You worship the ground she walks on….you don’t know her either. However we judge by what we see…you see a beautiful strong woman that lectures about love, respect and family values but fails to do the same for her own.

No he dont..

He just sees an argument on TIBB.

Does she preach about family values..omg..honestly? Does she.

Cause the first rule of family values is, dont wash your linen in public.


Wouldnt people agree with that?

I don’t worship the ground she walks on :joker: I just don’t think the level of hate she gets is deserved or rational. Especially when it comes from old men. It’s weird.

She had all the respect and love for her family before they sold her out. You keep forgetting that. Her family sold them out for some money.

You should here my auntie eleanor.. omg..the air is turned blue when she gets going.

<=====proud old man, still taking it on the chin for the ladies

And again..you are irrational..you have no interest, nor feeling towards meghan, but you are forever in threads about her telling old people off for their feelings, like some feelings Gestapo controller.

Start a thread about the irrational thoughts you feel about peoples irrational thoughts instead of derailing discussions with your thoughts on peoples thoughts.

Stay on topic glenn....

Seriously glenn, if you feel that strongly about your feelings towards old people, especially men that you would spend all your time on TIBB telling about 5 people (MAX) off for having opinions, then I'm sorry. But that is ****ing irrational behaviour.

That’s the weakest argument I’ve ever heard :joker:

Thanks to Jeremy Clarksons OTT bollocks even more people are starting to open their eyes to the irrational hatred.

You say you hate the woman but you don’t know her it’s ****ing hilarious. Literally the most stupid thing ever. You can’t hate someone because the papers tell you to :joker:

He mentioned Meghan and Sturgeon in the same breath as Rose West.

The fact that he did the comparison already shows me that he has crossed the line.

I didnt know Hitler!

Being a member of the Royal Family, a Family with a dubious history in imperialism, is controversial for people who are anti-monarchy so would you accept those comments about her from an Anti-Royalist who decided to target Kate as just the ramblings of one man or would you be, quite rightly, furious that someone would put that in print about another human being? THAT'S my point.


For the benefit of impartiality, I think Kate is fabulous - and in no way deserves any such comments - but I also don't think that level of vitriol should be leveled at anybody.

great post Nickster

Clarkson’s comments are a gift from the gods for Meghan because she and harry are drowning in their own pity

I think you have to look at who said it and why they said and what they have said in the past

Meghan and harry have made themselves a laughing stock around the world and are mocked by most now.

100% agree with everything you put in that post Annie. It's not even just about who the comments were directed at, it's the fact that they were directed at any woman (and yes LT I would have an issue with such comments directed at Katie Hopkins too as much as I dislike her) The whole thing is just so degrading and misogynistic and as you say the fact that the paper allowed these comments to be printed at all is revolting

Im not gonna argue what Clarkson said, im not a fan of his, i get what he said was supposed to be a "joke" but it was in very poor taste. Anyway, i will argue such comments directed at Katie Hopkins. What she's said in the past is vile, truly evil, about men, women and children. I would say she'd be fair game for vile comments thrown back at her. I don't think just because she's female she should get a pass. Obviously i don't wish harm or physical violence against her but people like her deserve as good as they get.

It isn't a case of "just because she's female she should get a pass" My point is misogynistic comments and that kind humiliation/degradation type of insult directed at any woman is insulting to all women in a similar way to you shouldn't use racist insults towards any black person (even if they're a horrible person) because it's insulting towards all black people if you see what I mean? It has wider implications.

I'm team Clarkson.

All the luvvie TV personalities came out in outrage against Clarkson so that they can keep their dated jobs on TV panal shows because they wouldn't be able to make it in the real World. None of those same people said anything when Jo Brand wanted to throw acid in Nigel Farage's face.

They're the real bad eggs, not Clarkson.

I mean Clarkson literally punched a Co worker in the face but yeah, great guy................

I thought you liked punching in the face. Arne't you into that cage fighting?

Yeah i understand what you're saying, again, his comments were really quite stupid. I guess there's a thin line between insulting someone for being scum, ie Hopkins, but not coming across misogynistic. It's kinda like, saying Hopkins is a nasty, horrible piece of sh!t is fair game and not misogynistic. But then saying you want her stripped naked and sh!t thrown at her in the street is misogynistic?

Nah i get it more now actually, the line isn't that thin tbh. Out of those two scenarios mentioned, one is a fair opinion based on her past viciousness. And the other is degrading towards women.

I like a sport with willing participants therefore I like people being assaulted..great logic Alf. No more food for you today now.

i massively doubt he is any worse than Matthijs van Nieuwkerk, over here in my nation, whom got recently cancelled due to being condescending to many of his crew from DWDD and also turning violent on some of them off camera (to the point of some requiring help by mental health experts)

thx to this NPO now have to search for a new Top 2000 a Gogo presenter for the end of year top 2000 countdown and music quiz, this show is a very popular traditional every christmas and the new years eve

Yeah exactly.

Thing is, that kind of comment isn't a surprise coming from Jeremy Clarkson, what's worse is that the article was approved by an editor/editors

most media outlets employ inexperienced kids these days, i doubt anyone read the article through, viewing it from an editorial perspective. That's just not done these days, it's too expensive