement when she previously said that was her aim and monetary compensation was very much of secondary importance.
Perhaps she didn’t relish being questioned on the stand either.