![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He doesn't look like a Doctor to me. He's far too young.
If he'd been 40 or 50, then okay. But why so young??? He looks more like the teenage assistant than the Doctor. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
He’s older than Smith when he started
|
Is Discord down for the day :fist:
Only joking guys how lovely to see you all |
Never watched Dr Who
|
Quote:
https://assets.popbuzz.com/2019/02/h...116-view-0.jpg |
Quote:
:joker: |
Quote:
Quote:
Anyway, waaaay back when the Second Doctor was being forced by the Time Lords to regenerate, they initially gave him an array of photos as to what he'd look like. One or two of them were obviously non-white. The Doctor's skin colour isn't important. |
Quote:
:joker: |
I can honestly see absolutely no justification for having a problem with the doctor being non-white other than ... well ... racism, sorry. I'd say it's FAIRLY obvious that, say Chris Eccleston and David Tennant have different genetic histories, they're not similar-looking men, so in terms of the core concepts of the show there's no reason he'd constantly be a white man.
I have more sympathy for the notion that The Doctor shouldn't have been made female, simply because it makes more sense (in terms of genetics) that Time Lords would have a biological sex and each regeneration sould still be the same sex. That said - it's high-concept sci fi so :shrug: if it's established lore, it's established lore. I also have to give Doctor Who in general props for always establishing precedent; we saw a time lord swap genders at regeneration with Missy. We've also seen time lords regenerate with a race change before. So long as they don't fundamentally change the character there's no issue. Or there shouldn't be. Which is why I'd find it hard to swallow if The Doctor suddenly became exclusively gay. The race "issue" should not be an issue. |
Quote:
|
iv just found out he is Scottish :amazed:
Im all for him tbh, a refreshing change and looks like the jaded series in on the up! |
Quote:
The writing however is 80% trash. A decision was made at some point to dumb-down the sci fi and make it all more kid-friendly when it had been becoming more and more clearly aimed at an older audience throughout the latter half of the Tennant era, the whole Smith era, and definitely the Capaldi era... it was a terrible move. Whittaker did her best with it. There are one or two great episodes where she shines, it's a pity the consistency is so low. I strongly suspect the latter half of the Smith seasons will always be the show's peak for me personally but still willing to give it a chance ... just go back to it being a little darker. |
people talking with nostalgia about the early series seem to have forgotten the dreadful acting and the cardboard sets :laugh:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The people on here who are actually attacking a man for for being black need to realise it is a hate crime to be racist, but I bet you a tenner they are all 2 faced when in public as they can only he their true selves when hidden behind a keyboard, thank god they will never be anyones role model
|
Quote:
What about these middle eastern Arabs who are notorious for treating black Africans like dogs, murder gay people, and don't allow women any basic human rights? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Capaldi Part 2 has some good standalone episodes but lacks direction and the whole Whittaker era didn't seem to know what it was doing. In hindsight, I think that's because a massive character arc spanning an entire decade had concluded... "where next" is a tough question. I saw what they were going for - that Capaldi doctor having resolved all of those issues would be reborn as someone more youthful, enthusiastic and gentle, but it's a tough sell after all that drama. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.