Well I've just read the whole thread again, and I can guarantee you have not condemned harry for hunting....

Hunters yes, but you have not once condemned harry by name. So dont lie by saying you have condemned harry when you havnt

Would Harry not be included in ‘hunters’ then?…….

You didnt condemn harry for hunting like you claim in this post...you condemned all types of hunting so you could include William's alleged boar hunting.

You skipped past the photo without condemning Harry's smug little face as he proudly mounts his kill, instead you used the photo to bring up something about his brother boar hunting in spain..


You have had an excellent opportunity to condemn the smug cruel sports hunter in the photo today...you just couldnt do it though..so I will add the word cowardly to the word liar...to make you a cowardly liar on this subject

In short you said I condemned harry..then you said I also condemned hunters.....you hadnt condemned harry so you cant use the word also..because you only done one of the 2 things you claim.

Honestly what is there to condemn in someone who has done something in the past that they now condemn themselves? Not much point in that really, is there. Not a fan of the modern world's tendency to offer no road to redemption - why bother working to better yourself if you're always going to be judged on your worst day, even if it was decades ago? And frankly... I'm very suspicious of ANYONE who says they would happily be judged on their worst day. If you took a snippet of anyone's life on that day and showed a video of it ... I reckon everyone looks like an absolute monster.

So yeah it doesn't matter that much if they've both engaged with hunting for sport in the past - if they regret it and don't take part now, that's all that matters. In fact, someone who used to do something turning round and condemning it actually means more than a layperson doing it, in my opinion.

People like to look at self-reflection and positive change and call it "hypocrisy", which is obviously nonsense. It's only hypocrisy to condemn something that you STILL engage with (or benefit from) or if you don't acknowledge your past deeds.

I condemned everyone that hunts because that’s how I operate. I don’t single anyone out just because I don’t like them like you do as I’m not as simple minded as you are. Any hunting is barbaric regardless of who they are. I think that was pretty apparent from my post but like I say you’re simple so have decided to go all around the houses.

Harry just dont use a gun anymore, he will still happily inflict pain and distress on 3 horses for one game of polo though.

:joker: :joker:

My god you’re ****ing sad

Calling people simple, because you cant bring yourself to condemn Harry's actions....

You said...I condemned harry and I also condemned hunters....you didnt condemn harry, you just condemned hunters...so you cant say "I also" when you only did one of the 2 things you claimed you did

If caring for animals well being makes me sad, then I'm glad I'm me, and not you, the one laughing at, and name calling someone concerned for animals wellbeing.

You are extremely simple mate.

I mean it’s pretty self explanatory. I condemned hunters. Harry hunted. William hunted. The royal family hunted. Every other person who has ever hunted = hunters.

I mean if that doesn’t explain in the most simplest ways for you I haven’t got all day to draw diagrams for you.

I hope the straws you’re clutching at are paper :joker:

9 years in the horse racing industry left me firmly believing that animals simply shouldn't be used in sport at all. Jockies are CONSTANTLY being fined for excessive use of the whip, they just accept it as part of the sport.

As you haven’t comprehended my posts properly, I’ll make it clearer for you.

You said William was boar hunting 10 days ago and I corrected you. He was not.
What’s the problem?
I’ve clearly said I think blood sports are despicable, which would obviously include condemning anyone’s participation in it, I don’t care if it’s Harry, William, Lord Muck or anybody else who kills animals as a 'sport'.

You also have the audacity to pull others up for not condemning william..when they have condemned hunting in their posts.

You clearly didn’t comprehend my post clearly enough. I copied and pasted a paragraph FROM THE ARTICLE.

Which I CLEARLY stated in the post you MISREAD

Oh so you’ve finally understood then

I condemned harry...I also condemned hunting..

To write that, you had to have first condemned harry..you hadnt...so you cant say I also...

Peabrain.

Jesus Christ I can’t deal with this level of intelligence; it’s through the ****ing floor :joker:

You do realise you are proudly displaying a photo in your avatar of someone who inflicts pain on animals for their own pleasure, whilst attempting to make us believe you condemned him.

All whilst having the audacity to insult other peoples intelligence

Could you direct me to the post number where you copied and pasted it? I can't find it.

Do you not do the same when you proudly swoon over William or other members of the royal family?

https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/for...2&postcount=49

There’s the link for you. If you click on that link that parm posted it will bring up an article about Harry. Have a read through that for me and see if you can spot where I copied the paragraph.

You have to click on visit

I think you have the wrong person, I referred to William's son looking like a stuffed pig on a banquet table just the other day.

So can we address why you would still proudly show harry in your avitar when you know what hes like with animals.? Or is it firmly brushed under the carpet for now?

It’s there because it triggers the haters… as per your post proves

You said: The article is clearly dated 2015. :hee: