Parliament Live

Safety of Rwanda Bill Amendment 3G
The government has rejected the Lord's
Amendments


306 For the Right
229 For the Left

2nd Vote

305 For The Right
234 For the Left


Final vote

309 For the Right
37 For the Left

He'd have been wiser perhaps to hold off and shelve this policy until after an election.

It's a ridiculous one because of multi thousands crossing in the criminal sl gang boats
Only 250+ can go to Rwanda .

How is that a likely deterrent.

He's just going to be having himself left open to more criticism or ridicule on it
Such as has been begun today by Braverman.

Yet it's a policy where no doubt the Country support efforts to stop the crossings, however it appesrs most of the Country, neither understand why or agree with Rwanda as the designated Country.

"Only 250+ can go to Rwanda ."

Joey by July
many more will go.

the number that get shipped to Rwanda is only limited by the number of flights. Once they get it up and running, they could do 4 flights a day which would be around 1000 people, and that would quickly sort the problem out

https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2024/04...3827417674.jpg

The House of Lords
makes no more changes.

PM Sunak
has won his victory.

It now goes to the King
and The Rwanda Act becomes legal


[The government has committed to staging
a review of asylum decisions for Afghans
who helped British forces to ensure they are not deported
to Rwanda unfairly.
Labour's Des Browne did not push his
amendment as a result.

Meanwhile, in bizarre scenes the Lords was briefly
plunged into darkness thanks to a power cut.]

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-migrants.html



Sign Of The Times

Awful policy.
However let's see what happens from now.

Terrible.

Give it a chance to work.

…so the King approves something that he himself has openly stated as ‘appalling’…/ethically….and that’s the ‘positive role’ of the monarchy for his country…?…..shameful day…

This is a shameful day when he signs it and it's a shameful policy.

Hopefully it gets changed IF this heartless CON lot do get finally and conclusively booted out in anytime up to only 9 months time now.

This is a detestable policy.
I could never support it.

Apart from anything else the whole idea sounds completely bonkers !


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Of Course.

His Politics
does not run the UK.


Give it a chance,

This morning five deaths
in the French Waters


Ref:GMBHD itv Live

.... and way too costly too.

I know loads of people who do want the boat crossings eased and stopped
However I find very few indeed who think Rwanda is the right Country for this.

Which is my own position on it too.
I find it obscene.
I'd love to see where the evidence is that most of the Country support Rwanda as a safe Country to send ANYONE to who doesn't want to go.

Actually I'll leave it there and just applaud your own word for it Zizu.
Bonkers.
That's exactly what this costly and limited policy is, stark raving bonkers.

Ridiculous.

Find a way to actually stop the crossings, instead of trying to implement a "deterrent" which everyone knows won't affect most of the migrants.

When they come here, STOP giving them the very best.

STOP the best hotels, the best food, FREE clothes, mobile phones.

Just give them a tent and £25 per week for food. That's it.

TRUST ME, then they'll stop coming!

Lets see
Many Iranians in France paying Criminal Gangs
do not want Africa.

Yes Those Evil Gangsters
like it, they will have to pay them again.


5 Dead In French waters today